Aggleton Peter, Parker Richard
Peter Aggleton is with the Centre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Australia, Sydney. Richard Parker is with the Center for the Study of Culture, Politics and Health, Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, and the Institute of Social Medicine, Rio de Janeiro State University, and the Brazilian Interdisciplinary AIDS Association (ABIA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Am J Public Health. 2015 Aug;105(8):1552-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302614. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
As the world enjoys the promise of biomedical advances against HIV, numerous challenges remain. Some of these are connected to politics, others are connected to resource constraints. Other barriers are linked to the need to ensure that the concepts used to think about HIV remain current. Terms such as "MSM" (men who have sex with men) and "community" require critical interrogation at a moment when their political origins seem forgotten. Likewise, struggles between groups most affected by HIV and scientists and policymakers (an enduring feature of the epidemic) remain a key aspect of the response. The dangers of co-option and distraction remain real. In this context, it is vital to promote community ownership, political commitment, solidarity, and respect for differences, not as competing values, but as part of the ultimate solution to HIV.
当世界因生物医学在对抗艾滋病毒方面取得进展而充满希望时,众多挑战依然存在。其中一些与政治有关,另一些与资源限制有关。其他障碍则与确保用于思考艾滋病毒的概念与时俱进的需求有关。在“男男性行为者”(MSM)和“社区”等术语的政治起源似乎被遗忘之际,这些术语需要进行批判性审视。同样,受艾滋病毒影响最严重的群体与科学家及政策制定者之间的斗争(这是该流行病的一个长期特征)仍是应对措施的一个关键方面。被拉拢和分散注意力的危险依然存在。在这种背景下,至关重要的是促进社区自主、政治承诺、团结以及对差异的尊重,它们并非相互竞争的价值观,而是应对艾滋病毒最终解决方案的一部分。