School of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FMUSP), Brazil.
J Telemed Telecare. 2020 Apr;26(3):140-149. doi: 10.1177/1357633X18800856. Epub 2018 Sep 30.
To assess the performance of a tablet-based tele-audiometry method for automated hearing screening of schoolchildren through a comparison of the results of various hearing screening approaches.
A total of 244 children were evaluated. Tablet-based screening results were compared with gold-standard pure-tone audiometry. Acoustic immittance measurements were also conducted. To pass the tablet-based screening, the children were required to respond to at least two out of three sounds for all the frequencies in each ear. Several hearing screening methods were analysed: exclusively tablet-based (with and without 500 Hz checked) and combined tests (series and parallel). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy were calculated.
A total of 9.43% of children presented with mild to moderate conductive hearing loss (unilateral or bilateral). Diagnostic values varied among the different hearing screening approaches that were evaluated: sensitivities ranged from 60 to 95%, specificities ranged from 44 to 91%, positive predictive values ranged from 15 to 44%, negative predictive values ranged from 95 to 99%, accuracy values ranged from 49 to 88%, and area under curve values ranged from 0.690 to 0.883. Regarding diagnostic values, the highest results were found for the tablet-based screening method and for the series approach.
Compared with the results obtained by conventional audiometry and considering the diagnostic values of the different hearing screening approaches, the highest diagnostic values were generally obtained using the automated hearing screening method (including 500 Hz). Thus, this application, which was developed for the tablet computer, was shown to be a valuable hearing screening tool for use with schoolchildren. Therefore, we suggest that this hearing screening protocol has the potential to improve asynchronous tele-audiology service delivery.
通过比较各种听力筛查方法的结果,评估基于平板电脑的远程听力测试方法在儿童自动听力筛查中的性能。
共评估了 244 名儿童。将基于平板电脑的筛查结果与纯音测听的金标准进行比较。还进行了声导抗测量。为了通过基于平板电脑的筛查,儿童需要对每只耳朵的所有频率中的至少两个声音做出反应。分析了几种听力筛查方法:仅基于平板电脑(检查 500Hz 与否)和联合测试(串联和并联)。计算了灵敏度、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及准确性。
共有 9.43%的儿童患有单侧或双侧轻至中度传导性听力损失。不同听力筛查方法的诊断值不同:灵敏度从 60%到 95%不等,特异性从 44%到 91%不等,阳性预测值从 15%到 44%不等,阴性预测值从 95%到 99%不等,准确性值从 49%到 88%不等,曲线下面积值从 0.690 到 0.883 不等。关于诊断值,基于平板电脑的筛查方法和串联方法的结果最高。
与传统听力测试相比,并考虑到不同听力筛查方法的诊断值,自动听力筛查方法(包括 500Hz)通常获得最高的诊断值。因此,这种专为平板电脑开发的应用程序被证明是一种有价值的儿童听力筛查工具。因此,我们建议该听力筛查方案有可能改善异步远程听力服务的提供。