Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jun 9;65(22):2363-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.575.
Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with valve dysfunction, ascending aortic aneurysm and dissection. Management of the ascending aorta at the time of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in these patients is controversial and has been extrapolated from experience with Marfan syndrome, despite the absence of comparative long-term outcome data.
This study sought to assess whether the natural history of thoracic aortopathy after AVR in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease is substantially different from that seen in patients with Marfan syndrome.
In this retrospective comparison, outcomes of 13,205 adults (2,079 with bicuspid aortic valves, 73 with Marfan syndrome, and 11,053 control patients with acquired aortic valve disease) who underwent primary AVR without replacement of the ascending aorta in New York State between 1995 and 2010 were compared. The median follow-up time was 6.6 years.
The long-term incidence of thoracic aortic dissection was significantly higher in patients with Marfan syndrome (5.5 ± 2.7%) compared with those with bicuspid valves (0.55 ± 0.21%) and control group patients (0.41 ± 0.08%, p < 0.001). Thoracic aortic aneurysms were significantly more likely to be diagnosed in late follow-up in patients with Marfan syndrome (10.8 ± 4.4%) compared with those with bicuspid valves (4.8 ± 0.8%) and control group patients (1.4 ± 0.2%) (p < 0.001). Patients with Marfan syndrome were significantly more likely to undergo thoracic aortic surgery in late follow-up (10.4 ± 4.3%) compared with those with bicuspid valves (2.5 ± 0.6%) and control group patients (0.50 ± 0.09%) (p < 0.001).
The much higher long-term rates of aortic complications after AVR observed in patients with Marfan syndrome compared with those with bicuspid aortic valves confirm that operative management of patients with bicuspid aortic valves should not be extrapolated from Marfan syndrome and support discrete treatment algorithms for these different clinical entities.
二叶式主动脉瓣与瓣功能障碍、升主动脉瘤和夹层有关。在这些患者中,主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)时升主动脉的处理存在争议,并且是从马凡综合征的经验中推断出来的,尽管缺乏比较长期的结果数据。
本研究旨在评估二叶式主动脉瓣疾病患者在 AVR 后胸主动脉病的自然史是否与马凡综合征患者有显著不同。
在这项回顾性比较中,比较了 13205 名成年人(2079 名患有二叶式主动脉瓣,73 名患有马凡综合征,11053 名患有获得性主动脉瓣疾病的对照患者)在 1995 年至 2010 年期间在纽约州接受了无升主动脉置换的原发性 AVR 的结果。中位随访时间为 6.6 年。
马凡综合征患者的胸主动脉夹层长期发生率明显高于二叶式瓣患者(5.5 ± 2.7%)和对照组患者(0.41 ± 0.08%,p<0.001)。马凡综合征患者在晚期随访中更有可能被诊断出胸主动脉瘤(10.8 ± 4.4%),而二叶式瓣患者(4.8 ± 0.8%)和对照组患者(1.4 ± 0.2%)(p<0.001)。马凡综合征患者在晚期随访中更有可能接受胸主动脉手术(10.4 ± 4.3%),而二叶式瓣患者(2.5 ± 0.6%)和对照组患者(0.50 ± 0.09%)(p<0.001)。
与二叶式主动脉瓣患者相比,马凡综合征患者在 AVR 后长期主动脉并发症发生率更高,这证实了对二叶式主动脉瓣患者的手术治疗不应从马凡综合征推断出来,并支持针对这些不同临床实体的离散治疗算法。