Bertisch Hilary, Kalpakjian Claire Z, Kisala Pamela A, Tulsky David S
J Spinal Cord Med. 2015 May;38(3):356-65. doi: 10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000024.
To develop an item response theory (IRT)-calibrated spinal cord injury (SCI)-specific Positive Affect and Well-being (PAWB) item bank with flexible options for administration.
Qualitative feedback from patient and provider focus groups was used to expand on the Neurological Disorders and Quality of Life (Neuro-QOL) positive affect & well-being item bank for use in SCI. New items were created and revised based on expert review and patient feedback and were then field tested. Analyses included confirmatory factor analysis, graded response IRT modeling and evaluation of differential item functioning (DIF).
We tested a 32-item pool at several rehabilitation centers across the United States, including the University of Michigan, Kessler Foundation, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, the University of Washington, Craig Hospital and the James J. Peters/Bronx Department of Veterans Affairs hospital.
A total of 717 individuals with SCI answered the PAWB questions.
A unidimensional model was observed (Confirmatory Fit Index=0.947; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.094) and measurement precision was good (reliability in theta of -2.9 to 1.2 is roughly equivalent to classical reliability of 0.95 or above). Twelve items were flagged for DIF, however, after examination of effect sizes, the DIF was determined to be negligible and would have little practical impact on score estimates. The final calibrated item bank resulted in 28 retained items
This study indicates that the Spinal Cord Injury--Quality of Life PAWB bank represents a psychometrically robust measurement tool. Short form items are also suggested and a computer adaptive test is available.
开发一种经过项目反应理论(IRT)校准的脊髓损伤(SCI)特异性积极情感与幸福感(PAWB)题库,并具备灵活的施测选项。
来自患者和提供者焦点小组的定性反馈被用于扩展神经疾病与生活质量(Neuro-QOL)积极情感与幸福感题库,以用于SCI。基于专家评审和患者反馈创建并修订新题目,然后进行现场测试。分析包括验证性因素分析、等级反应IRT建模以及项目功能差异(DIF)评估。
我们在美国的几个康复中心对一个包含32个条目的题库进行了测试,这些中心包括密歇根大学、凯斯勒基金会、芝加哥康复研究所、华盛顿大学、克雷格医院以及詹姆斯·J·彼得斯/布朗克斯退伍军人事务部医院。
共有717名脊髓损伤患者回答了PAWB问题。
观察到一个单维模型(验证性拟合指数=0.947;近似均方根误差=0.094),测量精度良好(θ值在-2.9至1.2之间的信度大致相当于经典信度0.95或更高)。有12个项目被标记为存在DIF,然而,在检查效应量后,确定DIF可忽略不计,对分数估计几乎没有实际影响。最终校准后的题库保留了28个项目。
本研究表明脊髓损伤生活质量PAWB题库是一种心理测量学上稳健的测量工具。还建议了简短形式的题目,并且提供了计算机自适应测试。