Zhao Zi-Long, Zhao Hong-Ping, Ma Guo-Jun, Wu Cheng-Wei, Yang Kai, Feng Xi-Qiao
AML, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China Center for Nano and Micro Mechanics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
AML, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Biol Open. 2015 May 22;4(7):921-8. doi: 10.1242/bio.012195.
Through natural selection, many animal organs with similar functions have evolved different macroscopic morphologies and microscopic structures. Here, we comparatively investigate the structures, properties and functions of honey bee stings and paper wasp stings. Their elegant structures were systematically observed. To examine their behaviors of penetrating into different materials, we performed penetration-extraction tests and slow motion analyses of their insertion process. In comparison, the barbed stings of honey bees are relatively difficult to be withdrawn from fibrous tissues (e.g. skin), while the removal of paper wasp stings is easier due to their different structures and insertion skills. The similarities and differences of the two kinds of stings are summarized on the basis of the experiments and observations.
通过自然选择,许多具有相似功能的动物器官进化出了不同的宏观形态和微观结构。在此,我们比较研究了蜜蜂蜇针和胡蜂蜇针的结构、特性及功能。系统观察了它们精妙的结构。为研究它们刺入不同材料的行为,我们进行了穿刺-拔出测试,并对其插入过程进行了慢动作分析。相比之下,蜜蜂带倒刺的蜇针相对难以从纤维组织(如皮肤)中拔出,而胡蜂蜇针因其不同的结构和插入技巧则更容易拔出。基于实验和观察总结了两种蜇针的异同。