Nöstlinger Christiana, Jasna Loos, Sabrina Bakeera-Kitaka, Obong'o Christopher, Eric Wobudeya, Buvé Anne
Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM), Nationalestraat 155, Antwerp B-2000, Belgium ITM HIV/AIDS Center, Nationalestraat 155, Antwerp B-2000, Belgium
Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM), Nationalestraat 155, Antwerp B-2000, Belgium ITM HIV/AIDS Center, Nationalestraat 155, Antwerp B-2000, Belgium.
Health Promot Int. 2016 Sep;31(3):653-64. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav044. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
There is an urgent need to develop positive prevention interventions for adolescents living with HIV in high endemic regions. Adapting existing evidence-based interventions for resource-constrained settings is effective when the intervention's theoretical core elements are preserved while achieving cultural relevance. We describe the process of adapting a primary prevention to a secondary/positive prevention programme for adolescents living with HIV in Kenya and Uganda. The systematic adaptation was guided by the Centers for Diseases Control's map for the adaptation process, describing an iterative process. The procedure included: assessing the target positive prevention group's needs (safer sex; fertility-related issues), identifying the potential interventions through a literature review, conducting qualitative adaptation research to identify areas for adaptation by ensuring cultural relevance (revising the intervention logic by adding topics such as adherence; HIV-related stigma; HIV-disclosure; safer sex), pilot-testing the adapted programme and conducting a process evaluation of its first implementation. Areas added onto the original intervention's logic framework, based on social cognitive theory, the theories of reasoned action and planned behaviour were information and skills building on sexual relationships and protection behaviour, prevention of vertical HIV transmission, contraception, HIV-disclosure, HIV-related stigma, HIV-treatment and adherence. The process evaluation using mixed methods showed that we delivered a feasible and acceptable intervention for HIV-positive adolescents aged 13-17 years. The systematic approach adopted facilitated the development of a contextualized and developmentally appropriate (i.e. age-specific) intervention for adolescents living with HIV.
在艾滋病高发地区,迫切需要为感染艾滋病毒的青少年制定积极的预防干预措施。在保留干预措施理论核心要素并实现文化相关性的同时,将现有的循证干预措施适用于资源有限的环境是有效的。我们描述了将一项初级预防措施改编为针对肯尼亚和乌干达感染艾滋病毒青少年的二级/积极预防计划的过程。系统改编以疾病控制中心的改编过程地图为指导,该地图描述了一个迭代过程。该程序包括:评估目标积极预防群体的需求(安全性行为;与生育相关的问题),通过文献综述确定潜在的干预措施,进行定性改编研究以通过确保文化相关性来确定改编领域(通过添加诸如依从性、与艾滋病毒相关的耻辱感、艾滋病毒披露、安全性行为等主题来修订干预逻辑),对改编后的计划进行试点测试并对其首次实施进行过程评估。基于社会认知理论、理性行动理论和计划行为理论,在原始干预措施的逻辑框架上增加的领域包括性健康关系和保护行为的信息与技能培养、预防艾滋病毒垂直传播、避孕、艾滋病毒披露、与艾滋病毒相关的耻辱感、艾滋病毒治疗和依从性。采用混合方法进行的过程评估表明,我们为13至17岁的艾滋病毒阳性青少年提供了一项可行且可接受的干预措施。所采用的系统方法促进了为感染艾滋病毒的青少年制定因地制宜且适合其发展阶段(即针对特定年龄)的干预措施。