• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the PAtient-Centred Team (PACT) model: study protocol of a prospective matched control before-and-after study.以患者为中心的团队(PACT)模式的有效性和成本效益:一项前瞻性配对对照前后研究的研究方案
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Oct 23;15:133. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0133-x.
2
Person-centred, integrated and pro-active care for multi-morbid elderly with advanced care needs: a propensity score-matched controlled trial.以患者为中心、整合的、主动的多模式护理方案用于满足有高级医疗需求的多病共存老年患者:一项倾向评分匹配对照试验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 3;19(1):682. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4397-2.
3
Group cognitive-behavioural programme to reduce the impact of rheumatoid arthritis fatigue: the RAFT RCT with economic and qualitative evaluations.群组认知行为方案对减轻类风湿关节炎疲劳的影响:RAFT RCT 伴有经济和定性评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(57):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta23570.
4
A randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a dedicated health and social care professionals team in the emergency department on the quality, safety, clinical and cost-effectiveness of care for older adults: a study protocol.一项随机对照试验,旨在探索在急诊科中设立专门的医疗和社会保健专业人员团队对老年人护理的质量、安全性、临床效果和成本效益的影响:研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Oct 15;20(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3697-5.
5
Cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation of elderly frail or pre-frail patients prior to elective surgery (PRAEP-GO) versus usual care - Protocol for a health economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial.择期手术前老年虚弱或衰弱前期患者的预康复(PRAEP-GO)与常规护理的成本效益比较:一项随机对照试验的卫生经济学评价方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Mar 6;24(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04833-5.
6
The CareWell-primary care program: design of a cluster controlled trial and process evaluation of a complex intervention targeting community-dwelling frail elderly.关爱健康初级保健项目:一项以社区居住的虚弱老年人为目标的复杂干预措施的集群对照试验设计和过程评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Dec 5;13:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-115.
7
Patient-centred and professional-directed implementation strategies for diabetes guidelines: a cluster-randomized trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis.糖尿病指南以患者为中心和专业指导的实施策略:基于整群随机试验的成本效益分析
Diabet Med. 2006 Feb;23(2):164-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01751.x.
8
9
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a community-based model of care for older patients with complex needs: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial using a stepped wedge cluster design.针对有复杂需求的老年患者的社区照护模式的疗效和成本效益:一项采用阶梯式楔形整群设计的多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Dec 4;19(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3038-0.
10
Short-term Resource Utilization and Cost-Effectiveness of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Acute Hospital Care for Severely Frail Elderly Patients.综合老年评估在急性医院护理中对严重虚弱老年患者的短期资源利用和成本效益。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Oct;19(10):871-878.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of impact of person-centred interventions for serious physical illness in terms of outcomes and costs.一项关于以患者为中心的干预措施对严重躯体疾病的影响(从结果和成本方面考量)的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 13;12(7):e054386. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054386.
2
Person-centred, integrated and pro-active care for multi-morbid elderly with advanced care needs: a propensity score-matched controlled trial.以患者为中心、整合的、主动的多模式护理方案用于满足有高级医疗需求的多病共存老年患者:一项倾向评分匹配对照试验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 3;19(1):682. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4397-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions.为患有慢性或长期健康问题的成年人制定个性化护理计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 3;2015(3):CD010523. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010523.pub2.
2
Joint influence of Patient-Assessed Chronic Illness Care and patient activation on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes.患者评估的慢性病护理与患者自我管理能力对2型糖尿病血糖控制的联合影响
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Apr;27(2):117-24. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv001. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
3
No consistent association between processes-of-care and health-related quality of life among patients with diabetes: a missing link?在糖尿病患者中,护理流程与健康相关生活质量之间没有一致的关联:缺失的环节?
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2015 Jan 10;3(1):e000042. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2014-000042. eCollection 2015.
4
The impact of intensive multifactorial treatment on perceptions of chronic care among individuals with screen-detected diabetes: results from the ADDITION-Denmark trial.强化多因素治疗对筛查发现的糖尿病患者慢性护理认知的影响:丹麦ADDITION试验结果
Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Apr;69(4):466-73. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12570. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
5
Associations between medical home characteristics and support for patient activation in the safety net: understanding differences by race, ethnicity, and health status.安全网中医疗之家特征与患者激活支持之间的关联:按种族、族裔和健康状况理解差异。
Med Care. 2014 Nov;52(11 Suppl 4):S48-55. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000198.
6
Evaluating the structure of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) survey from the patient's perspective.从患者角度评估慢性病护理患者评估量表(PACIC)的结构。
Ann Behav Med. 2015 Feb;49(1):104-11. doi: 10.1007/s12160-014-9638-3.
7
Patient-centred interprofessional collaboration in primary care: challenges for clinical, educational and health services research. An EGPRN keynote paper.基层医疗中以患者为中心的跨专业协作:临床、教育与卫生服务研究面临的挑战。一篇欧洲全科医学研究网络(EGPRN)主题演讲论文。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2014 Dec;20(4):327-32. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2014.908462. Epub 2014 Jun 1.
8
Are multidisciplinary teams in secondary care cost-effective? A systematic review of the literature.多学科团队在二级保健中是否具有成本效益?文献系统评价。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2013 Apr 4;11(1):7. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-11-7.
9
Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.针对2型糖尿病成年患者的基于计算机的糖尿病自我管理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD008776. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008776.pub2.
10
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.一致性健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)声明。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2013 Mar 25;11(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-11-6.

以患者为中心的团队(PACT)模式的有效性和成本效益:一项前瞻性配对对照前后研究的研究方案

The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the PAtient-Centred Team (PACT) model: study protocol of a prospective matched control before-and-after study.

作者信息

Bergmo Trine S, Berntsen Gro K, Dalbakk Monika, Rumpsfeld Markus

机构信息

Norwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine, University Hospital of North Norway, 9038, Tromsø, Norway.

Division of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2015 Oct 23;15:133. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0133-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-015-0133-x
PMID:26499256
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4619094/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study protocol describes the evaluation of a comprehensive integrated care model implemented at two hospital sites at the University Hospital of North Norway (UNN). The PAtient Centred Team (PACT) model includes proactive, patient-centred interdisciplinary teams that aim to improve the continuum and quality of care of frail elderly patients and reduce health care costs. The main objectives of the evaluation are to analyse the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of using patient-centred teams as part of routine service provision for this patient group. The evaluation will analyse the effect on patient health and functional status, patient experiences and hospital utilisation, and it will conduct an economic evaluation. This paper describes the PACT model and the rationale for and design of the planned effectiveness and cost-effectiveness study.

METHODS/DESIGN: This is a prospective, non-randomised matched control before-and-after intervention study. Patients in the intervention group will be recruited from the hospital sites that have implemented the PACT model. The controls will be recruited from two hospitals without the model. The control patients and the index patients will be matched according to sex, age and number of long-term conditions. The study aims to include 600 patients in each group, which will provide sufficient power to detect a clinical change in the primary outcome. The primary outcome is the physical dimension of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Secondary outcomes are the Patient Generated Index (PGI), the Patient Activation Measure (PAM), the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC), hospitalisation and length of stay. The cost-effectiveness study takes a health provider perspective and calculates the cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. The data will be collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months. The data will be analysed using techniques and models that recognise the lack of randomisation and the correlation of cost and effect data.

DISCUSSION

The study results will provide knowledge about whether the integrated care model implemented at UNN improves the quality of care for the frail elderly with multiple conditions. The study will establish whether the PAC. T model improves health and functional status and is cost effective compared to the usual care for this patient group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02541474.

摘要

背景

本研究方案描述了对挪威北部大学医院(UNN)两个院区实施的综合整合照护模式的评估。以患者为中心的团队(PACT)模式包括积极主动、以患者为中心的跨学科团队,旨在改善体弱老年患者的照护连续性和质量,并降低医疗保健成本。评估的主要目标是分析将以患者为中心的团队作为该患者群体常规服务一部分的有效性和成本效益。该评估将分析对患者健康和功能状态、患者体验及医院利用情况的影响,并将进行经济评估。本文描述了PACT模式以及计划中的有效性和成本效益研究的基本原理与设计。

方法/设计:这是一项前瞻性、非随机配对对照干预前后研究。干预组患者将从已实施PACT模式的院区招募。对照组将从两所未采用该模式的医院招募。对照患者和索引患者将根据性别、年龄和长期病症数量进行匹配。该研究旨在每组纳入600名患者,这将为检测主要结局的临床变化提供足够的效力。主要结局是简短健康调查问卷(SF - 36)的身体维度。次要结局包括患者生成指数(PGI)、患者激活度量表(PAM)、慢性病照护患者评估(PACIC)、住院情况和住院时长。成本效益研究从医疗服务提供者的角度出发,计算每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本。数据将在基线、6个月和12个月时收集。将使用认识到缺乏随机化以及成本和效果数据相关性的技术和模型对数据进行分析。

讨论

研究结果将提供有关UNN实施的整合照护模式是否改善了患有多种病症的体弱老年人的照护质量的知识。该研究将确定PACT模式是否改善了健康和功能状态,以及与该患者群体的常规照护相比是否具有成本效益。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02541474。