Gabayan Gelareh Z, Derose Stephen F, Chiu Vicki Y, Yiu Sau C, Sarkisian Catherine A, Jones Jason P, Sun Benjamin C
Department of Medicine, University of California, and the Department of Medicine, Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA.
Kasier Permanente Southern California, Department of Research and Evaluation, Pasadena, CA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;66(5):483-492.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.04.009. Epub 2015 May 21.
We assess whether a panel of emergency department (ED) crowding measures, including 2 reported by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), is associated with inpatient admission and death within 7 days of ED discharge.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ED discharges, using data from an integrated health system for 2008 to 2010. We assessed patient transit-level (n=3) and ED system-level (n=6) measures of crowding, using multivariable logistic regression models. The outcome measures were inpatient admission or death within 7 days of ED discharge. We defined a clinically important association by assessing the relative risk ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) difference and also compared risks at the 99th percentile and median value of each measure.
The study cohort contained a total of 625,096 visits to 12 EDs. There were 16,957 (2.7%) admissions and 328 (0.05%) deaths within 7 days. Only 2 measures, both of which were patient transit measures, were associated with the outcome. Compared with a median evaluation time of 2.2 hours, the evaluation time of 10.8 hours (99th percentile) was associated with a relative risk of 3.9 (95% CI 3.7 to 4.1) of an admission. Compared with a median ED length of stay (a CMS measure) of 2.8 hours, the 99th percentile ED length of stay of 11.6 hours was associated with a relative risk of 3.5 (95% CI 3.3 to 3.7) of admission. No system measure of ED crowding was associated with outcomes.
Our findings suggest that ED length of stay is a proxy for unmeasured differences in case mix and challenge the validity of the CMS metric as a safety measure for discharged patients.
我们评估一组急诊科拥挤程度指标,包括医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)报告的2项指标,是否与急诊科出院后7天内的住院治疗和死亡相关。
我们利用一个综合医疗系统2008年至2010年的数据,对急诊科出院患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估患者转运层面(n = 3)和急诊科系统层面(n = 6)的拥挤程度指标。结局指标为急诊科出院后7天内的住院治疗或死亡。我们通过评估相对风险比和95%置信区间(CI)差异来定义具有临床意义的关联,并比较了每项指标第99百分位数和中位数时的风险。
研究队列包括对12个急诊科的总共625,096次就诊。7天内有16,957例(2.7%)住院治疗和328例(0.05%)死亡。只有2项指标与结局相关,且这2项均为患者转运指标。与中位数评估时间2.2小时相比,评估时间为10.8小时(第99百分位数)时,住院治疗的相对风险为3.9(95%CI 3.7至4.1)。与急诊科住院时间中位数(CMS指标)2.8小时相比,第99百分位数的急诊科住院时间11.6小时时,住院治疗相对风险为3.5(95%CI 3.3至3.7)。没有急诊科拥挤程度的系统指标与结局相关。
我们的研究结果表明,急诊科住院时间可代表病例组合中未测量的差异,并对CMS指标作为出院患者安全指标的有效性提出了质疑。