• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Quantitative aspects of the estimation of evolutionary trees.

作者信息

Friday A

机构信息

University Museum of Zoology, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Folia Primatol (Basel). 1989;53(1-4):221-34. doi: 10.1159/000156418.

DOI:10.1159/000156418
PMID:2606397
Abstract

Various approaches to the estimation of evolutionary trees are reviewed, with emphasis on recent developments. It is argued that no approach is 'model-free', that is, without some assumptions about the processes of evolutionary change. A statistical approach provides a general framework and it is accepted that cladistic methodology represents a special case within this framework. The idea of evolutionary convergence is examined in the light of recent discussion of the existence of convergence in molecular evolution. It is concluded that attempts to estimate evolutionary trees are justifiable at least on the grounds that, despite present shortcomings, they are the most appropriate way to analyse comparative data. There are good prospects for further progress.

摘要

相似文献

1
Quantitative aspects of the estimation of evolutionary trees.
Folia Primatol (Basel). 1989;53(1-4):221-34. doi: 10.1159/000156418.
2
[Foundations of the new phylogenetics].[新系统发育学的基础]
Zh Obshch Biol. 2004 Jul-Aug;65(4):334-66.
3
Quantitative developmental data in a phylogenetic framework.系统发育框架下的定量发育数据。
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2014 Dec;322(8):558-66. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.22588. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
4
On joint subtree distributions under two evolutionary models.关于两种进化模型下的联合子树分布
Theor Popul Biol. 2016 Apr;108:13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
5
Taxonomy and Phylogeny Can Yield Comparable Results in Comparative Paleontological Analyses.在比较古生物学分析中,分类学和系统发育学可产生可比的结果。
Syst Biol. 2015 Jul;64(4):608-20. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syv015. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
6
The importance of using realistic evolutionary models for retrodicting proteomes.使用现实进化模型回溯蛋白质组的重要性。
Biochimie. 2014 Apr;99:129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
7
Testing Convergence Versus History: Convergence Dominates Phenotypic Evolution for over 150 Million Years in Frogs.测试趋同与历史:在超过 1.5 亿年的时间里,青蛙的表型进化中趋同占主导地位。
Syst Biol. 2016 Jan;65(1):146-60. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syv073. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
8
Evolutionary models of phylogenetic trees.系统发育树的进化模型。
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jul 7;270(1522):1425-31. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2374.
9
No substitute for real data: A cautionary note on the use of phylogenies from birth-death polytomy resolvers for downstream comparative analyses.真实数据无可替代:关于将出生-死亡多歧解析器的系统发育树用于下游比较分析的警示说明。
Evolution. 2015 Dec;69(12):3207-16. doi: 10.1111/evo.12817.
10
Estimating the reliability of evolutionary trees.估计进化树的可靠性。
Mol Biol Evol. 1986 Sep;3(5):403-17. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040407.