• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Detecting underreporters of abortions and miscarriages in the national study of family growth, 2011-2015.检测 2011-2015 年全国家庭增长研究中流产和堕胎漏报情况。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 3;17(8):e0271288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271288. eCollection 2022.
2
Discrepant abortion reporting by interview methodology among men from the United States National Survey of Family Growth (2015-2017).美国国家家庭增长调查(2015-2017 年)中男性采用访谈方法报告的堕胎数据存在差异。
Contraception. 2022 Aug;112:111-115. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
3
Effect of ACASI on Reporting of Abortion and Other Pregnancy Outcomes in the US National Survey of Family Growth.ACASI 对美国国家家庭增长调查中堕胎和其他妊娠结局报告的影响。
Stud Fam Plann. 2018 Sep;49(3):259-278. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12068. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
4
Measuring the extent of abortion underreporting in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.衡量1995年全国家庭增长调查中堕胎漏报的程度。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 May-Jun;30(3):128-33, 138.
5
Underreporting of induced and spontaneous abortion in the United States: an analysis of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.美国人工流产和自然流产报告不足:2002年全国家庭成长调查分析
Stud Fam Plann. 2007 Sep;38(3):187-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2007.00130.x.
6
Trends in the incidence, rate and treatment of miscarriage-nationwide register-study in Finland, 1998-2016.1998-2016 年芬兰全国范围内流产发生率、发生率和治疗趋势的注册研究。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Nov 1;34(11):2120-2128. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez211.
7
Understanding U.S. fertility: continuity and change in the National Survey of Family Growth, 1988-1995.了解美国的生育情况:1988 - 1995年全国家庭成长调查中的连续性与变化
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Jan-Feb;28(1):4-12.
8
Beyond counting induced abortions, miscarriages and stillbirths to understanding their risk factors: analysis of the 2017 Ghana maternal health survey.除了统计人工流产、流产和死产的数量,还要了解其风险因素:对 2017 年加纳产妇健康调查的分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Feb 16;21(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03633-8.
9
A medical record linkage analysis of abortion underreporting.堕胎漏报情况的病历关联分析。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Sep-Oct;28(5):228-31.
10
Risk factors for spontaneous abortion and its recurrence.自然流产及其复发的危险因素。
Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Aug;128(2):420-30. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114982.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing induced abortion underreporting in restrictive settings using prospective morbidity surveys from Kenya, Liberia, and Sierra Leone.利用来自肯尼亚、利比里亚和塞拉利昂的前瞻性发病率调查评估在限制堕胎环境下的人工流产漏报情况。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 6;15(1):28756. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14096-8.
2
Women's physical health around live births and pregnancy losses: a longitudinal study.围产期及妊娠丢失前后女性的身体健康:一项纵向研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2025 Apr 1;35(2):335-341. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf013.
3
Correction: Detecting underreporters of abortions and miscarriages in the national study of family growth, 2011-2015.更正:在2011 - 2015年全国家庭增长研究中检测人工流产和自然流产的少报情况。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0315112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315112. eCollection 2024.
4
The association between repeated abortions during childbearing age and the psychological well-being of postmenopausal women in Southwest China: an observational study.中国西南地区育龄期反复流产与绝经后妇女心理健康的关系:一项观察性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Nov 30;24(1):805. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07005-w.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Abortion Underreporting on Pregnancy Data and Related Research.流产漏报对妊娠数据及相关研究的影响。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Aug;25(8):1187-1192. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03157-9. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
2
Increasing misreporting levels of induced abortion in Turkey: is this due to social desirability bias?土耳其人工流产报告数量不断增加:这是由于社会期望偏差吗?
J Biosoc Sci. 2020 Mar;52(2):213-229. doi: 10.1017/S0021932019000397. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
3
Effect of ACASI on Reporting of Abortion and Other Pregnancy Outcomes in the US National Survey of Family Growth.ACASI 对美国国家家庭增长调查中堕胎和其他妊娠结局报告的影响。
Stud Fam Plann. 2018 Sep;49(3):259-278. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12068. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
4
Situating stigma in stratified reproduction: Abortion stigma and miscarriage stigma as barriers to reproductive healthcare.将污名置于分层生殖中:堕胎污名和流产污名作为生殖健康护理的障碍。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2016 Dec;10:62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
5
Secrets and Misperceptions: The Creation of Self-Fulfilling Illusions.秘密与误解:自我实现幻觉的形成
Sociol Sci. 2014 Nov;1:466-492. doi: 10.15195/v1.a26.
6
A national survey on public perceptions of miscarriage.一项关于公众对流产看法的全国性调查。
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;125(6):1313-1320. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000859.
7
Latent class analysis of response inconsistencies across modes of data collection.基于数据采集模式的反应不一致性的潜在类别分析。
Soc Sci Res. 2012 Sep;41(5):1017-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 May 11.
8
Recommendations for abortion surveys using the ballot-box technique.关于使用投票箱技术进行堕胎调查的建议。
Cien Saude Colet. 2012 Jul;17(7):1721-4. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232012000700010.
9
Underreporting of induced and spontaneous abortion in the United States: an analysis of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.美国人工流产和自然流产报告不足:2002年全国家庭成长调查分析
Stud Fam Plann. 2007 Sep;38(3):187-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2007.00130.x.
10
Sensitive questions in surveys.调查中的敏感问题。
Psychol Bull. 2007 Sep;133(5):859-83. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859.

检测 2011-2015 年全国家庭增长研究中流产和堕胎漏报情况。

Detecting underreporters of abortions and miscarriages in the national study of family growth, 2011-2015.

机构信息

Westat, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 3;17(8):e0271288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271288. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0271288
PMID:35921280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9348680/
Abstract

This paper draws on individual-level data from the National Study of Family Growth (NSFG) to identify likely underreporters of abortion and miscarriage and examine their characteristics. The NSFG asks about abortion and miscarriage twice, once in the computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) part of the questionnaire and the other in the audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) part. We used two different methods to identify likely underreporters of abortion and miscarriage: direct comparison of answers obtained from CAPI and ACASI and latent class models. The two methods produce very similar results. Although miscarriages are just as prone to underreporting as abortions, characteristics of women underreporting abortion differ somewhat from those misreporting miscarriages. Underreporters of abortions tended to be older, poorer, less likely to be Hispanic or Black, and more likely to have no religion. They also reported more traditional attitudes toward sexual behavior. By contrast, underreporters of miscarriage also tended to be older, poorer, and more likely to be Hispanic or Black, but were also more likely to have children in the household, had fewer pregnancies, and held less traditional attitudes toward marriage.

摘要

本文利用全国家庭增长研究(NSFG)的个人层面数据,确定可能存在堕胎和流产漏报的人群,并对其特征进行了研究。NSFG 对堕胎和流产进行了两次调查,一次是在问卷调查的计算机辅助个人访谈(CAPI)部分,另一次是在音频计算机辅助自我访谈(ACASI)部分。我们使用两种不同的方法来识别可能存在堕胎和流产漏报的人群:CAPI 和 ACASI 两种途径获取答案的直接比较,以及潜在类别模型。这两种方法得出的结果非常相似。虽然流产也同样容易出现漏报,但报告堕胎漏报的女性的特征与报告流产漏报的女性特征有些不同。报告堕胎漏报的女性往往年龄更大、更贫穷、不太可能是西班牙裔或黑人,而且更有可能没有宗教信仰。她们还报告了更传统的性行为态度。相比之下,报告流产漏报的女性也往往年龄更大、更贫穷、更有可能是西班牙裔或黑人,但她们也更有可能家中有孩子,怀孕次数更少,对婚姻的态度也不那么传统。