• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家临床优化研究所:英国国家临床优化研究所卓有成效。

National Institute for Clinical Excellence: NICE works.

作者信息

Rawlins Michael D

机构信息

Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK

出版信息

J R Soc Med. 2015 Jun;108(6):211-9. doi: 10.1177/0141076815587658.

DOI:10.1177/0141076815587658
PMID:26085559
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4480561/
Abstract

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence was established in 1999. Its original remit was to undertake technology appraisals of (mainly) new interventions and to develop clinical guidelines. In providing both forms of guidance, it was required to take into account both clinical and cost effectiveness. After a difficult first few months, it gained the confidence and trust of the professions. It subsequently gained additional responsibilities with a commensurate increase in its staffing and budget. It is, moreover, the only one of the National Health Service organisations established in the late 1990s and early 2000s to have not only survived but grown. This paper describes not only the National Institute for Clinical Excellence's early years but also, in the author's view, the features of its guidance programmes that led to its success and (in retrospect) some things it could have done differently.

摘要

国家临床优化研究所成立于1999年。其最初的职责是对(主要是)新干预措施进行技术评估并制定临床指南。在提供这两种指导形式时,它需要同时考虑临床效果和成本效益。在经历了艰难的最初几个月后,它赢得了专业人士的信心和信任。随后,它承担了更多责任,人员配备和预算也相应增加。此外,它是20世纪90年代末和21世纪初成立的国民保健服务机构中唯一不仅存活下来而且发展壮大的机构。本文不仅描述了国家临床优化研究所的早期岁月,而且在作者看来,还阐述了其指导计划取得成功的特点以及(事后看来)一些它本可以采取不同做法的事情。

相似文献

1
National Institute for Clinical Excellence: NICE works.国家临床优化研究所:英国国家临床优化研究所卓有成效。
J R Soc Med. 2015 Jun;108(6):211-9. doi: 10.1177/0141076815587658.
2
Effects of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence's technology appraisals on prescribing and net ingredient costs of drugs in the National Health Service in England.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所的技术评估对英格兰国民医疗服务体系中药物处方及净成分成本的影响。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25(3):262-71. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309990110.
3
Data briefing. NICE (National Institute for Clinical Excellence).数据简报。英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)。
Health Serv J. 2000 Jun 8;110(5708):32.
4
Quality, innovation, and value for money: NICE and the British National Health Service.质量、创新与性价比:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)与英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)
JAMA. 2005 Nov 23;294(20):2618-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.20.2618.
5
Implications of the appraisal function of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE).英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)评估功能的影响。
Value Health. 2001 May-Jun;4(3):212-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2001.43079.x.
6
Utility values in National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Technology Appraisals.在英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)技术评估中的效用值。
Value Health. 2011 Jan;14(1):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.015.
7
Understanding the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Severity Premium: Exploring Its Implementation and the Implications for Decision Making and Patient Access.理解英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所严重程度附加费:探索其实施及其对决策和患者获得的影响。
Value Health. 2024 Jun;27(6):730-736. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.02.013. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
8
Age-related references in national public health, technology appraisal and clinical guidelines and guidance: documentary analysis.国家公共卫生、技术评估和临床指南及指导中与年龄相关的参考:文献分析。
Age Ageing. 2017 May 1;46(3):500-508. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw235.
9
What Is the Evidence from Past National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Single-Technology Appraisals Regarding Company Submissions with Base-Case Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios of Less Than £10,000/QALY?英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(National Institute of Health and Care Excellence)过去的单一技术评估中,关于公司提交的基础案例增量成本效益比低于10,000英镑/质量调整生命年(QALY)的证据有哪些?
Value Health. 2018 Mar;21(3):341-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
10
DECISION-COMPONENTS OF NICE'S TECHNOLOGY APPRAISALS ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK.NICE 技术评估框架的决策组成部分。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(2):163-171. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000090. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Expanding access to high-cost medicines under the Universal Health Coverage scheme in Thailand: review of current practices and recommendations.泰国全民健康覆盖计划下扩大高成本药品的可及性:当前实践回顾与建议
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Nov 7;16(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00643-z.
2
Infective endocarditis following invasive dental procedures: IDEA case-crossover study.侵袭性牙科操作后的感染性心内膜炎:IDEAS 病例交叉研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 May;26(28):1-86. doi: 10.3310/NEZW6709.
3
Using health economic modelling to inform the design and development of an intervention: estimating the justifiable cost of weight loss maintenance in the UK.利用健康经济建模为干预措施的设计和开发提供信息:估计英国减肥维持的合理成本。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 12;22(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12737-5.
4
Bending Versus Transforming the Drug Cost Curve: A Matter of Political Will.弯曲与改变药品费用曲线:政治意愿的问题。
Cancer J. 2020 Jul/Aug;26(4):304-310. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000458.
5
Rationing decisions and the endowment effect.配给决策与禀赋效应。
J R Soc Med. 2020 Mar;113(3):98-100. doi: 10.1177/0141076819893541.
6
Not so NICE guidelines for patients with aortic aneurysms.针对主动脉瘤患者的指南并非那么“好”。
CVIR Endovasc. 2019 Nov 12;2(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s42155-019-0081-1.
7
How much does it cost?它要多少钱?
J R Soc Med. 2016 Jan;109(1):6. doi: 10.1177/0141076815600961.
8
The importance of being NICE.友善的重要性。
J R Soc Med. 2015 Oct;108(10):385-9. doi: 10.1177/0141076815598877. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
9
How NICE turned into a Teletubby.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)是如何变成天线宝宝的。
J R Soc Med. 2015 Jun;108(6):207. doi: 10.1177/0141076815589451.

本文引用的文献

1
NICE times: a valedictory dispatch.
Lancet. 2013 Jun 29;381(9885):2225-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61250-7.
2
Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study.共病的流行病学及其对医疗保健、研究和医学教育的影响:一项横断面研究。
Lancet. 2012 Jul 7;380(9836):37-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2. Epub 2012 May 10.
3
Impact of the NICE guideline recommending cessation of antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of infective endocarditis: before and after study.NICE 指南建议停止抗生素预防感染性心内膜炎的影响:前后研究。
BMJ. 2011 May 3;342:d2392. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2392.
4
De testimonio: on the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions.《关于治疗干预措施使用决策的证据》
Lancet. 2008 Dec 20;372(9656):2152-61. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61930-3.
5
National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments.国家临床优化研究所及其价值判断。
BMJ. 2004 Jul 24;329(7459):224-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7459.224.
6
How to develop cost-conscious guidelines.如何制定注重成本的指南。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(16):1-69. doi: 10.3310/hta5160.
7
Management of older patients with hypertension in primary care: improvement on the rule of halves.基层医疗中老年高血压患者的管理:对“减半规则”的改进
Age Ageing. 2001 Jan;30(1):73-6. doi: 10.1093/ageing/30.1.73.
8
Postcode prescribing and the Human Rights Act 1998.邮政编码配药与1998年《人权法案》
J R Soc Med. 2001 Apr;94(4):159-60. doi: 10.1177/014107680109400401.
9
[symbol: see text] Zanamivir for influenza.
Drug Ther Bull. 1999 Nov;37(11):81-4.
10
A nasty start for NICE.
Lancet. 1999 Oct 16;354(9187):1313.