Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤后悲伤与丧失的测量:脊髓损伤生活质量量表(SCI-QOL)悲伤与丧失项目库及简表的开发、验证与心理测量学特征

Measuring grief and loss after spinal cord injury: Development, validation and psychometric characteristics of the SCI-QOL Grief and Loss item bank and short form.

作者信息

Kalpakjian Claire Z, Tulsky David S, Kisala Pamela A, Bombardier Charles H

出版信息

J Spinal Cord Med. 2015 May;38(3):347-55. doi: 10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000015.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop an item response theory (IRT) calibrated Grief and Loss item bank as part of the Spinal Cord Injury--Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) measurement system.

DESIGN

A literature review guided framework development of grief/loss. New items were created from focus groups. Items were revised based on expert review and patient feedback and were then field tested. Analyses included confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), graded response IRT modeling and evaluation of differential item functioning (DIF).

SETTING

We tested a 20-item pool at several rehabilitation centers across the United States, including the University of Michigan, Kessler Foundation, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, the University of Washington, Craig Hospital and the James J. Peters/Bronx Department of Veterans Affairs hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 717 individuals with SCI answered the grief and loss questions.

RESULTS

The final calibrated item bank resulted in 17 retained items. A unidimensional model was observed (CFI=0.976; RMSEA=0.078) and measurement precision was good (theta range between -1.48 to 2.48). Ten items were flagged for DIF, however, after examination of effect sizes found this to be negligible with little practical impact on score estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that the SCI-QOL Grief and Loss item bank represents a psychometrically robust measurement tool. Short form items are also suggested and computer adaptive tests are available.

摘要

目的

开发一个经过项目反应理论(IRT)校准的悲伤与失落项目库,作为脊髓损伤生活质量(SCI-QOL)测量系统的一部分。

设计

通过文献综述指导悲伤/失落框架的开发。从焦点小组中创建新项目。根据专家评审和患者反馈对项目进行修订,然后进行实地测试。分析包括验证性因素分析(CFA)、等级反应IRT建模和项目功能差异(DIF)评估。

地点

我们在美国的几个康复中心测试了一个包含20个项目的题库,包括密歇根大学、凯斯勒基金会、芝加哥康复研究所、华盛顿大学、克雷格医院以及詹姆斯·J·彼得斯/布朗克斯退伍军人事务部医院。

参与者

共有717名脊髓损伤患者回答了悲伤与失落相关问题。

结果

最终校准后的项目库保留了17个项目。观察到一个单维模型(CFI = 0.976;RMSEA = 0.078),测量精度良好(θ范围在 -1.48至2.48之间)。有10个项目被标记为存在DIF,但在检查效应大小后发现其可忽略不计,对分数估计几乎没有实际影响。

结论

本研究表明,SCI-QOL悲伤与失落项目库是一种心理测量学上稳健的测量工具。还建议了简短形式的项目,并且有计算机自适应测试可用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc6/4445025/260a45d3c706/scm-38-347.01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验