Suppr超能文献

采用红外线热像仪(IRM)、高铜汞合金和EBA水门汀作为倒充填材料时的体外渗漏情况。

Leakage in vitro with IRM, high copper amalgam, and EBA cement as retrofilling materials.

作者信息

Bondra D L, Hartwell G R, MacPherson M G, Portell F R

出版信息

J Endod. 1989 Apr;15(4):157-60. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80253-5.

Abstract

An in vitro dye leakage study was performed to compare the sealing ability of high copper amalgam with Copalite, IRM, and EBA cement when used as retrofilling materials. Fifty-one extracted anterior teeth were instrumented and then obturated with gutta-percha. The apical 3 mm of the roots were resected and 2-mm deep apical preparations were made. The roots were then randomly placed into three groups and retrofilled with one of the experimental materials. After 72 h in India ink, the teeth were cleared and evaluated for leakage with a stereomicroscope. No leakage was evident in the three teeth used as negative controls and complete leakage was noted in the three positive control teeth. Statistical analysis showed that IRM and EBA cement had significantly less leakage than amalgam with Copalite. The difference between the EBA cement and IRM was not significant.

摘要

进行了一项体外染料渗漏研究,以比较高铜汞合金与考派利特、IRM和EBA水门汀作为倒充填材料时的封闭能力。选取51颗拔除的前牙进行根管预备,然后用牙胶尖充填。切除牙根根尖3mm,并制备2mm深的根尖洞形。然后将牙根随机分为三组,用其中一种实验材料进行倒充填。在印度墨水中浸泡72小时后,清理牙齿并用体视显微镜评估渗漏情况。用作阴性对照的三颗牙齿未发现渗漏,三颗阳性对照牙齿出现完全渗漏。统计分析表明,IRM和EBA水门汀的渗漏明显少于含考派利特的汞合金。EBA水门汀和IRM之间的差异不显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验