Suppr超能文献

无症状糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影结果的比较。

Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiographic Findings in Asymptomatic Subjects With Versus Without Diabetes Mellitus.

作者信息

Park Gyung-Min, Lee Jae-Hwan, Lee Seung-Whan, Yun Sung-Cheol, Kim Young-Hak, Cho Young-Rak, Gil Eun Ha, Kim Tae-Seok, Kim Chan Joon, Cho Jung Sun, Park Mahn-Won, Her Sung Ho, Yang Dong Hyun, Kang Joon-Won, Lim Tae-Hwan, Koh Eun Hee, Lee Woo Je, Kim Min-Seon, Lee Ki-Up, Kim Hong-Kyu, Choe Jaewon, Park Joong-Yeol

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea.

Department of Cardiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2015 Aug 1;116(3):372-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.04.046. Epub 2015 May 8.

Abstract

There are limited data on the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on the risk of subclinical atherosclerosis. Therefore, we sought to investigate the impact of DM on the risk of subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic subjects. We analyzed 2,034 propensity score-matched asymptomatic subjects who underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography (mean age 55.9 ± 8.2 years; men 1,725 [84.8%]). Coronary artery calcium score, degree and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD), and clinical outcomes were assessed. High-risk CAD was defined as at least 2-vessel coronary disease with proximal left anterior descending artery involvement, 3-vessel disease, or left main disease. Compared with subjects without DM, those matched with DM had higher coronary artery calcium score (89.9 ± 240.4 vs 62.8 ± 179.5, p = 0.004) and more significant CAD (≥50% diameter stenosis, 15.2% vs 10.2%, p = 0.001), largely in the form of 1-vessel disease (10.8% vs 7.3%, p = 0.007). However, there were no significant differences between matched pairs in significant CAD in the left main or proximal left anterior descending artery (5.3% vs 3.8%, p = 0.138), multivessel disease (4.4% vs 2.9%, p = 0.101), and high-risk CAD (4.3% vs 2.7%, p = 0.058). During the follow-up period (median 21.8, interquartile range 15.2 to 33.4 months), there was no significant difference in the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, and coronary revascularization between 2 groups (hazard ratio 1.438, 95% confidence interval 0.844 to 2.449, p = 0.181). In asymptomatic subjects, those matched with DM have more subclinical atherosclerosis, mainly confined to non-high-risk CAD, than those matched without DM, and there are no differences in high-risk CAD and clinical outcomes.

摘要

关于糖尿病(DM)对亚临床动脉粥样硬化风险的影响,现有数据有限。因此,我们试图研究DM对无症状受试者亚临床动脉粥样硬化风险的影响。我们分析了2034例接受冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影的倾向评分匹配无症状受试者(平均年龄55.9±8.2岁;男性1725例[84.8%])。评估了冠状动脉钙化评分、冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的程度和范围以及临床结局。高危CAD定义为至少两支血管冠状动脉疾病伴左前降支近端受累、三支血管疾病或左主干疾病。与无DM的受试者相比,匹配DM的受试者冠状动脉钙化评分更高(89.9±240.4 vs 62.8±179.5,p = 0.004),CAD更显著(直径狭窄≥50%,15.2% vs 10.2%,p = 0.001),主要为单支血管疾病(10.8% vs 7.3%,p = 0.007)。然而,匹配对之间在左主干或左前降支近端的显著CAD(5.3% vs 3.8%,p = 0.138)、多支血管疾病(4.4% vs 2.9%,p = 0.101)和高危CAD(4.3% vs 2.7%,p = 0.058)方面无显著差异。在随访期(中位数21.8,四分位间距15.2至33.4个月),两组之间在全因死亡、心肌梗死、急性冠状动脉综合征和冠状动脉血运重建的综合结局方面无显著差异(风险比1.438,95%置信区间0.844至2.449,p = 0.181)。在无症状受试者中,与无DM匹配的受试者相比,与DM匹配的受试者有更多亚临床动脉粥样硬化,主要局限于非高危CAD,且在高危CAD和临床结局方面无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验