Tenke Craig E, Kayser Jürgen
Division of Cognitive Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Division of Cognitive Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Sep;97(3):285-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 21.
Surface Laplacian (SL) methods offer advantages in spectral analysis owing to the well-known implications of volume conduction. Although recognition of the superiority of SL over reference-dependent measures is widespread, well-reasoned cautions have precluded their universal adoption. Notably, the expected selectivity of SL for superficial rather than deep generators has relegated SL to the role of an add-on to conventional analyses, rather than as an independent area of inquiry, despite empirical findings supporting the consistency and replicability of physiological effects of interest. It has also been reasoned that the contrast-enhancing effects of SL necessarily make it insensitive to broadly distributed generators, including those suspected for oscillatory rhythms such as EEG alpha. These concerns are further exacerbated for phase-sensitive measures (e.g., phase-locking, coherence), where key features of physiological generators have yet to be evaluated. While the neuronal generators of empirically-derived EEG measures cannot be precisely known due to the inverse problem, simple dipole generator configurations can be simulated using a 4-sphere head model and linearly combined. We simulated subdural and deep generators and distributed dipole layers using sine and cosine waveforms, quantified at 67-scalp sites corresponding to those used in previous research. Reference-dependent (nose, average, mastoids reference) EEG and corresponding SL topographies were used to probe signal fidelity in the topography of the measured amplitude spectra, phase and coherence of sinusoidal stimuli at and between "active" recording sites. SL consistently outperformed the conventional EEG measures, indicating that continued reluctance by the research community is unfounded.
由于体积传导的众所周知的影响,表面拉普拉斯(SL)方法在频谱分析中具有优势。尽管人们普遍认识到SL比基于参考的测量方法更具优越性,但经过充分论证的 caution 使得它们未能被普遍采用。值得注意的是,SL 对浅层而非深层发生器的预期选择性使其沦为传统分析的附加手段,而非一个独立的研究领域,尽管有实证研究结果支持感兴趣的生理效应的一致性和可重复性。也有人认为,SL 的对比度增强效应必然使其对广泛分布的发生器不敏感,包括那些疑似产生振荡节律(如脑电图阿尔法波)的发生器。对于相位敏感测量(如锁相、相干性),这些担忧进一步加剧,因为生理发生器的关键特征尚未得到评估。虽然由于逆问题,无法精确知道基于经验得出的脑电图测量的神经元发生器,但可以使用 4 球体头部模型模拟简单的偶极子发生器配置并进行线性组合。我们使用正弦和余弦波形模拟硬膜下和深部发生器以及分布式偶极子层,在与先前研究中使用的相对应的 67 个头皮部位进行量化。基于参考(鼻子、平均、乳突参考)的脑电图和相应的 SL 地形图被用于探测在“活跃”记录部位及其之间的正弦刺激的测量幅度谱、相位和相干性的地形图中的信号保真度。SL 始终优于传统的脑电图测量方法,这表明研究界持续的不情愿是没有根据的。