Ojwang' V O, Penner J, Blat C, Agot K, Bukusi E A, Cohen C R
a Family AIDS Care & Education Services (FACES) , Centre for Microbiology Research (CMR), Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) , Nairobi , Kenya.
b Department of Family Practice , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , Canada.
AIDS Care. 2016;28(4):500-7. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2015.1110234. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
Youth are particularly vulnerable to acquiring HIV, yet reaching them with HIV prevention interventions and engaging and retaining those infected in care and treatment remains a challenge. We sought to determine the incidence rate of loss to follow-up (LTFU) and explore socio-demographic and clinical characteristics associated with LTFU among HIV-positive youth aged 15-21 years accessing outpatient care and treatment clinics in Kisumu, Kenya. Between July 2007 and September 2010, youth were enrolled into two different HIV care and treatment clinics, one youth specific and the other family oriented. An individual was defined as LTFU when absent from the HIV treatment clinic for ≥ 4 months regardless of their antiretroviral treatment status. The incidence rate of LTFU was calculated and Cox regression analysis used to identify factors associated with LTFU. A total of 924 youth (79% female) were enrolled, with a median age of 20 years (IQR 18-21). Over half, (529 (57%)), were documented as LTFU, of whom 139 (26%) were LTFU immediately after enrolment. The overall incidence rate of LTFU was 52.9 per 100 person-years (p-y). Factors associated with LTFU were pregnancy during the study period (crude HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.89); CD4 cell count >350 (adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) 0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.90); not being on antiretroviral therapy (AHR 4.0, 95% CI 2.70-5.88); and non-disclosure of HIV infection status (AHR 1.43, 95% CI 1.10-1.89). The clinic of enrolment, age, marital status, employment status, WHO clinical disease stage and education level were not associated with LTFU. Interventions to identify and enrol youth into care earlier, support disclosure, and initiate ART earlier may improve retention of youth and need further investigation. Further research is also needed to explore the reasons for LTFU from care among HIV-infected youth and the true outcomes of these patients.
年轻人特别容易感染艾滋病毒,但对他们实施艾滋病毒预防干预措施以及让那些感染者接受并持续接受护理和治疗仍然是一项挑战。我们试图确定失访(LTFU)的发生率,并探讨在肯尼亚基苏木的门诊护理和治疗诊所接受治疗的15至21岁艾滋病毒呈阳性的年轻人中与失访相关的社会人口学和临床特征。在2007年7月至2010年9月期间,年轻人被纳入两家不同的艾滋病毒护理和治疗诊所,一家是专门针对年轻人的,另一家是以家庭为导向的。如果一个人在艾滋病毒治疗诊所连续缺席≥4个月,无论其抗逆转录病毒治疗状态如何,都被定义为失访。计算失访的发生率,并使用Cox回归分析来确定与失访相关的因素。总共招募了924名年轻人(79%为女性),中位年龄为20岁(四分位间距18 - 21岁)。超过一半(529人(57%))被记录为失访,其中139人(26%)在入组后立即失访。失访的总体发生率为每100人年5