Suppr超能文献

电子束监测的统计过程控制

Statistical process control for electron beam monitoring.

作者信息

López-Tarjuelo Juan, Luquero-Llopis Naika, García-Mollá Rafael, Quirós-Higueras Juan David, Bouché-Babiloni Ana, Juan-Senabre Xavier Jordi, de Marco-Blancas Noelia, Ferrer-Albiach Carlos, Santos-Serra Agustín

机构信息

Servicio de Radiofísica y Protección Radiológica, Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, Avda. Dr. Clará 19, Castellón de la Plana 12002, Castellón, Spain.

Fundación Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Avda. Dr. Clará 19, Castellón de la Plana 12002, Castellón, Spain.

出版信息

Phys Med. 2015 Jul;31(5):493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 May 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the electron beam monitoring statistical process control (SPC) in linear accelerator (linac) daily quality control. We present a long-term record of our measurements and evaluate which SPC-led conditions are feasible for maintaining control.

METHODS

We retrieved our linac beam calibration, symmetry, and flatness daily records for all electron beam energies from January 2008 to December 2013, and retrospectively studied how SPC could have been applied and which of its features could be used in the future. A set of adjustment interventions designed to maintain these parameters under control was also simulated.

RESULTS

All phase I data was under control. The dose plots were characterized by rising trends followed by steep drops caused by our attempts to re-center the linac beam calibration. Where flatness and symmetry trends were detected they were less-well defined. The process capability ratios ranged from 1.6 to 9.3 at a 2% specification level. Simulated interventions ranged from 2% to 34% of the total number of measurement sessions. We also noted that if prospective SPC had been applied it would have met quality control specifications.

CONCLUSIONS

SPC can be used to assess the inherent variability of our electron beam monitoring system. It can also indicate whether a process is capable of maintaining electron parameters under control with respect to established specifications by using a daily checking device, but this is not practical unless a method to establish direct feedback from the device to the linac can be devised.

摘要

目的

评估直线加速器(linac)日常质量控制中的电子束监测统计过程控制(SPC)。我们展示了我们测量的长期记录,并评估哪些由SPC主导的条件对于维持控制是可行的。

方法

我们检索了2008年1月至2013年12月所有电子束能量的直线加速器束流校准、对称性和平坦度的日常记录,并回顾性研究了SPC如何应用以及其哪些特征可在未来使用。还模拟了一组旨在将这些参数维持在可控范围内的调整干预措施。

结果

所有第一阶段数据均处于受控状态。剂量图的特征是呈上升趋势,随后由于我们试图重新调整直线加速器束流校准而出现急剧下降。在检测到平坦度和对称性趋势的地方,它们的定义不太明确。在2%的规格水平下,过程能力比范围为1.6至9.3。模拟干预措施占测量总次数的2%至34%。我们还注意到,如果应用前瞻性SPC,它将符合质量控制规格。

结论

SPC可用于评估我们电子束监测系统的固有变异性。它还可以通过使用日常检查设备来表明一个过程是否能够将电子参数维持在既定规格的控制之下,但除非能够设计出一种从设备到直线加速器建立直接反馈的方法,否则这并不实际。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验