Kippax Susan
National Centre in HIV Social Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2008 Jul;3(4):489-94. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e32830136a0.
As understanding and integrating the structural and biomedical determinants of HIV infection is essential for the success of prevention efforts, there is a need for biomedical and social scientists to work together.
A review of the biomedical research literature indicates that the two major routes of HIV transmission, sexual and injection drug use behaviours, are primarily understood as biological. A review of the social science literature, however, indicates that such a positioning provides a very weak basis for prevention, as these behaviours or practices are socially produced; that is, they are patterned by socio-cultural, economic and political forces as well as by biological factors. This paper compares successful with unsuccessful prevention interventions/programmes highlighting the central importance of the structural determinants of risk. For HIV-prevention programmes to be effective, the focus must shift from behaviour, for example, from vaginal intercourse, to the cultural forms in which it is enacted; that is, to marriage, concurrent partnering, sex work, and so forth.
This paper concludes that multidisciplinary teams provide a good starting place for the development of effective prevention programmes.
由于理解和整合艾滋病毒感染的结构及生物医学决定因素对预防工作的成功至关重要,因此生物医学科学家和社会科学家需要携手合作。
对生物医学研究文献的综述表明,艾滋病毒传播的两大主要途径,即性行为和注射吸毒行为,主要被理解为生物学现象。然而,对社会科学文献的综述表明,这种定位为预防提供的基础非常薄弱,因为这些行为或做法是社会建构的;也就是说,它们受到社会文化、经济和政治力量以及生物学因素的影响。本文将成功与失败的预防干预措施/项目进行了比较,突出了风险结构决定因素的核心重要性。为使艾滋病毒预防项目有效,重点必须从行为,例如从阴道性交,转向其表现形式的文化形态;也就是说,转向婚姻、同时拥有多个性伴侣、性工作等。
本文得出结论,多学科团队为制定有效的预防项目提供了一个良好的起点。