Counterpoint re: "Mammography screening-sticking to the science".
作者信息
Narod S A
机构信息
Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, and Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
出版信息
Curr Oncol. 2015 Jun;22(3):177. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2457.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Counterpoint re: "Mammography screening-sticking to the science".反驳观点：“乳腺钼靶筛查——遵循科学”
Curr Oncol. 2015 Jun;22(3):177. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2457.
2
Response to: "Counterpoint re: 'Mammography screening-sticking to the science'".对《反驳：关于“乳腺钼靶筛查——遵循科学”》的回应。
Curr Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(5):e400. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2612.
3
Point: Mammography screening-sticking to the science.观点：乳腺钼靶筛查——遵循科学
Curr Oncol. 2015 Jun;22(3):174-6. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2371.
4
The 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines are not supported by science: the scientific support for mammography screening.2009年美国预防服务工作组（USPSTF）的指南没有科学依据：乳腺钼靶筛查的科学支持。
Radiol Clin North Am. 2010 Sep;48(5):843-57. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.06.005.
5
Counterpoint: Overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening.反驳观点：乳腺癌筛查中的过度诊断
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Jul;11(7):648-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 May 1.
6
Telephone reminders increase re-screening in a county breast screening program.电话提醒增加了一个县乳腺癌筛查项目中的再次筛查率。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2008 May;19(2):512-21. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0025.
7
United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.美国预防服务工作组的乳房 X 光筛查建议：被忽视的科学。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):W112-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5609.
8
[Mammography screening--ideology contra science].[乳房X线筛查——意识形态与科学相悖]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 Jun 5;168(23):2263; author reply 2263-5.
9
Screening mammography re-evaluated.乳腺钼靶筛查的重新评估
Lancet. 2000 Feb 26;355(9205):747-8; author reply 752. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)72152-8.
10
Controversies in mammography screening: let us not ignore science in this never-ending debate.乳腺钼靶筛查的争议：在这场无休止的辩论中，我们不应忽视科学。
Acta Radiol. 2011 Dec 1;52(10):1061-3. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.11a010.
引用本文的文献
1
Response to: "[Miller's] Response to: 'Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective'".对《[米勒的]对〈超越乳房X光检查之争：一种温和观点〉的回应》的回应
Curr Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(3):e324-6. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3113. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
2
The mammography debate: the senior years.乳腺钼靶检查之争：老年阶段
Curr Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(3):e162-4. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3257. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
3
Response to: "Counterpoint re: 'Mammography screening-sticking to the science'".对《反驳：关于“乳腺钼靶筛查——遵循科学”》的回应。
Curr Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(5):e400. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2612.
4
The mammography debate, round two: science, smoke and mirrors.乳房X光检查之争，第二轮：科学、烟雾与镜像
Curr Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(5):e325-7. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2890.
5
Through a glass darkly: the mammography debate.透过模糊的镜子：乳房X光检查之争
Curr Oncol. 2015 Jun;22(3):171-3. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2584.
Zotero 插件