CenoBoen/CenoMembrane与Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide两种复合物用于侧方牙槽嵴增高的组织学、组织形态计量学及影像学比较：一项临床试验
A histologic, histomorphometric, and radiographic comparison between two complexes of CenoBoen/CenoMembrane and Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide in lateral ridge augmentation: A clinical trial.
作者信息
Amoian Babak, Moudi Ehsan, Majidi Maryam Seyed, Ali Tabatabaei S M
机构信息
Departments of Periodontology, Oral Health Center, Dental Faculty, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Faculty, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
出版信息
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2016 Sep;13(5):446-453. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.192304.
BACKGROUND
Several grafting materials have been used for alveolar ridge augmentation. The literature lacks researches to compare CenoBone to other grafting materials. The aim of this study was to compare CenoBone/CenoMembrane complex to Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide complex in lateral alveolar bone augmentation in terms of radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this randomized controlled trial, ten patients who needed lateral ridge augmentation were selected and augmentations were done using either of CenoBone/CenoMembrane or Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide complexes. In the re-entry surgery in 6 months following augmentation, core biopsies were taken and clinical, radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric evaluations were performed.
RESULTS
No statistically significant difference was seen between groups except for the number of blood vessels and percentage of residual graft materials.
CONCLUSION
CenoBone seems to present a comparable lateral ridge augmentation to Bio-Oss in.
背景
几种移植材料已用于牙槽嵴增高术。文献中缺乏将CenoBone与其他移植材料进行比较的研究。本研究的目的是在影像学、组织学和组织形态计量学参数方面，比较CenoBone/CenoMembrane复合物与Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide复合物在外侧牙槽骨增高术中的效果。
材料与方法
在这项随机对照试验中，选择了10名需要外侧牙槽嵴增高的患者，并使用CenoBone/CenoMembrane或Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide复合物进行增高术。在增高术后6个月的再次手术中，采集核心活检组织，并进行临床、影像学、组织学和组织形态计量学评估。
结果
除血管数量和残余移植材料百分比外，两组之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。
结论
CenoBone在外侧牙槽嵴增高术中似乎与Bio-Oss具有相当的效果。
Zotero 插件