Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Global Development Program, Integrated Delivery, Seattle, WA, USA, and University of Washington, Department of Global Health, Seattle, WA, USA. Now with Surgo Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA, and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Independent Consultant, London, UK.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015 Jun 17;3(2):209-29. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00020.
By the end of 2014, an estimated 8.5 million men had undergone voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) for HIV prevention in 14 priority countries in eastern and southern Africa, representing more than 40% of the global target. However, demand, especially among men most at risk for HIV infection, remains a barrier to realizing the program's full scale and potential impact. We analyzed current demand generation interventions for VMMC by reviewing the available literature and reporting on field visits to programs in 7 priority countries. We present our findings and recommendations using a framework with 4 components: insight development; intervention design; implementation and coordination to achieve scale; and measurement, learning, and evaluation. Most program strategies lacked comprehensive insight development; formative research usually comprised general acceptability studies. Demand generation interventions varied across the countries, from advocacy with community leaders and community mobilization to use of interpersonal communication, mid- and mass media, and new technologies. Some shortcomings in intervention design included using general instead of tailored messaging, focusing solely on the HIV preventive benefits of VMMC, and rolling out individual interventions to address specific barriers rather than a holistic package. Interventions have often been scaled-up without first being evaluated for effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. We recommend national programs create coordinated demand generation interventions, based on insights from multiple disciplines, tailored to the needs and aspirations of defined subsets of the target population, rather than focused exclusively on HIV prevention goals. Programs should implement a comprehensive intervention package with multiple messages and channels, strengthened through continuous monitoring. These insights may be broadly applicable to other programs where voluntary behavior change is essential to achieving public health benefits.
截至 2014 年底,在东部和南部非洲的 14 个重点国家,已有约 850 万男性接受了自愿男性医学包皮环切术(VMMC)以预防艾滋病毒,占全球目标的 40%以上。然而,需求,特别是在最易感染艾滋病毒的男性中,仍然是实现该计划全面规模和潜在影响的障碍。我们通过审查现有文献并报告 7 个重点国家的项目实地考察,分析了当前针对 VMMC 的需求产生干预措施。我们使用一个包含 4 个部分的框架来呈现我们的发现和建议:洞察发展;干预设计;实施和协调以实现规模;以及衡量、学习和评估。大多数计划策略缺乏全面的洞察力发展;形成性研究通常包括一般可接受性研究。需求产生干预措施因国家而异,从与社区领导的宣传和社区动员到使用人际沟通、中媒体和大众媒体以及新技术。干预设计的一些缺点包括使用一般信息而不是量身定制的信息、仅关注 VMMC 对预防艾滋病毒的好处,以及推出单独的干预措施来解决特定障碍,而不是一整套整体措施。干预措施在没有首先评估其有效性和成本效益的情况下就已经扩大规模。我们建议国家方案根据多学科的见解,为目标人群的特定亚群量身定制协调的需求产生干预措施,而不是仅专注于艾滋病毒预防目标。方案应实施具有多个信息和渠道的综合干预措施包,并通过持续监测加以加强。这些见解可能广泛适用于其他计划,在这些计划中,自愿行为改变对于实现公共卫生效益至关重要。