Georgievska Jadranka, Sapunov Slavejko, Cekovska Svetlana, Vasilevska Kristin
University Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty, Skopje, R. Macedonia.
Institute of Medical and Experimental Biochemistry, Medical Faculty, Skopje, R. Macedonia.
Med Arch. 2015 Apr;69(2):88-90. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2015.69.88-90. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
Operative laparoscopy is the most common used technique for treatment of patients with ovarian endometriomas, because of many positive effects in comparison with laparotomy. There are many laparoscopic techniques, but most used are cystectomy and puncture with endocoagulation (ablation) of the cyst's capsule. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two laparoscopic techniques for treatment of ovarian endometriomas on ovarian reserve. We used two ultrasonographic markers for ovarian reserve: ovarian volume and antral follicle count (AFC).
Sixty patients in reproductive age (18-42 years) were treated for a chronic pelvic pain or infertility in a tertiary hospital (University Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics in Skopje, R. Macedonia). The study was prospective and two laparoscopic techniques were used. All patients were with confirmed ultrasound diagnosis for ovarian endometriomas with diameter between 3 and 8 cm. Complete cystectomy was done in 30 patients (group A) and puncture with endocoagulation was done in other 30 patients (group B). Ovarian reserve was analyzed before surgery and was controlled one and three months after laparoscopic surgery.
In group A (operated with cystectomy) ovarian volume was 53.46±29.97 cm³ before surgery, which fell to 13.06±7.34 cm³ after one month, and 13.28±7.17 cm³ after three months. Statistical analysis showed a significant reduction in ovarian volume one and three months after surgery (p≤0.01). In group B (operated with puncture and endocoagulation) the ovarian volume was 58.34±37.99 cm³ before surgery, which fell to 18.96±7.90 cm³ one month and 17.38±6.86 cm³ three months after surgery. In both groups there was a significant reduction in ovarian volume one and three months postoperatively (p≤0.01). In the first group AFC was 3.03±1.27 before surgery, 4.8±1.30 one month after surgery and 6.23±1.57 after three months. Statistical analysis showed a significant increase in AFC after laparoscopic cystectomy (p≤0.01). In the second group AFC was 3.07±1.05 before surgery, 5.33±1.60 after one month and 7.0±1.62 after three months. The comparison of AFC showed high statistically significant difference (p≤0.001), e.g. increase of AFC after one and three months in comparison with AFC before surgery.
Ovarian reserve decreases after laparoscopic surgery using both laparoscopic techniques. But, this decrease was more frequent using cystectomy in comparison with ablation of the endometriotic cyst.
手术腹腔镜检查是治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿患者最常用的技术,因为与剖腹手术相比有许多积极效果。有多种腹腔镜技术,但最常用的是囊肿切除术以及对囊肿包膜进行穿刺并内凝(消融)。本研究的目的是评估两种腹腔镜技术治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿对卵巢储备功能的影响。我们使用了两种超声检查指标来评估卵巢储备功能:卵巢体积和窦卵泡计数(AFC)。
60名育龄期(18 - 42岁)患者在一家三级医院(马其顿共和国斯科普里大学妇产科诊所)因慢性盆腔疼痛或不孕接受治疗。该研究为前瞻性研究,采用了两种腹腔镜技术。所有患者经超声确诊为直径3至8厘米的卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿。30名患者进行了完整囊肿切除术(A组),另外30名患者进行了穿刺并内凝(B组)。在手术前分析卵巢储备功能,并在腹腔镜手术后1个月和3个月进行监测。
A组(行囊肿切除术)术前卵巢体积为53.46±29.97立方厘米,术后1个月降至13.06±7.34立方厘米,术后3个月降至13.28±7.17立方厘米。统计分析显示术后1个月和3个月卵巢体积显著减小(p≤0.01)。B组(行穿刺并内凝)术前卵巢体积为58.34±37.99立方厘米,术后1个月降至18.96±7.90立方厘米,术后3个月降至17.38±6.86立方厘米。两组术后1个月和3个月卵巢体积均显著减小(p≤0.01)。第一组术前AFC为3.03±1.27,术后1个月为4.8±1.30,术后3个月为6.23±1.57。统计分析显示腹腔镜囊肿切除术后AFC显著增加(p≤0.01)。第二组术前AFC为3.07±1.05,术后1个月为5.33±1.60,术后3个月为7.0±1.62。AFC的比较显示出高度统计学显著差异(p≤0.001),即术后1个月和3个月的AFC与术前相比有所增加。
两种腹腔镜技术进行腹腔镜手术后卵巢储备功能均下降。但是,与子宫内膜异位囊肿消融术相比,囊肿切除术导致这种下降更为常见。