Paknejad Mojgan, Rokn AmirReza, Rouzmeh Nina, Heidari Mohadeseh, Titidej Azadehzeinab, Kharazifard Mohammad Javad, Mehrfard Ali
Associtate Professor, Dental Research Center Dentistry Research Institute, Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ; Dental Implant Research Center, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Dental Implant Research Center, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ; Professor, Department of Periodontoics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Jan;12(1):31-8.
Considering the importance of bone augmentation prior to implant placement in order to obtain adequate bone quality and quantity, many studies have been conducted to evaluate different techniques and materials regarding new bone formation. In this study, we investigated the bone healing capacity of two different materials deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM with the trade name of Bio-Oss) and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA with the trade name of DynaGraft).
This randomized blinded prospective study was conducted on twelve New Zealand white rabbits. Three cranial defects with an equal diameter were created on their calvarium. Subsequently, they were distributed into three groups: 1. The control group without any treatment; 2. The Bio-Oss group; 3. The DynaGraft group. After 30 days, the animals were sacrificed for histologic and histomorphometric analysis.
Substantial new bone formation was observed in both groups. DynaGraft: 56/1 % ± 15/1 and Bio-Oss: 53/55 % ± 13/5 compared to the control group: 28/6 % ± 11/2. All groups showed slight inflammation and a small amount of residual biomaterial was observed.
Considerable new bone formation was demonstrated in both DynaGraft and Bio-Oss groups in comparison with the control group. Both materials are considered biocompatible regarding the negligible foreign body reaction.
考虑到在种植体植入前进行骨增量以获得足够的骨质量和骨量的重要性,已经开展了许多研究来评估关于新骨形成的不同技术和材料。在本研究中,我们调查了两种不同材料——脱蛋白牛骨矿物质(商品名为Bio-Oss的DBBM)和脱矿冻干骨同种异体移植物(商品名为DynaGraft的DFDBA)的骨愈合能力。
本随机双盲前瞻性研究在12只新西兰白兔身上进行。在它们的颅骨上制造三个直径相等的颅骨缺损。随后,将它们分为三组:1. 未进行任何处理的对照组;2. Bio-Oss组;3. DynaGraft组。30天后,处死动物进行组织学和组织形态计量学分析。
两组均观察到大量新骨形成。DynaGraft组:56/1%±15/1,Bio-Oss组:53/55%±13/5,而对照组为:28/6%±11/2。所有组均显示轻微炎症,且观察到少量残留生物材料。
与对照组相比,DynaGraft组和Bio-Oss组均显示出大量新骨形成。考虑到异物反应可忽略不计,两种材料均被认为具有生物相容性。