Plasmakinetic Vapor Enucleation of the Prostate with Button Electrode versus Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Enlargement >90 ml: Perioperative and 3-Month Follow-Up Results of a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate plasmakinetic vapor enucleation of the prostate (PVEP) with button electrode and plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) in patients with urinary symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) >90 ml.

METHODS

A total of 112 patients with symptomatic BPE were randomly assigned to either PKRP or PVEP prospectively from August 2012 to May 2014 in our department. Perioperative and postoperative data were investigated during a 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS

PVEP was significantly superior to PKRP in terms of operation time (63.9 ± 7.7 vs. 78.1 ± 13.6 min, p < 0.001), hemoglobin loss (1.18 ± 0.30 vs. 1.63 ± 0.38 g/dl, p < 0.001), serum sodium decrease (2.9 ± 0.7 vs. 4.3 ± 0.8 mmol/l, p < 0.001), catheterization duration (49.3 ± 12.2 vs. 78.1 ± 14.8 h, p < 0.001) and hospital stay (100.2 ± 28.3 vs. 116.0 ± 29.2 h, p = 0.004). There were no statistical differences in blood transfusion between the two groups. In addition, there were no statistical differences in maximum urinary flow rate, International Prostate Symptom Score, postvoid residual urine volume, quality-of-life score, transient incontinence, and urethral stricture at 3 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

PVEP with button electrode is an equally effective technique for treatment of large BPE with PKRP, with more safety and faster recovery. It may become the superior alternative to PKRP for patients with large BPE.