Ahmad Rohana, Chen Junning, Abu-Hassan Mohamed I, Li Qing, Swain Michael V
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 May-Jun;30(3):657-66. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3844.
This study aimed to investigate and compare the residual ridge resorption (RRR) induced by an implant-retained overdenture (IRO) and associative biomechanics and by a conventional complete denture (CD) without implants.
Cone beam computed tomography was used to quantify RRR in a three-dimensional (3D) manner before and after 1 year of treatment with either IROs or CDs. Twenty patients were treated with IROs, and nine patients were treated with CDs in the mandible. Their maximum bite forces were recorded. The same sets of high-resolution scan images were used to create patient-specific 3D finite element analysis models. The hydrostatic stresses, contact surface deformation, and strain energy absorption in soft tissue mucosa were correlated with the changes in RRR for patients with and without implants.
With the IROs, contact surface deformation on the mucosa was two times greater than with CDs (0.32 ± 0.23 mm vs 0.16 ± 0.06 mm) and was in agreement with the amount of RRR measured, which was also two times higher for the IRO than the CD (-3.8% ± 4.5% vs -1.9% ± 0.4%). Taking into account the differences in bite forces with and without implants, which again were twice as high with IROs, the hydrostatic stress within the mucosa was found to correlate well to the RRR map measured over the 1-year interval of treatment.
IROs resulted in at least twice the RRR as CDs. This could be caused by the higher hydrostatic stress and less effective energy absorption capabilities of the mucosa underneath the IRO. While implants associated with the IRO provide stronger bite force, they could potentially concentrate hydrostatic stress and cause greater RRR compared to a conventional CD.
本研究旨在调查和比较种植体支持的覆盖义齿(IRO)及相关生物力学与无种植体的传统全口义齿(CD)所引起的剩余牙槽嵴吸收(RRR)情况。
采用锥形束计算机断层扫描以三维(3D)方式量化使用IRO或CD治疗1年后的RRR。20例患者接受IRO治疗,9例患者下颌接受CD治疗。记录他们的最大咬合力。使用相同的高分辨率扫描图像创建患者特异性的3D有限元分析模型。将软组织黏膜中的流体静应力、接触面变形和应变能吸收与有无种植体患者的RRR变化相关联。
使用IRO时,黏膜上的接触面变形比使用CD时大两倍(0.32±0.23毫米对0.16±0.06毫米),且与测量的RRR量一致,IRO的RRR量也比CD高两倍(-3.8%±4.5%对-1.9%±0.4%)。考虑到有无种植体时咬合力的差异,IRO的咬合力同样是两倍高,发现在治疗的1年间隔内,黏膜内的流体静应力与测量的RRR图谱相关性良好。
IRO导致的RRR至少是CD的两倍。这可能是由于IRO下方黏膜的流体静应力较高且能量吸收能力较差所致。虽然与IRO相关的种植体提供更强的咬合力,但与传统CD相比,它们可能会使流体静应力集中并导致更大的RRR。