Suppr超能文献

用于口服和呼吸道疾病的儿科药物装置:医疗保健专业人员有何看法?

Devices for oral and respiratory paediatric medicines: What do healthcare professionals think?

作者信息

Walsh Jennifer, Math Marie-Christine, Breitkreutz Jörg, Zerback Thomas, Wachtel Herbert

机构信息

Jenny Walsh Consulting Ltd., BioCity Nottingham, Pennyfoot Street, Nottingham NG1 1GF, UK.

Sanofi R&D, Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, 371 Rue du Professeur Blayac, 34184 Montpellier Cedex 04, France.

出版信息

Int J Pharm. 2015 Aug 15;492(1-2):304-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.05.041. Epub 2015 May 19.

Abstract

Medical devices are crucial for the proper administration of paediatric medicines to children, but handling and dosing errors commonly appear in daily practice. As both the understanding and the usage of medical devices for oral and respiratory drug administration are heterogeneous among patients and caregivers, the European Paediatric Formulation Initiative (EuPFI) consortium performed a European survey among healthcare professional stakeholders in France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Spain and UK. The results show country- and age-dependent usage of devices for oral administration of liquid formulations, with a clear preference for oral droppers and syringes in the neonatal phase and in early infancy. In older children, spoons and cups are more frequently used although it is recognized that they may fail in delivering correct doses. The percentage of medicinal products definitely requiring an oral administration device was estimated as 68.8% by the participants. The survey elaborated a similar usage pattern for medical devices for respiratory drug delivery: in young children drug solutions are nebulized, using face-masks and subsequently valved holding chambers or spacers, with increasing age metered-dose inhalers and later dry powder inhalers are preferably used. 56% of the responding healthcare professionals believed that providing an administration device helps to ensure that the patient receives the correct dose of medicine, and 41% agreed that patients must be given an administration device with each supply of medicine. Interestingly, 6.7% thought that patients tend not to use the device provided and remarkably 25.4% stated that patients already have a device. Although there is the highest count of treated children with device supply in Germany and Hungary, there are no observed significant differences in the six investigated European countries (p=0.057). Patient difficulties in correct oral and respiratory device use were identified by respondents and potential solutions discussed.

摘要

医疗设备对于给儿童正确服用儿科药物至关重要,但在日常实践中,操作和剂量错误却屡见不鲜。由于患者和护理人员在口服和呼吸道给药医疗设备的理解和使用上存在差异,欧洲儿科制剂倡议组织(EuPFI)联盟在法国、德国、匈牙利、意大利、西班牙和英国的医疗专业利益相关者中开展了一项欧洲范围内的调查。结果显示,液体剂型口服给药设备的使用存在国家和年龄差异,新生儿期和婴儿早期明显更倾向于使用口服滴管和注射器。在年龄稍大的儿童中,勺子和杯子的使用更为频繁,尽管人们认识到它们可能无法准确给药。参与者估计绝对需要口服给药设备的药品比例为68.8%。该调查还阐述了呼吸道给药医疗设备的类似使用模式:幼儿使用面罩雾化药物溶液,随后使用带阀门的储雾罐或储雾器,随着年龄增长,计量吸入器和后来的干粉吸入器成为首选。56%的受访医疗专业人员认为提供给药设备有助于确保患者获得正确剂量的药物,41%的人同意每次给药时都必须为患者提供给药设备。有趣的是,6.7%的人认为患者往往不会使用提供的设备,而且有25.4%的人表示患者已经有了设备。尽管德国和匈牙利接受设备供应治疗的儿童数量最多,但在六个被调查的欧洲国家中未观察到显著差异(p = 0.057)。受访者指出了患者在正确使用口服和呼吸道设备方面存在的困难,并讨论了潜在的解决方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验