Ringhof Steffen, Hellmann Daniel, Meier Florian, Etz Eike, Schindler Hans J, Stein Thorsten
BioMotion Center, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Karlsruhe, Germany.
Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, University of Heidelberg Heidelberg, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 2;6:750. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00750. eCollection 2015.
Human motor control is based on complex sensorimotor processes. Recent research has shown that neuromuscular activity of the craniomandibular system (CMS) might affect human motor control. In particular, improvements in postural stability and muscle strength have been observed as a result of voluntary jaw clenching. Potential benefits of jaw aligning appliances on muscle strength and golf performance have also been described. These reports are highly contradictory, however, and the oral motor task performed is often unclear. The purpose of our study was, therefore, to investigate the effect of submaximum biting on golf performance via shot precision and shot length over three different distances. Participants were 14 male professional golfers - seven with sleep bruxism and seven without - randomly performing golf shots over 60m, 160m, or driving distance while either biting on an oral splint or biting on their teeth; habitual jaw position served as the control condition. Statistical analysis revealed that oral motor activity did not systematically affect golf performance in respect of shot precision or shot length for 60m, 160 m, or driving distance. These findings were reinforced by impact variables such as club head speed and ball speed, which were also not indicative of significant effects. The results thus showed that the strength improvements and stabilizing effects described previously are, apparently, not transferable to such coordination-demanding sports as golf. This could be due to the divergent motor demands associated with postural control and muscle strength on the one hand and the complex coordination of a golf swing on the other. Interestingly, subjects without sleep bruxism performed significantly better at the short distance (60 m) than those with bruxism. Because of the multifactorial etiology of parafunctional CMS activity, conclusions about the need for dental treatment to improve sports performance are, however, completely unwarranted.
人类运动控制基于复杂的感觉运动过程。最近的研究表明,颅下颌系统(CMS)的神经肌肉活动可能会影响人类运动控制。特别是,通过自愿咬紧牙关,观察到姿势稳定性和肌肉力量有所改善。也有关于颌骨矫正器具对肌肉力量和高尔夫球表现潜在益处的描述。然而,这些报告存在高度矛盾,并且所执行的口腔运动任务通常不明确。因此,我们研究的目的是通过在三个不同距离上的击球精度和击球长度来研究次最大咬合力对高尔夫球表现的影响。参与者为14名男性职业高尔夫球手——7名患有睡眠磨牙症,7名没有——在咬住口腔夹板或咬牙的同时,随机在60米、160米或击球距离上进行高尔夫击球;习惯性颌位作为对照条件。统计分析表明,对于60米、160米或击球距离,口腔运动活动在击球精度或击球长度方面并未系统地影响高尔夫球表现。这些发现通过诸如杆头速度和球速等撞击变量得到了加强,这些变量也未显示出显著影响。结果表明,先前描述的力量改善和稳定效果显然无法转移到像高尔夫这样对协调性要求较高的运动中。这可能一方面是由于与姿势控制和肌肉力量相关的不同运动需求,另一方面是由于高尔夫挥杆的复杂协调性。有趣的是,没有睡眠磨牙症的受试者在短距离(60米)的表现明显优于患有磨牙症的受试者。然而,由于功能性CMS活动的多因素病因,关于需要牙科治疗来提高运动表现的结论是完全没有根据的。