Suppr超能文献

意义不明的三相波脑电图模式患者对抗惊厥试验的反应率

Response Rates to Anticonvulsant Trials in Patients with Triphasic-Wave EEG Patterns of Uncertain Significance.

作者信息

O'Rourke Deirdre, Chen Patrick M, Gaspard Nicolas, Foreman Brandon, McClain Lauren, Karakis Ioannis, Mahulikar Advait, Westover M Brandon

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, WACC 735, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

Hôpital Erasme - ULB, Cliniques universitaires de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2016 Apr;24(2):233-9. doi: 10.1007/s12028-015-0151-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Generalized triphasic waves (TPWs) occur in both metabolic encephalopathies and non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). Empiric trials of benzodiazepines (BZDs) or non-sedating AED (NSAEDs) are commonly used to differentiate the two, but the utility of such trials is debated. The goal of this study was to assess response rates of such trials and investigate whether metabolic profile differences affect the likelihood of a response.

METHODS

Three institutions within the Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium retrospectively identified patients with unexplained encephalopathy and TPWs who had undergone a trial of BZD and/or NSAEDs to differentiate between ictal and non-ictal patterns. We assessed responder rates and compared metabolic profiles of responders and non-responders. Response was defined as resolution of the EEG pattern and either unequivocal improvement in encephalopathy or appearance of previously absent normal EEG patterns, and further categorized as immediate (within <2 h of trial initiation) or delayed (>2 h from trial initiation).

RESULTS

We identified 64 patients with TPWs who had an empiric trial of BZD and/or NSAED. Most patients (71.9%) were admitted with metabolic derangements and/or infection. Positive clinical responses occurred in 10/53 (18.9%) treated with BZDs. Responses to NSAEDs occurred in 19/45 (42.2%), being immediate in 6.7%, delayed but definite in 20.0%, and delayed but equivocal in 15.6%. Overall, 22/64 (34.4%) showed a definite response to either BZDs or NSAEDs, and 7/64 (10.9%) showed a possible response. Metabolic differences of responders versus non-responders were statistically insignificant, except that the 48-h low value of albumin in the BZD responder group was lower than in the non-responder group.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar metabolic profiles in patients with encephalopathy and TPWs between responders and non-responders to anticonvulsants suggest that predicting responders a priori is difficult. The high responder rate suggests that empiric trials of anticonvulsants indeed provide useful clinical information. The more than twofold higher response rate to NSAEDs suggests that this strategy may be preferable to BZDs. Further prospective investigation is warranted.

摘要

背景

全身性三相波(TPWs)可见于代谢性脑病和非惊厥性癫痫持续状态(NCSE)。苯二氮䓬类药物(BZDs)或非镇静性抗癫痫药物(NSAEDs)的经验性试验常用于鉴别这两种情况,但此类试验的效用存在争议。本研究的目的是评估此类试验的反应率,并调查代谢谱差异是否会影响反应的可能性。

方法

重症监护脑电图监测研究联盟的三个机构回顾性地确定了患有不明原因脑病和TPWs且接受过BZD和/或NSAEDs试验以区分发作期和非发作期模式的患者。我们评估了反应率,并比较了反应者和无反应者的代谢谱。反应定义为脑电图模式的消失以及脑病明确改善或出现先前未出现的正常脑电图模式,并进一步分为即刻反应(试验开始后<2小时内)或延迟反应(试验开始后>2小时)。

结果

我们确定了64例患有TPWs且接受过BZD和/或NSAEDs经验性试验的患者。大多数患者(71.9%)因代谢紊乱和/或感染入院。接受BZDs治疗的患者中有10/53(18.9%)出现阳性临床反应。接受NSAEDs治疗的患者中有19/45(42.2%)出现反应,其中6.7%为即刻反应,20.0%为延迟但明确的反应,15.6%为延迟但不明确的反应。总体而言,22/64(34.4%)对BZDs或NSAEDs有明确反应,7/64(10.9%)有可能反应。反应者与无反应者的代谢差异无统计学意义,除了BZD反应者组白蛋白的48小时低值低于无反应者组。

结论

抗惊厥药物反应者和无反应者中,脑病和TPWs患者的代谢谱相似,这表明很难预先预测反应者。高反应率表明抗惊厥药物的经验性试验确实提供了有用的临床信息。对NSAEDs的反应率高出两倍多,这表明该策略可能优于BZDs。有必要进行进一步的前瞻性研究。

相似文献

3
Ictal and interictal EEG patterns in patients with nonconvulsive and subtle convulsive status epilepticus.
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Aug;49:263-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
6
Triphasic waves.
Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol. 2011 Mar;51(1):16-25.
7
Initial EEG in status epilepticus is helpful in predicting seizure recurrence.
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 May-Jun;46(3):139-44.
8
Levetiracetam as a treatment option in non-convulsive status epilepticus.
Epilepsy Res. 2007 Mar;73(3):238-44. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2006.10.011. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
10
Effects of benzodiazepines on triphasic waves: implications for nonconvulsive status epilepticus.
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Jul;18(4):345-52. doi: 10.1097/00004691-200107000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Controversies: Periodic discharges in critically ill patients -" urgent treatment is essential".
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2025 Jul 5;10:286-291. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2025.06.010. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical analysis of 20 cases of brain injury caused by diabetic ketoacidosis in children.
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jul 23;25(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05927-8.
3
Triphasic waves: To treat or not to treat?
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2025 Jun 27;10:265-277. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2025.06.001. eCollection 2025.
5
Utility and rationale for continuous EEG monitoring: a primer for the general intensivist.
Crit Care. 2024 Jul 16;28(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04986-0.
6
Generalized Periodic Discharges Associated With Catatonia and Delirium: A Case Series.
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Fall;36(4):340-343. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230174. Epub 2024 May 9.
7
Hypsarrhythmia and triphasic waves seem to be akin(similar) age-dependent responses of the brain to different insults.
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2024 Jan-Mar;15(1):156-158. doi: 10.25259/JNRP_319_2023. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
8
Association of Epileptiform Activity With Outcomes in Toxic-Metabolic Encephalopathy.
Crit Care Explor. 2023 May 5;5(5):e0913. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000913. eCollection 2023 May.
9
Electroencephalogram in the intensive care unit: a focused look at acute brain injury.
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Oct;48(10):1443-1462. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06854-3. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
10
Case Report: Triphasic Waves in a 9-Year-Old Girl With Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis.
Front Neurol. 2022 Jan 25;13:819209. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.819209. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Significance of triphasic waves in patients with acute encephalopathy: a nine-year cohort study.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Oct;124(10):1952-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.03.031. Epub 2013 May 15.
2
American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology: 2012 version.
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Feb;30(1):1-27. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e3182784729.
3
Electroencephalographic criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus: synopsis and comprehensive survey.
Epilepsia. 2012 Aug;53 Suppl 3:1-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03593.x.
4
Nonconvulsive status epilepticus: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in the intensive care setting.
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2011 May;4(3):169-81. doi: 10.1177/1756285611403826.
5
How I treat patients with EEG patterns on the ictal-interictal continuum in the neuro ICU.
Neurocrit Care. 2009 Dec;11(3):437-44. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9295-8.
6
Significance of atypical triphasic waves for diagnosing nonconvulsive status epilepticus.
Epilepsy Behav. 2007 Dec;11(4):567-77. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.07.014. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
7
Nonconvulsive seizures: developing a rational approach to the diagnosis and management in the critically ill population.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Aug;118(8):1660-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.11.312. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
8
Lithium-induced confusional states: nonconvulsive status epilepticus or triphasic encephalopathy?
Epilepsia. 2006 Dec;47(12):2071-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00849.x.
9
Triphasic waves versus nonconvulsive status epilepticus: EEG distinction.
Can J Neurol Sci. 2006 May;33(2):175-80. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100004935.
10
EEG in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 May;117(5):935-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.007. Epub 2006 Jan 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验