• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

夫妻的交互记忆系统量表:编制与验证

Transactive memory systems scale for couples: development and validation.

作者信息

Hewitt Lauren Y, Roberts Lynne D

机构信息

School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University , Perth, WA, Australia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2015 May 5;6:516. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00516. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00516
PMID:25999873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4419599/
Abstract

People in romantic relationships can develop shared memory systems by pooling their cognitive resources, allowing each person access to more information but with less cognitive effort. Research examining such memory systems in romantic couples largely focuses on remembering word lists or performing lab-based tasks, but these types of activities do not capture the processes underlying couples' transactive memory systems, and may not be representative of the ways in which romantic couples use their shared memory systems in everyday life. We adapted an existing measure of transactive memory systems for use with romantic couples (TMSS-C), and conducted an initial validation study. In total, 397 participants who each identified as being a member of a romantic relationship of at least 3 months duration completed the study. The data provided a good fit to the anticipated three-factor structure of the components of couples' transactive memory systems (specialization, credibility and coordination), and there was reasonable evidence of both convergent and divergent validity, as well as strong evidence of test-retest reliability across a 2-week period. The TMSS-C provides a valuable tool that can quickly and easily capture the underlying components of romantic couples' transactive memory systems. It has potential to help us better understand this intriguing feature of romantic relationships, and how shared memory systems might be associated with other important features of romantic relationships.

摘要

处于恋爱关系中的人可以通过集中认知资源来发展共享记忆系统,使每个人能够获取更多信息,同时减少认知努力。研究浪漫情侣中的此类记忆系统主要集中在记忆单词列表或执行基于实验室的任务上,但这些活动类型并未捕捉到情侣互动记忆系统背后的过程,可能也无法代表浪漫情侣在日常生活中使用共享记忆系统的方式。我们改编了一种现有的互动记忆系统测量方法,使其适用于浪漫情侣(TMSS-C),并进行了初步验证研究。共有397名参与者完成了这项研究,他们均表示自己处于一段持续至少3个月的恋爱关系中。数据与情侣互动记忆系统各组成部分预期的三因素结构(专业化、可信度和协调性)拟合良好,有合理证据证明其具有收敛效度和区分效度,还有强有力的证据表明在两周时间内具有重测信度。TMSS-C提供了一个有价值的工具,能够快速、轻松地捕捉浪漫情侣互动记忆系统的潜在组成部分。它有可能帮助我们更好地理解浪漫关系的这一有趣特征,以及共享记忆系统可能如何与浪漫关系的其他重要特征相关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fc/4419599/a56540ee037d/fpsyg-06-00516-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fc/4419599/a56540ee037d/fpsyg-06-00516-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fc/4419599/a56540ee037d/fpsyg-06-00516-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Transactive memory systems scale for couples: development and validation.夫妻的交互记忆系统量表:编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2015 May 5;6:516. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00516. eCollection 2015.
2
Cultural Diversity in Couples and Collective Performance: Using a Culture-Based Memory Game to Measure Transactive Memory.夫妻文化多样性与集体绩效:使用基于文化的记忆游戏来衡量互易记忆。
Psychol Rep. 2020 Aug;123(4):1176-1197. doi: 10.1177/0033294119835765. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
3
Association between romantic partners' rumination and couples' conflict is moderated by respiratory sinus arrhythmia.伴侣间的沉思与夫妻冲突的关系受呼吸窦性心律失常的调节。
J Fam Psychol. 2019 Sep;33(6):640-648. doi: 10.1037/fam0000544. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
4
Relationship Quality and Health Among Black Same-Sex Male Couples: Protocol for a Symbolic Netnography Study.黑人同性伴侣的关系质量与健康:一项符号化民族志研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jun 3;11(6):e29589. doi: 10.2196/29589.
5
Collaborative Facilitation in Older Couples: Successful Joint Remembering Across Memory Tasks.老年夫妇中的协作促进:跨记忆任务的成功共同回忆
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 4;9:2385. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02385. eCollection 2018.
6
Influence of transactive memory on perceived performance, job satisfaction and identification in anaesthesia teams.交互记忆对麻醉团队中感知绩效、工作满意度和认同感的影响。
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Mar;100(3):327-32. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem404. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
7
Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance.组织群体中的交互记忆:内容、共识、专业化和准确性对群体绩效的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):866-78. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.866.
8
Relationships Between Temporal Leadership, Transactive Memory Systems and Team Innovation Performance.时间领导力、交互记忆系统与团队创新绩效之间的关系
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Sep 13;15:2543-2559. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S380989. eCollection 2022.
9
Conceptualization and Assessment of Disengagement in Romantic Relationships.浪漫关系中情感抽离的概念化与评估
Pers Relatsh. 2008 Sep;15(3):297-315. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00200.x.
10
Mindfulness in the Context of Romantic Relationships: Initial Development and Validation of the Relationship Mindfulness Measure.浪漫关系中的正念:关系正念量表的初步开发与验证
J Marital Fam Ther. 2018 Oct;44(4):575-589. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12296. Epub 2017 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
It's not who you lose, it's who you are: Identity and symptom trajectory in prolonged grief.重要的不是你失去了谁,而是你变成了谁:持续性悲伤中的身份认同与症状轨迹。
Curr Psychol. 2023;42(13):11223-11233. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02343-w. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
2
Cognitive foundations of organizational learning: re-introducing the distinction between declarative and non-declarative knowledge.组织学习的认知基础:重新引入陈述性知识与非陈述性知识之间的区别
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 30;6:1489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01489. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical issues in research on sensitive topics: participants' experiences of distress and benefit.敏感话题研究中的伦理问题:参与者的痛苦与获益体验
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Sep;6(3):55-64. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.3.55.
2
You say tomato? Collaborative remembering leads to more false memories for intimate couples than for strangers.你说西红柿?与陌生人相比,亲密伴侣间的协作记忆会导致更多错误记忆。
Memory. 2008 Apr;16(3):262-73. doi: 10.1080/09658210701801491.
3
"With a little help from my friends...": the role of co-witness relationship in susceptibility to misinformation.
“在朋友们的些许帮助下……”:共同见证者关系在信息误判易感性中的作用
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Feb;127(2):476-84. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.010. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
4
Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation.测量实地中的交互记忆系统:量表的编制与验证
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Aug;88(4):587-604. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587.
5
Empirically supported ethical research practice: the costs and benefits of research from the participants' view.经验支持的伦理研究实践:从参与者视角看研究的成本与收益
Account Res. 2001;8(4):309-29. doi: 10.1080/08989620108573983.
6
The Memory Functioning Questionnaire for assessment of memory complaints in adulthood and old age.用于评估成年人和老年人记忆障碍的记忆功能问卷。
Psychol Aging. 1990 Dec;5(4):482-90. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.5.4.482.
7
Memory Functioning Questionnaire: concurrent validity with memory performance and self-reported memory failures.记忆功能问卷:与记忆表现及自我报告的记忆失误的同时效度。
Psychol Aging. 1990 Sep;5(3):388-399. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.5.3.388.
8
Transactive memory in close relationships.亲密关系中的交互记忆。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Dec;61(6):923-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.6.923.