• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高血压多学科风险因素评估与管理项目(RAMP-HT)的护理质量评估。

Evaluation of the quality of care of a multi-disciplinary Risk Factor Assessment and Management Programme for Hypertension (RAMP-HT).

作者信息

Yu Esther Yee Tak, Wan Eric Yuk Fai, Chan Karina Hiu Yen, Wong Carlos King Ho, Kwok Ruby Lai Ping, Fong Daniel Yee Tak, Lam Cindy Lo Kuen

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, Ap Lei Chau, Hong Kong.

Primary and Community Services Department, Hospital Authority Head Office, Hong Kong Hospital Authority, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Jun 19;16:71. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0291-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-015-0291-0
PMID:26088560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4471929/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is some evidence to support a risk-stratified, multi-disciplinary approach to manage patients with hypertension in primary care. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of care (QOC) of a multi-disciplinary Risk Assessment and Management Programme for Hypertension (RAMP-HT) for hypertensive patients in busy government-funded primary care clinics in Hong Kong. The objectives are to develop an evidence-based, structured and comprehensive evaluation framework on quality of care, to enhance the QOC of the RAMP-HT through an audit spiral of two evaluation cycles and to determine the effectiveness of the programme in reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.

METHOD/DESIGN: A longitudinal study is conducted using the Action Learning and Audit Spiral methodologies to measure whether pre-set target standards of care intended by the RAMP-HT are achieved. A structured evaluation framework on the quality of structure, process and outcomes of care has been developed based on the programme objectives and literature review in collaboration with the programme workgroup and health service providers. Each participating clinic is invited to complete a structure of care evaluation questionnaire in each evaluation cycle. The data of all patients who have enrolled into the RAMP-HT in the pre-defined evaluation periods are used for the evaluation of the process and outcomes of care in each evaluation cycle. For evaluation of the effectiveness of RAMP-HT, the primary outcomes including blood pressure (both systolic and diastolic), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and estimated 10-year CVD risk of RAMP-HT participants are compared to those of hypertensive patients in usual care without RAMP-HT.

DISCUSSION

The QOC and effectiveness of the RAMP-HT in improving clinical and patient-reported outcomes for patients with hypertension in normal primary care will be determined. Possible areas for quality enhancement and standards of good practice will be established to inform service planning and policy decision making.

摘要

背景

有证据支持在基层医疗中采用风险分层的多学科方法来管理高血压患者。本研究的目的是评估香港繁忙的政府资助基层医疗诊所中针对高血压患者的多学科高血压风险评估与管理计划(RAMP-HT)的护理质量(QOC)。目标是制定一个基于证据、结构化且全面的护理质量评估框架,通过两个评估周期的审核螺旋来提高RAMP-HT的QOC,并确定该计划在降低心血管疾病(CVD)风险方面的有效性。

方法/设计:采用行动学习和审核螺旋方法进行纵向研究,以衡量RAMP-HT设定的预设护理目标标准是否达成。基于计划目标并与计划工作小组及医疗服务提供者合作进行文献综述,制定了一个关于护理结构、过程和结果质量的结构化评估框架。每个参与诊所被邀请在每个评估周期完成一份护理结构评估问卷。在预定义评估期内纳入RAMP-HT的所有患者的数据用于每个评估周期的护理过程和结果评估。为评估RAMP-HT的有效性,将RAMP-HT参与者的主要结局(包括收缩压和舒张压、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇以及估计的10年CVD风险)与未接受RAMP-HT的常规护理高血压患者的结局进行比较。

讨论

将确定RAMP-HT在改善正常基层医疗中高血压患者临床和患者报告结局方面的QOC和有效性。将确定可能的质量提升领域和良好实践标准,为服务规划和政策决策提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf0d/4471929/49ef6ee680cd/12875_2015_291_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf0d/4471929/49ef6ee680cd/12875_2015_291_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf0d/4471929/49ef6ee680cd/12875_2015_291_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the quality of care of a multi-disciplinary Risk Factor Assessment and Management Programme for Hypertension (RAMP-HT).高血压多学科风险因素评估与管理项目(RAMP-HT)的护理质量评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Jun 19;16:71. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0291-0.
2
Evaluation of the quality of care of a multi-disciplinary risk factor assessment and management programme (RAMP) for diabetic patients.多学科危险因素评估和管理计划(RAMP)对糖尿病患者的护理质量评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Dec 5;13:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-116.
3
Effects of risk assessment and management programme for hypertension on clinical outcomes and cardiovascular disease risks after 12 months: a population-based matched cohort study.高血压风险评估与管理项目对12个月后临床结局及心血管疾病风险的影响:一项基于人群的匹配队列研究
J Hypertens. 2017 Mar;35(3):627-636. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001177.
4
Evaluation of the quality of care of a haemodialysis public-private partnership programme for patients with end-stage renal disease.终末期肾病患者血液透析公私合营项目的护理质量评估
BMC Nephrol. 2016 Jul 11;17(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12882-016-0284-9.
5
Assessment of Hypertension Complications and Health Service Use 5 Years After Implementation of a Multicomponent Intervention.评估综合干预实施 5 年后高血压并发症和卫生服务利用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2315064. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.15064.
6
A nurse-based pilot program to reduce cardiovascular risk factors in a primary care setting.一项基于护士的试点项目,旨在降低基层医疗环境中的心血管危险因素。
Am J Manag Care. 2002 Jun;8(6):543-55.
7
Five-Year Cost-effectiveness of the Multidisciplinary Risk Assessment and Management Programme-Diabetes Mellitus (RAMP-DM).多学科风险评估和管理计划-糖尿病(RAMP-DM)的五年成本效益。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Feb;41(2):250-257. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1149. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
8
A comparison of the effectiveness between Western medicine and Chinese medicine outpatient consultations in primary care.中西医学在初级保健中外门诊咨询的效果比较。
Complement Ther Med. 2011 Oct;19(5):264-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
9
A cluster-randomized study on the Risk Assessment and Management Program for home blood pressure monitoring in an older population with inadequate health literacy.一项针对健康素养不足的老年人群家庭血压监测的风险评估和管理方案的整群随机研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020 Sep;22(9):1565-1576. doi: 10.1111/jch.13987. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
10
Effects of 2 educational interventions on the management of hypertensive patients in primary health care.两种教育干预措施对初级卫生保健中高血压患者管理的影响。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2014 Fall;34(4):243-51. doi: 10.1002/chp.21252.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Hypertension Complications and Health Service Use 5 Years After Implementation of a Multicomponent Intervention.评估综合干预实施 5 年后高血压并发症和卫生服务利用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2315064. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.15064.
2
A pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial on combining mind-body physical exercise, cognitive training, and nurse-led risk factor modification to reduce cognitive decline among older adults with mild cognitive impairment in primary care.一项关于结合身心体育锻炼、认知训练和护士主导的风险因素修正以减少初级保健中轻度认知障碍老年人认知衰退的试点可行性随机对照试验。
PeerJ. 2020 Sep 7;8:e9845. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9845. eCollection 2020.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the quality of care of a multi-disciplinary risk factor assessment and management programme (RAMP) for diabetic patients.多学科危险因素评估和管理计划(RAMP)对糖尿病患者的护理质量评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Dec 5;13:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-116.
2
Is the SF-12 version 2 Health Survey a valid and equivalent substitute for the SF-36 version 2 Health Survey for the Chinese?SF-12 版本 2 健康调查是否是 SF-36 版本 2 健康调查的有效且等效替代品?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Feb;19(1):200-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01800.x. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
3
Improving cardiovascular health at population level: 39 community cluster randomised trial of Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP).
A cluster-randomized study on the Risk Assessment and Management Program for home blood pressure monitoring in an older population with inadequate health literacy.
一项针对健康素养不足的老年人群家庭血压监测的风险评估和管理方案的整群随机研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020 Sep;22(9):1565-1576. doi: 10.1111/jch.13987. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
4
2018 Chinese Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension-A report of the Revision Committee of Chinese Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension.《2018中国高血压防治指南——中国高血压防治指南修订委员会报告》
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2019 Mar;16(3):182-241. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.03.014.
5
Effects of risk assessment and management programme for hypertension on clinical outcomes and cardiovascular disease risks after 12 months: a population-based matched cohort study.高血压风险评估与管理项目对12个月后临床结局及心血管疾病风险的影响:一项基于人群的匹配队列研究
J Hypertens. 2017 Mar;35(3):627-636. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001177.
6
Evaluation of the quality of care of a haemodialysis public-private partnership programme for patients with end-stage renal disease.终末期肾病患者血液透析公私合营项目的护理质量评估
BMC Nephrol. 2016 Jul 11;17(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12882-016-0284-9.
提高人群心血管健康水平:心血管健康意识计划(CHAP)的 39 个社区群组随机试验。
BMJ. 2011 Feb 7;342:d442. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d442.
4
Cardiovascular risk management and its impact on hypertension control in primary care in low-resource settings: a cluster-randomized trial.心血管风险管理及其对资源匮乏环境下初级保健中高血压控制的影响:一项集群随机试验。
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Jun;88(6):412-9. doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.062364. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
5
A pilot study on the validity and reliability of the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) in a Chinese population.一项关于患者赋权工具(PEI)在中国人群中有效性和可靠性的初步研究。
Fam Pract. 2010 Aug;27(4):395-403. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmq021. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
6
The 2009 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part 1--blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk.2009年加拿大高血压教育计划高血压管理建议:第1部分——血压测量、诊断与风险评估
Can J Cardiol. 2009 May;25(5):279-86. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(09)70491-x.
7
Antihypertensive medication use and blood pressure control: a community-based cross-sectional survey (ON-BP).抗高血压药物使用与血压控制:一项基于社区的横断面调查(ON-BP)
Am J Hypertens. 2008 Nov;21(11):1210-5. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2008.269. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
8
Characteristics of hypertensive Canadians not receiving drug therapy.未接受药物治疗的加拿大高血压患者的特征。
Can J Cardiol. 2008 Jun;24(6):485-90. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(08)70623-8.
9
General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study.用于初级保健的一般心血管风险概况:弗雷明汉心脏研究
Circulation. 2008 Feb 12;117(6):743-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
10
Missed opportunities for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Canada.加拿大心血管疾病二级预防的错失机遇。
Can J Cardiol. 2007 Dec;23(14):1124-30. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70882-6.