Kayser Jürgen, Tenke Craig E
Division of Cognitive Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Division of Cognitive Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Sep;97(3):258-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.12.011. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
Surface Laplacian methodology has been used to reduce the impact of volume conduction and arbitrary choice of EEG recording reference for the analysis of surface potentials. However, the empirical implications of employing these different transformations to the same EEG data remain obscure. This study directly compared the statistical effects of four commonly-used (nose, linked mastoids, average) or recommended (reference electrode standardization technique [REST]) references and their spherical spline current source density (CSD) transformation for a large data set stemming from a well-understood experimental manipulation. ERPs (72 sites) recorded from 130 individuals during a visual half-field paradigm with highly-controlled emotional stimuli were characterized by mid-parietooccipital N1 (125 ms peak latency) and event-related synchronization (ERS) of theta/delta (160 ms), which were most robust over the contralateral hemisphere. All five data transformations were rescaled to the same covariance and submitted to a single temporal or time-frequency PCA (Varimax) to yield simplified estimates of N1 or theta/delta ERS. Unbiased nonparametric permutation tests revealed that these hemifield-dependent asymmetries were by far most focal and prominent for CSD data, despite all transformations showing maximum effects at mid-parietooccipital sites. Employing smaller subsamples (signal-to-noise) or window-based ERP/ERS amplitudes did not affect these comparisons. Furthermore, correlations between N1 and theta/delta ERS at these sites were strongest for CSD and weakest for nose-referenced data. Contrary to the common notion that the spatial high pass filter properties of a surface Laplacian reduce important contributions of neuronal generators to the EEG signal, the present findings demonstrate that instead volume conduction inherent in surface potentials weakens the representation of neuronal activation patterns at scalp that directly reflect regional brain activity.
表面拉普拉斯方法已被用于减少容积传导的影响以及脑电图(EEG)记录参考的任意选择对表面电位分析的影响。然而,对同一EEG数据采用这些不同变换的实证意义仍不明确。本研究直接比较了四种常用(鼻尖、双侧乳突连接、平均)或推荐(参考电极标准化技术[REST])参考及其球面样条电流源密度(CSD)变换对来自一个充分理解的实验操作的大数据集的统计效果。在视觉半视野范式中,对130名个体在高度受控的情绪刺激下记录的ERP(72个位点)的特征是顶枕中部的N1(峰值潜伏期125毫秒)以及θ/δ频段的事件相关同步化(ERS,160毫秒),这些在对侧半球最为显著。所有五种数据变换都重新调整为相同的协方差,并提交给单一的时间或时频主成分分析(Varimax),以得出N1或θ/δ ERS的简化估计值。无偏非参数置换检验表明,尽管所有变换在顶枕中部位点都显示出最大效应,但这些半视野依赖性不对称在CSD数据中最为集中和显著。使用较小的子样本(信噪比)或基于窗口的ERP/ERS幅度并不影响这些比较。此外,这些位点处N1与θ/δ ERS之间的相关性在CSD数据中最强,而在鼻尖参考数据中最弱。与表面拉普拉斯的空间高通滤波器特性会减少神经元发生器对EEG信号的重要贡献这一普遍观点相反,目前的研究结果表明,表面电位中固有的容积传导反而会削弱头皮上直接反映区域脑活动的神经元激活模式的表征。