• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis.使用麻醉后护理工具(PACT)将术后风险降至最低:一项前瞻性观察性研究和成本效益分析的方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 1;5(6):e007200. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007200.
2
Effect of a newly designed observation, response and discharge chart in the Post Anaesthesia Care Unit on patient outcomes: a quasi-expermental study in Australia.麻醉后护理单元中一种新设计的观察、反应及出院图表对患者预后的影响:澳大利亚的一项准实验研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 3;7(12):e015149. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015149.
3
Refining nursing assessment and management with a new postanaesthetic care discharge tool to minimize surgical patient risk.用新的麻醉后护理出院工具完善护理评估和管理,以最大程度降低手术患者风险。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Nov;74(11):2566-2576. doi: 10.1111/jan.13779. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
4
Post-anaesthetic discharge scoring criteria: key findings from a systematic review.麻醉后出院评分标准:系统评价的主要结果。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2013 Dec;11(4):275-84. doi: 10.1111/1744-1609.12044.
5
An observational study of patient care outcomes sensitive to handover quality in the Post-Anaesthetic Care Unit.术后复苏室中交接质量敏感的患者护理结果的观察性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):4786-4794. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13833. Epub 2017 May 19.
6
The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the PAtient-Centred Team (PACT) model: study protocol of a prospective matched control before-and-after study.以患者为中心的团队(PACT)模式的有效性和成本效益:一项前瞻性配对对照前后研究的研究方案
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Oct 23;15:133. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0133-x.
7
8
Post-anaesthetic discharge scoring criteria: A systematic review.麻醉后出院评分标准:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2011;9(41):1679-1713. doi: 10.11124/01938924-201109410-00001.
9
Recovery at the post anaesthetic care unit after breast cancer surgery.乳腺癌手术后在麻醉后护理单元的恢复情况。
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Feb;57(2):A4137.
10
Nonclinical Factors Affecting PACU Discharge: A Clinical Audit in a One-Day Surgery Unit.影响麻醉后恢复室出院的非临床因素:一日手术单元的临床审计
J Perianesth Nurs. 2018 Oct;33(5):676-680. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2016.11.012. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Effect of SAMPE and ALDERTE Checklists on the Incidence of Complications After Discharge of Radical Prostatectomy Patients from the Post-anesthesia Care Unit (PACU).SAMPE和ALDERTE检查表对前列腺癌根治术后患者从麻醉后恢复室(PACU)出院后并发症发生率影响的比较。
Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):e156738. doi: 10.5812/aapm-156738. eCollection 2025 Feb 28.
2
Incidence and factors associated with post-anesthesia care unit complications in resource-limited settings: An observational study.资源有限环境下麻醉后护理单元并发症的发生率及相关因素:一项观察性研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2022 May 23;5(3):e649. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.649. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Adverse Respiratory Events Increase Post-anesthesia Care Unit Stay in China: A 2-year Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.不良呼吸事件增加中国麻醉后监护病房停留时间:一项为期 2 年的回顾性匹配队列研究。
Curr Med Sci. 2019 Apr;39(2):325-329. doi: 10.1007/s11596-019-2038-y. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
4
Effect of a newly designed observation, response and discharge chart in the Post Anaesthesia Care Unit on patient outcomes: a quasi-expermental study in Australia.麻醉后护理单元中一种新设计的观察、反应及出院图表对患者预后的影响:澳大利亚的一项准实验研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 3;7(12):e015149. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015149.

本文引用的文献

1
Post-anaesthetic discharge scoring criteria: A systematic review.麻醉后出院评分标准:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2011;9(41):1679-1713. doi: 10.11124/01938924-201109410-00001.
2
Determining criteria to assess patient readiness for discharge from postanaesthetic care: an international Delphi study.确定评估患者麻醉后护理出院准备情况的标准:一项国际德尔菲研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Dec;23(23-24):3345-55. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12576. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
3
Post-anaesthetic discharge scoring criteria: key findings from a systematic review.麻醉后出院评分标准:系统评价的主要结果。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2013 Dec;11(4):275-84. doi: 10.1111/1744-1609.12044.
4
Hospital quality and the cost of inpatient surgery in the United States.美国医院质量与住院手术费用
Ann Surg. 2012 Jan;255(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182402c17.
5
Incidence, nature and impact of error in surgery.手术差错的发生率、性质和影响。
Br J Surg. 2011 Nov;98(11):1654-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7594. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
6
The role of documents and documentation in communication failure across the perioperative pathway. A literature review.文件和文件记录在围手术期沟通失败中的作用。文献回顾。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Aug;48(8):1024-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
7
The incidence, root-causes, and outcomes of adverse events in surgical units: implication for potential prevention strategies.外科病房不良事件的发生率、根本原因及后果:对潜在预防策略的启示
Patient Saf Surg. 2011 May 20;5:13. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-5-13.
8
Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes.综合手术安全系统对患者结局的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 11;363(20):1928-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0911535.
9
iSoBAR--a concept and handover checklist: the National Clinical Handover Initiative.iSoBAR——一个概念与交接清单:国家临床交接倡议
Med J Aust. 2009 Jun 1;190(S11):S152-6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02625.x.
10
An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data.全球手术量的估计:基于现有数据的建模策略。
Lancet. 2008 Jul 12;372(9633):139-144. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60878-8. Epub 2008 Jun 24.

使用麻醉后护理工具(PACT)将术后风险降至最低:一项前瞻性观察性研究和成本效益分析的方案

Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis.

作者信息

Street Maryann, Phillips Nicole M, Kent Bridie, Colgan Stephen, Mohebbi Mohammadreza

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia Eastern Health-Deakin University Nursing & Midwifery Research Centre, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 1;5(6):e007200. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007200.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007200
PMID:26033942
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4458583/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

While the risk of adverse events following surgery has been identified, the impact of nursing care on early detection of these events is not well established. A systematic review of the evidence and an expert consensus study in post-anaesthetic care identified essential criteria for nursing assessment of patient readiness for discharge from the post-anaesthetic care unit (PACU). These criteria were included in a new nursing assessment tool, the Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT), and incorporated into the post-anaesthetic documentation at a large health service. The aim of this study is to test the clinical reliability of the PACT and evaluate whether the use of PACT will (1) enhance the recognition and response to patients at risk of deterioration in PACU; (2) improve documentation for handover from PACU nurse to ward nurse; (3) result in improved patient outcomes and (4) reduce healthcare costs.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A prospective, non-randomised, pre-implementation and post-implementation design comparing: (1) patients (n=750) who have surgery prior to the implementation of the PACT and (2) patients (n=750) who have surgery after PACT. The study will examine the use of the tool through the observation of patient care and nursing handover. Patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness will be determined from health service data and medical record audit. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the sample and compare the two patient groups (pre-intervention and post-intervention). Differences in patient outcomes between the two groups will be compared using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and regression analyses and reported as ORs with the corresponding 95% CIs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will test the clinical reliability and cost-effectiveness of the PACT. It is hypothesised that the PACT will enable nurses to recognise and respond to patients at risk of deterioration, improve handover to ward nurses, improve patient outcomes, and reduce healthcare costs.

摘要

引言

虽然手术术后不良事件的风险已被确认,但护理对这些事件早期发现的影响尚未明确。一项针对麻醉后护理的证据系统评价和专家共识研究确定了麻醉后护理单元(PACU)患者出院准备情况护理评估的基本标准。这些标准被纳入一种新的护理评估工具——麻醉后护理工具(PACT),并在一家大型医疗服务机构的麻醉后护理记录中得以应用。本研究的目的是测试PACT的临床可靠性,并评估使用PACT是否会:(1)加强对PACU中病情恶化风险患者的识别和应对;(2)改善从PACU护士到病房护士的交接记录;(3)带来更好的患者结局;(4)降低医疗成本。

方法与分析

采用前瞻性、非随机、实施前与实施后设计进行比较:(1)PACT实施前接受手术的患者(n = 750);(2)PACT实施后接受手术的患者(n = 750)。本研究将通过观察患者护理和护理交接来考察该工具的使用情况。患者结局和成本效益将根据医疗服务数据和病历审核来确定。描述性统计将用于描述样本并比较两组患者(干预前和干预后)。两组患者结局的差异将使用 Cochr an-Mantel-Haenszel检验和回归分析进行比较,并以比值比及相应的95%置信区间报告。

结论

本研究将测试PACT的临床可靠性和成本效益。假设PACT将使护士能够识别并应对病情恶化风险患者;改善向病房护士的交接;改善患者结局并降低医疗成本。