• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生系统的反应性和报告行为:64 个国家个体因素影响的多层次分析。

Health systems' responsiveness and reporting behaviour: Multilevel analysis of the influence of individual-level factors in 64 countries.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Postbus 2040, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; World Health Organization, Ave. Appia 20, CH1211 Geneva, Switzerland.

World Health Organization, Ave. Appia 20, CH1211 Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2015 Aug;138:152-60. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.022. Epub 2015 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.022
PMID:26093073
Abstract

Health systems' responsiveness encompasses attributes of health system encounters valued by people and measured from the user's perspective in eight domains: dignity, autonomy, confidentiality, communication, prompt attention, social support, quality of basic amenities and choice. The literature advocates for adjusting responsiveness measures for reporting behaviour heterogeneity, which refers to differential use of the response scale by survey respondents. Reporting behaviour heterogeneity between individual respondents compromises comparability between countries and population subgroups. It can be studied through analysing responses to pre-defined vignettes - hypothetical scenarios recounting a third person's experience in a health care setting. This paper describes the first comprehensive approach to studying reporting behaviour heterogeneity using vignettes. Individual-level variables affecting reporting behaviour are grouped into three categories: (1) sociodemographic, (2) health-related and (3) health value system. We use cross-sectional data from 150,000 respondents in 64 countries from the World Health Organization's World Health Survey (2002-03). Our approach classifies effect patterns for the scale as a whole, in terms of strength and in relation to the domains. For the final eight variables selected (sex; age; education; marital status; use of inpatient services; perceived health (own); caring for close family or friends with a chronic illness; the importance of responsiveness), the strongest effects were present for education, health, caring for friends or relatives with chronic health conditions, and the importance of responsiveness. Patterns of scale elongation or contraction were more common than uniform scale shifts and were usually constant for a particular factor across domains. The dependency of individual-level reporting behaviour heterogeneity on country is greatest for prompt attention, quality of basic amenities and confidentiality domains.

摘要

卫生系统的响应能力包括人们所重视的卫生系统接触的属性,并从用户的角度在八个领域进行衡量:尊严、自主性、保密性、沟通、及时关注、社会支持、基本设施的质量和选择。文献提倡调整响应性措施,以报告行为的异质性,这是指调查受访者对响应尺度的不同使用。个别受访者的报告行为异质性会影响国家和人口亚组之间的可比性。它可以通过分析对预定义情景的反应来研究,这些情景描述了医疗保健环境中第三人的经历。本文描述了使用情景研究报告行为异质性的第一种综合方法。影响报告行为的个体水平变量分为三类:(1)社会人口统计学,(2)与健康相关,(3)健康价值体系。我们使用来自世界卫生组织世界卫生调查(2002-2003 年)的 64 个国家的 15 万名受访者的横断面数据。我们的方法根据强度和与各领域的关系,对整个量表的效应模式进行分类。对于最终选择的八个变量(性别、年龄、教育、婚姻状况、住院服务的使用、自身感知健康、照顾患有慢性病的亲密家人或朋友、对响应性的重视),教育、健康、照顾患有慢性病的朋友或亲戚以及对响应性的重视,其效应最强。量表伸长或收缩的模式比均匀的量表变化更为常见,并且在特定因素在各领域通常是恒定的。个人层面报告行为异质性对国家的依赖性在及时性关注、基本设施质量和保密性领域最大。

相似文献

1
Health systems' responsiveness and reporting behaviour: Multilevel analysis of the influence of individual-level factors in 64 countries.卫生系统的反应性和报告行为:64 个国家个体因素影响的多层次分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Aug;138:152-60. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.022. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
2
Which aspects of non-clinical quality of care are most important? Results from WHO's general population surveys of "health systems responsiveness" in 41 countries.非临床医疗质量的哪些方面最为重要?来自世界卫生组织对41个国家“卫生系统反应性”的普通人群调查结果。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 May;66(9):1939-50. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
3
Quality of perinatal care services from the user's perspective: a Dutch study applies the World Health Organization's responsiveness concept.从使用者角度看围产期保健服务质量:荷兰研究应用世界卫生组织的应答性概念。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 29;17(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1464-8.
4
How does mental health care perform in respect to service users' expectations? Evaluating inpatient and outpatient care in Germany with the WHO responsiveness concept.心理健康护理在满足服务使用者期望方面表现如何?运用世界卫生组织的反应性概念对德国的住院和门诊护理进行评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jul 2;7:99. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-99.
5
Measuring health system responsiveness at facility level in Ethiopia: performance, correlates and implications.埃塞俄比亚医疗机构层面卫生系统响应性的测量:绩效、关联因素及影响
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 11;17(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2224-1.
6
Analysis of the validity of the vignette approach to correct for heterogeneity in reporting health system responsiveness.分析病例分析方法对报告卫生系统反应性的异质性进行校正的有效性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Apr;12(2):141-62. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0235-5. Epub 2010 Mar 28.
7
Patient experiences and health system responsiveness among internal migrants: A nationwide study in 13 Indian cities.印度国内移民的就医体验与卫生系统响应能力:一项针对印度13个城市的全国性研究。
J Healthc Qual Res. 2019 Jul-Aug;34(4):167-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
8
Patient experiences and health system responsiveness among older adults in South Africa.南非老年人的患者体验和卫生系统反应性。
Glob Health Action. 2012 Nov 27;5:1-11. doi: 10.3402/gha.v5i0.18545.
9
Assessing responsiveness of health care services within a health insurance scheme in Nigeria: users' perspectives.评估尼日利亚医疗保险计划内医疗服务的反应性:使用者视角。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec 1;13:502. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-502.
10
Responsiveness to the hospital patient needs in Poland.波兰医院对患者需求的响应能力。
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2014;65(2):155-64.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences of women for maternal healthcare services in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.低收入和中等收入国家女性对孕产妇保健服务的偏好:离散选择实验的系统评价
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Aug 7;10(8):e017410. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017410.
2
Assessing Health System Responsiveness in Iraq: A Comprehensive Evaluation through Cross-Sectional Study.评估伊拉克的卫生系统响应性:通过横断面研究进行的综合评估。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2025 May 13;39:67. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.39.67. eCollection 2025.
3
Responsive cancer care in Asia: stigma and pain must be acknowledged and addressed.
亚洲的癌症应对护理:耻辱感和痛苦必须得到承认和解决。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jan 30;33(2):128. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09173-7.
4
Community Health Centers' Responsiveness and Its Associated Factors Among Outpatients in Southeast China: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国东南部门诊患者中社区卫生服务中心的响应性及其相关因素:一项横断面研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Aug 26;17:2023-2034. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S475289. eCollection 2024.
5
Patient satisfaction and value based purchasing in hospitals, Odisha, India.印度奥里萨邦医院的患者满意度和基于价值的采购。
Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Jul 1;102(7):509-520. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.290519. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
6
Healthcare System Responsiveness in Covid-19: An Experience from Capital City of I.R of Iran.新冠疫情期间医疗系统的响应能力:来自伊朗伊斯兰共和国首都的经验
Int J Prev Med. 2023 Mar 21;14:34. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_14_22. eCollection 2023.
7
Inequalities in health system responsiveness among asylum seekers and refugees: A population-based, cross-sectional study in Germany.寻求庇护者和难民在卫生系统响应性方面的不平等:德国一项基于人群的横断面研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Sep 28;2(9):e0000984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000984. eCollection 2022.
8
Patient-Perceived Health System Responsiveness of the Epilepsy Management Project in Rural China during the Period of COVID-19.新冠疫情期间中国农村癫痫管理项目中患者感知的卫生系统响应性
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Apr 25;10(5):799. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050799.
9
The goldmine of patient satisfaction-interaction and communication in the context of infectious diseases.患者满意度的金矿——传染病背景下的医患互动与沟通。
J Med Life. 2021 Jul-Aug;14(4):536-543. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0258.
10
Trust In Governments And Health Workers Low Globally, Influencing Attitudes Toward Health Information, Vaccines.全球范围内,民众对政府和卫生工作者的信任度较低,这影响了他们对健康信息和疫苗的态度。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Aug;40(8):1215-1224. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.02006.