• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"Everybody brush!": protocol for a parallel-group randomized controlled trial of a family-focused primary prevention program with distribution of oral hygiene products and education to increase frequency of toothbrushing.“大家都刷牙!”:一项平行组随机对照试验的方案,该试验是一个以家庭为重点的初级预防项目,包括分发口腔卫生用品和开展教育以提高刷牙频率。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 May 22;4(2):e58. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4485.
2
Consumer Satisfaction with a Tooth Decay Prevention Program.消费者对龋齿预防项目的满意度。
Front Public Health. 2017 Sep 27;5:264. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00264. eCollection 2017.
3
A 21-Day School-Based Toothbrushing Intervention in Children Aged 6 to 9 Years in Indonesia and Nigeria: Protocol for a Two-Arm Superiority Randomized Controlled Trial.印度尼西亚和尼日利亚6至9岁儿童为期21天的校内刷牙干预措施:双臂优势随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Feb 21;9(2):e14156. doi: 10.2196/14156.
4
Protocol for a family-centered behavioral intervention to reduce early childhood caries: the MySmileBuddy program efficacy trial.以家庭为中心的行为干预减少幼儿龋病的方案:MySmileBuddy 计划疗效试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 7;21(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01582-4.
5
Promoting parenting strategies to improve tooth brushing in children: design of a non-randomised cluster-controlled trial.促进育儿策略以改善儿童刷牙习惯:一项非随机群组对照试验的设计。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Sep 6;19(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0902-6.
6
Minimally Invasive Dentistry Based on Atraumatic Restorative Treatment to Manage Early Childhood Caries in Rural and Remote Aboriginal Communities: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.基于非创伤性修复治疗的微创牙科治疗农村和偏远原住民社区幼儿龋齿:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jul 25;7(7):e10322. doi: 10.2196/10322.
7
Prevention of early childhood caries (ECC) through parental toothbrushing training and fluoride varnish application: a 24-month randomized controlled trial.通过父母刷牙培训和应用氟化物 varnish 预防幼儿龋齿(ECC):一项为期 24 个月的随机对照试验。 注:原文中“fluoride varnish”常见释义为“氟化物 varnish” ,“varnish”有“清漆、亮光漆”等意思,在医学领域可能有特定指代,这里保留英文以便准确。
J Dent. 2014 Dec;42(12):1543-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
8
The effect of the SIMS Programme versus existing preschool oral healthcare programme on oral hygiene level of preschool children: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.模拟口腔卫生指导计划(SIMS Programme)与现有学前儿童口腔保健计划对学前儿童口腔卫生水平的影响:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2021 Feb 22;22(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05111-0.
9
Effectiveness of Family-Centered Oral Health Promotion on Toddler Oral Health in Hong Kong.家庭为中心的口腔健康促进对香港幼儿口腔健康的效果。
J Dent Res. 2022 Mar;101(3):286-294. doi: 10.1177/00220345211036663. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
10
Mobile Phone Support for Diabetes Self-Care Among Diverse Adults: Protocol for a Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.针对不同成年人糖尿病自我护理的手机支持:一项三臂随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Apr 10;7(4):e92. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9443.

引用本文的文献

1
Using RE-AIM to evaluate the implementation of a social marketing and free product distribution project for fentanyl and xylazine test strips in New York State.使用RE-AIM评估纽约州芬太尼和赛拉嗪检测试纸社会营销与免费产品分发项目的实施情况。
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Jun 12;22(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01259-z.
2
Adolescent Toothbrushing and Its Association with Sociodemographic Factors-Time Trends from 1994 to 2018 in Twenty Countries.青少年刷牙情况及其与社会人口学因素的关联——1994年至2018年20个国家的时间趋势
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 12;11(24):3148. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11243148.
3
Sociodemographic factors associated with oral health in 12-year-old adolescents: hygiene behaviours and health appointments. A cross-sectional national study in Portugal.与 12 岁青少年口腔健康相关的社会人口学因素:卫生行为和健康就诊。葡萄牙的一项全国性横断面研究。
Int Dent J. 2018 Oct;68(5):327-335. doi: 10.1111/idj.12390. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
4
Consumer Satisfaction with a Tooth Decay Prevention Program.消费者对龋齿预防项目的满意度。
Front Public Health. 2017 Sep 27;5:264. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00264. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a parent-designed programme to support tooth brushing of infants and young children.一项由家长设计的支持婴幼儿刷牙计划的评估。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2015 Feb;13(1):65-73. doi: 10.1111/idh.12100. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
2
Fluoride toothpaste use for young children.幼儿使用含氟牙膏。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Feb;145(2):190-1. doi: 10.14219/jada.2013.47.
3
Protocol for CONSORT-SPI: an extension for social and psychological interventions.CONSORT-SPI 方案:社会和心理干预的扩展。
Implement Sci. 2013 Sep 2;8:99. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-99.
4
The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions.行为改变技术分类(第 1 版):93 种分层聚类技术:为行为改变干预措施报告构建国际共识。
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6.
5
SPIRIT 2013: new guidance for content of clinical trial protocols.《2013年临床试验方案标准:临床试验方案内容的新指南》
Lancet. 2013 Jan 12;381(9861):91-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62160-6. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
6
Guideline on infant oral health care.婴幼儿口腔保健指南。
Pediatr Dent. 2012 Sep-Oct;34(5):e148-52.
7
Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research.理论领域框架在行为改变和实施研究中的验证。
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37.
8
'I can't relate it to teeth': a qualitative approach to evaluate oral health education materials for preschool children in New South Wales, Australia.“我无法将其与牙齿联系起来”:一种评估澳大利亚新南威尔士州学龄前儿童口腔健康教育材料的定性方法。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2012 Jul;22(4):302-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01195.x. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
9
Can we explain why some people do and some people do not act on their intentions?我们能否解释为什么有些人会按照自己的意愿行事,而有些人则不会?
Psychol Health Med. 2003 Feb 1;8(1):3-18. doi: 10.1080/1354850021000059223.
10
The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions.行为改变轮:一种描述和设计行为改变干预措施的新方法。
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.

“大家都刷牙!”:一项平行组随机对照试验的方案,该试验是一个以家庭为重点的初级预防项目,包括分发口腔卫生用品和开展教育以提高刷牙频率。

"Everybody brush!": protocol for a parallel-group randomized controlled trial of a family-focused primary prevention program with distribution of oral hygiene products and education to increase frequency of toothbrushing.

作者信息

Cunha-Cruz Joana, Milgrom Peter, Shirtcliff R Michael, Huebner Colleen E, Ludwig Sharity, Allen Gary, Scott JoAnna

机构信息

Northwest Center to Reduce Oral Health Disparities, Department of Oral Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 May 22;4(2):e58. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4485.

DOI:10.2196/resprot.4485
PMID:26002091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4457936/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Twice daily toothbrushing with fluoridated toothpaste is the most widely advocated preventive strategy for dental caries (tooth decay) and is recommended by professional dental associations. Not all parents, children, or adolescents follow this recommendation. This protocol describes the methods for the implementation and evaluation of a quality improvement health promotion program.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study is to show a theory-informed, evidence-based program to improve twice daily toothbrushing and oral health-related quality of life that may reduce dental caries, dental treatment need, and costs.

METHODS

The design is a parallel-group, pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Families of Medicaid-insured children and adolescents within a large dental care organization in central Oregon will participate in the trial (n=21,743). Families will be assigned to one of three groups: a test intervention, an active control, or a passive control condition. The intervention aims to address barriers and support for twice-daily toothbrushing. Families in the test condition will receive toothpaste and toothbrushes by mail for all family members every three months. In addition, they will receive education and social support to encourage toothbrushing via postcards, recorded telephone messages, and an optional participant-initiated telephone helpline. Families in the active control condition will receive the kit of supplies by mail, but no additional instructional information or telephone support. Families assigned to the passive control will be on a waiting list. The primary outcomes are restorative dental care received and, only for children younger than 36 months old at baseline, the frequency of twice-daily toothbrushing. Data will be collected through dental claims records and, for children younger than 36 months old at baseline, parent interviews and clinical exams.

RESULTS

Enrollment of participants and baseline interviews have been completed. Final results are expected in early summer, 2017.

CONCLUSIONS

If proven effective, this simple intervention can be sustained by the dental care organization and replicated by other organizations and government.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02327507; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02327507 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6YCIxJSor).

摘要

背景

每天使用含氟牙膏刷牙两次是预防龋齿(蛀牙)最广泛倡导的策略,也是专业牙科协会推荐的方法。并非所有家长、儿童或青少年都遵循这一建议。本方案描述了一项质量改进健康促进项目的实施和评估方法。

目的

本研究的目的是展示一个基于理论和证据的项目,以改善每天刷牙两次的情况以及与口腔健康相关的生活质量,从而可能减少龋齿、牙科治疗需求和成本。

方法

该设计为平行组实用随机对照试验。俄勒冈州中部一个大型牙科护理机构中参加医疗补助保险的儿童和青少年家庭将参与试验(n = 21,743)。家庭将被分配到三个组之一:试验干预组、积极对照组或消极对照组。干预旨在解决每天刷牙两次的障碍并提供支持。试验组的家庭每三个月会收到通过邮件寄给所有家庭成员的牙膏和牙刷。此外,他们还将通过明信片、录音电话留言以及一条由参与者自主拨打的可选热线电话获得鼓励刷牙的教育和社会支持。积极对照组的家庭会收到通过邮件寄来的用品套装,但不会收到额外的指导信息或电话支持。被分配到消极对照组的家庭将被列入等候名单。主要结果是接受的修复性牙科护理,对于基线时年龄小于36个月的儿童,还包括每天刷牙两次的频率。数据将通过牙科理赔记录收集,对于基线时年龄小于36个月的儿童,还将通过家长访谈和临床检查收集。

结果

参与者招募和基线访谈已完成。预计2017年夏初得出最终结果。

结论

如果证明有效,这种简单的干预措施可由牙科护理机构持续实施,并由其他机构和政府进行推广。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02327507;http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02327507(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6YCIxJSor)