• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

协作式病例管理模式能否降低高危患者的医院再入院率?

Do collaborative case management models decrease hospital readmission rates among high-risk patients?

作者信息

Bisiani Marisa A, Jurgens Corinne Y

机构信息

Marisa A. Bisiani, DNP, RN, ANP-BC, has been in the field nursing for more than 20 years. As a young nurse who began her career as a nurse's aide, she pursued education as a licensed practical nurse and then an associate prepared registered nurse to obtaining a bachelor of science. She received her master of science from Stony Brook, leading her to become a licensed ANCC Board Certified Adult Nurse Practitioner. She recently graduated from Stony Brook Universities Doctorate of Nursing Practice (DNP) program. She works as a nurse executive and she has directed many departments such as care management, allied health professionals, employee health services, and hemodialysis. Her specialty is inclusive of focusing on care transitions, as we move one patient to each level of care. She is exceptionally interested in the work of preventable readmissions and population health. Corrine Y. Jurgens, PhD, RN, ANP-BC, FAHA, is a nurse scientist. Her program of research focuses on patients with heart failure and self-care. In particular, she studies symptom perception, recognition, and response in this population. Her prior work indicates patients lack a context for determining whether their symptoms are heart-related or associated with less threatening illnesses. She conducted a randomized trial testing an intervention based on my prior studies and theory that provides patients with a way to monitor and interpret their symptoms in a meaningful way. Other interests include investigating a phenotype for mild cognitive impairment in patients with heart failure, exploring self-care interventions for frail elders, implementing guidelines for heart failure management in skilled nursing facilities, and examining factors related to symptom blunting in this population.

出版信息

Prof Case Manag. 2015 Jul-Aug;20(4):188-96. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000098.

DOI:10.1097/NCM.0000000000000098
PMID:26035261
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Case management provides a process and structure in health care systems that influence and control quality of care while reducing costs. A quality indicator of widespread concern is 30-day readmission of patients. There is significant initiative to drive down hospital readmission rates through development and/or redesign of case management models.

PURPOSE

To examine the relationship of a collaborative case management model on hospital readmission rates among patients aged 65 years and older.

METHODOLOGY AND SAMPLE

A retrospective chart review of patients discharged alive (n = 978) was conducted to evaluate and compare 2 care management models on hospital readmission rates. Demographic data, diagnosis, insurance carrier, admission source, discharge disposition, and incidence of readmission were collected using a structured data extraction tool. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of readmission within 30 days of hospital discharge.

RESULTS

The sample was elderly (mean age = 79.5 years), White (88.8%), and primarily female (60%). Mean length of stay between pre- and postmodel groups was not statistically different (p = .2). The model contained 6 independent variables (gender, payer, admission source, discharge disposition, diagnosis, and length of stay) and none were statistically significant, χ2 (1, n = 978) = 1.97, p = .58. The analysis indicates that group characteristics did not distinguish who would get readmitted on the basis of independent variables measured.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE

Age, gender, admit source, diagnosis, length of stay, and discharge disposition are not significant predictors of readmissions. Hospital case management programs may want to consider structuring processes to support patient adherence. Additional research is needed in this area.

摘要

背景

病例管理在医疗保健系统中提供了一个流程和架构,既能影响和控制医疗质量,又能降低成本。一个广受关注的质量指标是患者30天再入院率。通过开发和/或重新设计病例管理模式,人们为降低医院再入院率付出了巨大努力。

目的

研究协作式病例管理模式与65岁及以上患者医院再入院率之间的关系。

方法与样本

对978例存活出院患者进行回顾性病历审查,以评估和比较两种护理管理模式的医院再入院率。使用结构化数据提取工具收集人口统计学数据、诊断结果、保险公司、入院来源、出院处置情况和再入院发生率。采用逻辑回归分析确定出院后30天内再入院的预测因素。

结果

样本为老年人(平均年龄 = 79.5岁),白人(88.8%),且以女性为主(60%)。模型前组和模型后组的平均住院时间无统计学差异(p = 0.2)。该模型包含6个自变量(性别、付款人、入院来源、出院处置情况、诊断结果和住院时间),且均无统计学意义,χ2(1,n = 978)= 1.97,p = 0.58。分析表明组间特征并不能根据所测量的自变量区分谁会再次入院。

对病例管理实践的启示

年龄、性别、入院来源、诊断结果、住院时间和出院处置情况并非再入院的显著预测因素。医院病例管理项目可能需要考虑构建相关流程以支持患者坚持治疗。该领域还需要更多研究。

相似文献

1
Do collaborative case management models decrease hospital readmission rates among high-risk patients?协作式病例管理模式能否降低高危患者的医院再入院率?
Prof Case Manag. 2015 Jul-Aug;20(4):188-96. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000098.
2
Predicting Risk Factors for 30-Day Readmissions Following Discharge From Post-Acute Care.预测急性后期护理出院后30天再入院的风险因素。
Prof Case Manag. 2018 May/Jun;23(3):139-146. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000261.
3
Preventing readmissions through comprehensive discharge planning.通过全面的出院计划预防再入院。
Prof Case Manag. 2013 Mar-Apr;18(2):56-63; quiz 64-5. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0b013e31827de1ce.
4
Risk factors for readmission of orthopaedic surgical patients.骨科手术患者再入院的风险因素。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jun 5;95(11):1012-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01569.
5
Intensive care unit readmissions in U.S. hospitals: patient characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes.美国医院重症监护病房再入院:患者特征、风险因素和结果。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822d751e.
6
Risk Factor Analysis of Hospital Readmissions at St. Petersburg General Hospital.圣彼得堡总医院再入院的风险因素分析。
HCA Healthc J Med. 2023 Feb 28;4(1):35-42. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1415. eCollection 2023.
7
Trauma patient readmissions: Why do they come back for more?创伤患者再入院:他们为何再次入院?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Nov;79(5):717-24; discussion 724-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000844.
8
Incidence and predictors of 30-day readmission for patients discharged home after craniotomy for malignant supratentorial tumors in California (1995-2010).加利福尼亚州幕上恶性肿瘤患者开颅术后出院后 30 天再入院的发生率和预测因素(1995-2010 年)。
J Neurosurg. 2014 May;120(5):1201-11. doi: 10.3171/2014.1.JNS131264. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
9
Association of partner status and disposition with rehospitalization in heart failure patients.配偶状况和处置方式与心力衰竭患者再入院的关系。
Am J Crit Care. 2012 May;21(3):e65-73. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2012382.
10
Hospital readmission among older adults with congestive heart failure.老年充血性心力衰竭患者的医院再入院情况。
Aust Health Rev. 2013 Jun;37(3):362-8. doi: 10.1071/AH12042.

引用本文的文献

1
An investigation of quality improvement initiatives in decreasing the rate of avoidable 30-day, skilled nursing facility-to-hospital readmissions: a systematic review.降低可避免的30天内从专业护理机构到医院再入院率的质量改进举措调查:一项系统综述
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Jan 25;12:213-222. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S123362. eCollection 2017.
2
Prevalence of Heart Failure and Adherence to Process Indicators: Which Socio-Demographic Determinants are Involved?心力衰竭的患病率及对流程指标的依从性:涉及哪些社会人口学决定因素?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Feb 19;13(2):238. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13020238.