Shin Sooyoung
Ajou University College of Pharmacy, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 May 24;11:649-57. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S81759. eCollection 2015.
Stress ulcers and related upper gastrointestinal bleeding are well-known complications in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) has been widely prescribed in noncritically ill patients who are at low risk for clinically significant bleeding, which is then injudiciously continued after hospital discharge. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of inappropriate prescribing of PPI-based preventative therapy in ICU versus non-ICU patients that subsequently continued postdischarge, and to estimate the costs incurred by the unwarranted outpatient continuation of PPI therapy.
A retrospective review of patient data at a major teaching hospital in Korea was performed. During the 4-year study period, adult patients who were newly initiated on PPI-based SUP during hospital admission and subsequently discharged on a PPI without a medical indication for such therapy were captured for data analysis. The incidence rates of inappropriate prescribing of PPIs were compared between ICU and non-ICU patients, and the costs associated with such therapy were also examined.
A total of 4,410 patients, more than half of the inpatient-initiated PPI users, were deemed to have been inadvertently prescribed a PPI at discharge in the absence of a medical need for acid suppression. The incidence of inappropriate outpatient continuation of the prophylaxis was higher among ICU patients compared with non-ICU patients (57.7% versus 52.2%, respectively; P=0.001). The total expenditure accrued through the continuation of nonindicated PPI therapy was approximately US$40,175.
This study confirmed that excess usage of PPIs for SUP has spread to low-risk, non-ICU patients. The overuse of unwarranted PPI therapy can incur large health care expenditure, as well as clinical complications with minimal therapeutic benefits. Educating clinicians regarding SUP guidelines and the adverse effects of long-term use of acid suppression can improve the cost effectiveness of PPI therapy.
应激性溃疡及相关上消化道出血是重症监护病房(ICU)患者中众所周知的并发症。基于质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的应激性溃疡预防(SUP)已在临床显著出血低风险的非重症患者中广泛应用,且在出院后仍被不合理地继续使用。本研究旨在评估ICU患者与非ICU患者中基于PPI的预防性治疗不当处方的发生率,这些不当处方在出院后仍继续存在,并估算PPI治疗在门诊无必要继续使用所产生的费用。
对韩国一家大型教学医院的患者数据进行回顾性分析。在4年的研究期间,纳入入院时新开始基于PPI的SUP治疗、出院时无该治疗医学指征却继续使用PPI的成年患者进行数据分析。比较ICU患者与非ICU患者中PPI不当处方的发生率,并检查与此类治疗相关的费用。
共有4410例患者,超过半数住院期间开始使用PPI的患者,被认为在出院时在无抑制胃酸医学需求的情况下被无意处方了PPI。与非ICU患者相比,ICU患者中预防性治疗门诊不当继续使用的发生率更高(分别为57.7%和52.2%;P = 0.001)。因继续使用无指征的PPI治疗产生的总支出约为40175美元。
本研究证实,用于SUP的PPI过度使用已蔓延至低风险的非ICU患者。不必要的PPI治疗过度使用会产生大量医疗保健支出,以及临床并发症,而治疗益处极小。对临床医生进行SUP指南及长期使用抑酸药物不良反应的教育可提高PPI治疗的成本效益。