Tseng Chia-Huei, Gobell Joetta L, Sperling George
Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China.
Frank N. Magid, Associates, Inc., New York NY, USA.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 9;9:182. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00182. eCollection 2015.
We report here a windsurfer illusion, a naturally occurring trapezoidal illusion in which the small end of the sail viewed at a distance appears to be pointed away from the observer even when it is closer. This naturally occurring illusion is so compelling that observers are unaware of their gross perceptual misinterpretation of the scene. Four laboratory experiment of this kind of trapezoidal illusion investigated the joint effects of retinal orientation, head position, relative motion, and the relative direction of gravity on automatic depth perception. Observers viewed two adjacent white trapezoids outlined on a black background rotating back and forth ± 20° on a vertical axis much like the sails of two adjacent windsurfers. Observers reported which side of the trapezoids (long or short) appeared to be closer to them (i.e., in front). The longer edge of the trapezoid was reported in front 76 ± 2% of trials ("windsurfer effect") whether it was on the left or on the right. When the display was rotated 90°to produce a runway configuration, there was a striking asymmetry: the long edge was perceived to be in front 97% when it was on the bottom but only 43% when it was on top ("runway effect"). The runway effect persisted when the head was tilted 90° or when displays on the ceiling were viewed from the floor. Ninety-five percent of the variance of the variance in the strikingly different 3D perceptions produced by the same 2D trapezoid image was quantitatively explained by a model that assumes there are just three additive bias factors that account for perceiving an edge as closer: Implicit linear perspective, lower position on the retina (based on an automatic assumption of viewing from above), and being lower in world coordinates.
我们在此报告一种帆板错觉,这是一种自然发生的梯形错觉,在其中,远处看到的帆的小端即使实际上更靠近观察者,看起来也像是指向远离观察者的方向。这种自然发生的错觉非常令人信服,以至于观察者并未意识到他们对场景存在严重的感知错误解读。四项关于此类梯形错觉的实验室实验研究了视网膜方向、头部位置、相对运动以及重力相对方向对自动深度感知的联合影响。观察者观看在黑色背景上勾勒出的两个相邻白色梯形,它们在垂直轴上来回旋转±20°,很像两个相邻帆板的帆。观察者报告梯形的哪一侧(长边或短边)看起来离他们更近(即在前面)。无论长边在左侧还是右侧,在76±2%的试验中,梯形的长边被报告为在前面(“帆板效应”)。当显示器旋转90°以形成跑道配置时,出现了显著的不对称性:当长边在底部时,97%的情况下被感知为在前面,但当长边在顶部时,只有43%的情况如此(“跑道效应”)。当头部倾斜90°或从地板观看天花板上的显示器时,跑道效应仍然存在。由相同二维梯形图像产生的截然不同的三维感知差异中,95%的方差可以通过一个模型进行定量解释,该模型假设只有三个相加的偏差因素可以解释将一条边感知为更近:隐式线性透视、视网膜上较低的位置(基于从上方观看的自动假设)以及在世界坐标中较低的位置。