• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项为期 3 年的前瞻性随机临床试验,评估了使用两种不同同种异体骨移植材料进行牙槽嵴保存后 4 个月植入种植体的临床功能 1、2 和 3 年时牙槽嵴顶反应和临床参数。

A 3-year prospective randomized clinical trial of alveolar bone crest response and clinical parameters through 1, 2, and 3 years of clinical function of implants placed 4 months after alveolar ridge preservation using two different allogeneic bone-grafting materials.

机构信息

Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Specialty Dental Practice Limited to Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Implant Dent. 2022 Feb 1;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00402-w.

DOI:10.1186/s40729-022-00402-w
PMID:35102440
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8804085/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to longitudinally evaluate changes in alveolar bone crest (ABC) levels and differences in resorption rates (RR) between the tested grafting materials following alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) after tooth extraction after 1, 2, and 3 years (T1-T8) of clinical function.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to two different bone allografts (group 1 maxgraft, group 2 Puros) for ARP. Non-restorable teeth were minimal traumatically extracted. Sockets were augmented with the tested materials and covered with a pericardium membrane. After 4 months of healing, 36 implants were placed and sites were clinically and radiographically monitored in the mesial (ABC-M), the distal (ABC-D, T1-T8), the bucco-lingual (ABC-BL), buccal (ABC-B) and oral (ABC-O) aspect (T1-T4).

RESULTS

Changes in (ABC-M), (ABC-D), (ABC-BL), (ABC-B), and (ABC-O) levels showed statistically highly significant differences between T1 and T2 for both bone allografts (p < 0.001). Changes at the ABC-M and ABC-BL levels between T2 and T3 of group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Both groups achieved and maintained increased ABC levels without statistically significant differences throughout the monitoring periods of 1-3 years (T6-T8) of clinical function. No failures or adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this study is within its limitations the first study to directly compare ABC-changes and differences in RR of two different allogeneic grafting materials for a period of 3 years after ARP. It was demonstrated to be, despite significant differences in RR, a successful method of preserving increased ABC levels through 1, 2, and 3 years of clinical function. Trial registration DRKS00013010, registered 07/30/2018, http://apps.who.int/trialsearch.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在纵向评估拔牙后牙槽嵴保存(ARP)后,经过 1、2、3 年(T1-T8)临床功能,两种测试移植物的牙槽嵴顶(ABC)水平变化和吸收率(RR)差异。

方法

患者被随机分配到两种不同的同种异体骨移植物(组 1 maxgraft,组 2 Puros)进行 ARP。非保留牙齿微创拔除。用测试材料进行牙槽窝扩增,并覆盖心包膜。愈合 4 个月后,植入 36 颗种植体,并在近中(ABC-M)、远中(ABC-D,T1-T8)、颊舌(ABC-BL)、颊侧(ABC-B)和口内(ABC-O)方向(T1-T4)进行临床和放射学监测。

结果

两种同种异体骨移植物在 T1 与 T2 之间,(ABC-M)、(ABC-D)、(ABC-BL)、(ABC-B)和(ABC-O)水平的变化均具有统计学高度显著差异(p<0.001)。组 1 在 T2 与 T3 之间,ABC-M 和 ABC-BL 水平的变化具有统计学显著差异(p<0.001)。两组在 1-3 年(T6-T8)的临床功能监测期间,均实现并维持 ABC 水平增加,无统计学显著差异。未观察到失败或不良反应。

结论

据我们所知,本研究在其局限性内,首次直接比较了两种不同同种异体移植物材料在 ARP 后 3 年的 ABC 变化和 RR 差异。结果表明,尽管 RR 存在显著差异,但该方法仍是一种成功的方法,可以通过 1、2、3 年的临床功能,维持 ABC 水平的增加。试验注册 DRKS00013010,于 2018 年 7 月 30 日注册,http://apps.who.int/trialsearch。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bafe/8804085/56642f8bd8c7/40729_2022_402_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bafe/8804085/bd39ece6c655/40729_2022_402_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bafe/8804085/56642f8bd8c7/40729_2022_402_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bafe/8804085/bd39ece6c655/40729_2022_402_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bafe/8804085/56642f8bd8c7/40729_2022_402_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A 3-year prospective randomized clinical trial of alveolar bone crest response and clinical parameters through 1, 2, and 3 years of clinical function of implants placed 4 months after alveolar ridge preservation using two different allogeneic bone-grafting materials.一项为期 3 年的前瞻性随机临床试验,评估了使用两种不同同种异体骨移植材料进行牙槽嵴保存后 4 个月植入种植体的临床功能 1、2 和 3 年时牙槽嵴顶反应和临床参数。
Int J Implant Dent. 2022 Feb 1;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00402-w.
2
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.缺失牙的修复干预:用于种植体位点开发的牙槽嵴保存技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 26;4(4):CD010176. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010176.pub3.
3
Clinical evaluation of different alveolar ridge preservation techniques after tooth extraction: a randomized clinical trial.拔牙后不同牙槽嵴保存技术的临床评价:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Aug;27(8):4471-4480. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05068-1. Epub 2023 May 25.
4
A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets: 3-year results.一项评估和比较在增强型和非增强型拔牙窝中植入物的随机临床试验:3 年结果。
J Periodontol. 2012 Jul;83(7):836-46. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110205. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
5
Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.拔牙后牙槽嵴保存干预的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46 Suppl 21:195-223. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13057.
6
Tissue changes of extraction sockets in humans: a comparison of spontaneous healing vs. ridge preservation with secondary soft tissue healing.人类拔牙窝的组织变化:自发愈合与采用二期软组织愈合的牙槽嵴保存的比较
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Nov;24(11):1231-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02535.x. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
7
Influence of platelet-rich fibrin on alveolar ridge preservation.富血小板纤维蛋白对牙槽嵴保存的影响。
J Craniofac Surg. 2013 Jul;24(4):1088-94. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828b6dc3.
8
Alveolar ridge changes 1-year after early implant placement, with or without alveolar ridge preservation at single-implant sites in the aesthetic region: A secondary analysis of radiographic and profilometric outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.种植体植入后 1 年牙槽嵴的变化,在美学区域单个种植体位点行或不行牙槽嵴保存的随机对照试验的影像学和轮廓测量学结果的二次分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024 Apr;26(2):356-368. doi: 10.1111/cid.13297. Epub 2023 Dec 17.
9
Preservation and augmentation of molar extraction sites affected by severe bone defect due to advanced periodontitis: A prospective clinical trial.因重度牙周炎导致严重骨缺损的磨牙拔牙位点的保存与修复:一项前瞻性临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Jun;20(3):333-344. doi: 10.1111/cid.12585. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
10
A one-year prospective study on alveolar ridge preservation using collagen-enriched deproteinized bovine bone mineral and saddle connective tissue graft: A cone beam computed tomography analysis.一项使用富含胶原的脱蛋白牛骨矿物质和鞍状结缔组织移植物进行牙槽嵴保存的为期一年的前瞻性研究:锥形束 CT 分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):853-861. doi: 10.1111/cid.12843. Epub 2019 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Bone Stability After Immediate Implants and Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A 15-Year Retrospective Clinical Study.即刻种植与牙槽嵴保存后的骨稳定性:一项15年的回顾性临床研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jul 2;13(7):299. doi: 10.3390/dj13070299.
2
Enhancement of in vitro and in vivo bone repair performance of decalcified bone/gelma by desferrioxamine.去铁胺增强脱钙骨/明胶甲基丙烯酸酯的体外和体内骨修复性能
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 23;15(1):14092. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99101-w.
3
Guided Bone Regeneration in the Posterior Mandible Using a Resorbable Metal Magnesium Membrane and Fixation Screws: A Case Report.

本文引用的文献

1
A 5-year cohort study on early implant placement with guided bone regeneration or alveolar ridge preservation with connective tissue graft.一项关于引导骨再生或使用结缔组织移植进行牙槽嵴保存的早期种植体植入的 5 年队列研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Dec;22(6):697-705. doi: 10.1111/cid.12948. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
2
Antibiotic dosage prescribed in oral implant surgery: A meta-analysis of cross-sectional surveys.口腔种植术中的抗生素剂量:横断面调查的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 18;15(8):e0236981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236981. eCollection 2020.
3
Antibiotic prophylaxis for implant placement: a systematic review of effects on reduction of implant failure.
使用可吸收金属镁膜和固定螺钉在下颌骨后部进行引导骨再生:病例报告
Case Rep Dent. 2024 Dec 13;2024:2659893. doi: 10.1155/crid/2659893. eCollection 2024.
4
Pericardium decellularization in a one-day, two-step protocol.采用一日两步法进行心包脱细胞处理。
Mol Cell Biochem. 2025 Mar;480(3):1819-1829. doi: 10.1007/s11010-024-05086-x. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
5
Advancements in alveolar bone grafting and ridge preservation: a narrative review on materials, techniques, and clinical outcomes.牙槽骨移植与牙槽嵴保存的进展:关于材料、技术和临床结果的叙述性综述
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Apr 16;46(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40902-024-00425-w.
6
Clinical and Biological Validation of an Allogeneous Cancellous Bone Block for Alveolar Maxillary Ridge Reconstruction: A Case Series.用于上颌牙槽嵴重建的同种异体松质骨块的临床和生物学验证:病例系列
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Feb 19;12(2):42. doi: 10.3390/dj12020042.
7
Characterization of immunologically detectable T-cell sensitization, Immunohistochemical detection of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and clinical parameters of patients after allogeneic intraoral bone grafting procedures: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial in humans.免疫检测可识别的 T 细胞致敏的特征、同种异体口腔骨移植术后患者的促炎细胞因子的免疫组织化学检测和临床参数:一项在人类中进行的前瞻性随机对照临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 10;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02584-6.
种植体植入前的抗生素预防:降低种植体失败率效果的系统评价。
Br Dent J. 2020 Jun;228(12):943-951. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-1649-9.
4
Antibiotic prophylaxis prescribing habits in oral implant surgery in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional survey.荷兰口腔种植术中抗生素预防用药习惯的横断面调查。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Dec 12;19(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0981-4.
5
Histomorphometric evaluation of different grafting materials used for alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同牙槽嵴保存用移植物的组织形态计量学评价:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;49(6):797-810. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
6
The Influence of Different Grafting Materials on Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review.不同移植材料对牙槽嵴保存的影响:一项系统评价
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2019 Sep 5;10(3):e6. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2019.10306. eCollection 2019 Jul-Sep.
7
Histological and immunohistochemical comparison of two different allogeneic bone grafting materials for alveolar ridge reconstruction: A prospective randomized trial in humans.两种不同同种异体骨移植材料用于牙槽嵴重建的组织学和免疫组织化学比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):1002-1016. doi: 10.1111/cid.12824. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
8
Management of the extraction socket and timing of implant placement: Consensus report and clinical recommendations of group 3 of the XV European Workshop in Periodontology.拔牙窝的处理和种植体植入时机:牙周病学第十五届欧洲研讨会第 3 组的共识报告和临床建议。
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46 Suppl 21:183-194. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13131.
9
Characterization of circulating DNA in plasma of patients after allogeneic bone grafting.检测异基因骨移植患者血浆中循环 DNA 特征。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Dec;23(12):4243-4253. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02867-3. Epub 2019 Mar 3.
10
Self-regenerative capacity of intra-oral bone defects.口腔内骨缺损的自我再生能力。
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46 Suppl 21:70-81. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13075.