Department of Soil and Water, Estación Experimental de Aula Dei (EEAD-CSIC), Avda. Montañana 1005, Zaragoza, 50059, Spain.
Department of Soil and Water, Estación Experimental de Aula Dei (EEAD-CSIC), Avda. Montañana 1005, Zaragoza, 50059, Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Nov 1;532:456-66. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
Information on sediment sources in river catchments is required for effective sediment control strategies, to understand sediment, nutrient and pollutant transport, and for developing soil erosion management plans. Sediment fingerprinting procedures are employed to quantify sediment source contributions and have become a widely used tool. As fingerprinting procedures are naturally variable and locally dependant, there are different applications of the procedure. Here, the auto-evaluation of different fingerprinting procedures using virtual sample mixtures is proposed to support the selection of the fingerprinting procedure with the best capacity for source discrimination and apportionment. Surface samples from four land uses from a Central Spanish Pyrenean catchment were used i) as sources to generate the virtual sample mixtures and ii) to characterise the sources for the fingerprinting procedures. The auto-evaluation approach involved comparing fingerprinting procedures based on four optimum composite fingerprints selected by three statistical tests, three source characterisations (mean, median and corrected mean) and two types of objective functions for the mixing model. A total of 24 fingerprinting procedures were assessed by this new approach which were solved by Monte Carlo simulations and compared using the root mean squared error (RMSE) between known and assessed source ascriptions for the virtual sample mixtures. It was found that the source ascriptions with the highest accuracy were achieved using the corrected mean source characterisations for the composite fingerprints selected by the Kruskal Wallis H-test and principal components analysis. Based on the RMSE results, high goodness of fit (GOF) values were not always indicative of accurate source apportionment results, and care should be taken when using GOF to assess mixing model performance. The proposed approach to test different fingerprinting procedures using virtual sample mixtures provides an enhanced basis for selecting procedures that can deliver optimum source discrimination and apportionment.
流域泥沙来源信息是制定有效泥沙控制策略、了解泥沙、养分和污染物输移以及制定土壤侵蚀管理计划的基础。泥沙示踪技术被用来量化泥沙源贡献,并已成为一种广泛应用的工具。由于示踪技术具有天然的变异性和局部依赖性,因此有不同的应用程序。在这里,提出了使用虚拟样本混合物自动评估不同示踪技术的方法,以支持选择具有最佳源鉴别和分配能力的示踪技术。从西班牙比利牛斯山脉中部一个集水区的四种土地利用类型的表面样本中:i)作为生成虚拟样本混合物的源,ii)用于特征化示踪技术的源。自动评估方法涉及基于三个统计检验、三个源特征(均值、中位数和校正均值)和两种混合模型目标函数选择的四个最佳综合指纹,比较示踪技术。采用新方法评估了总共 24 种示踪技术,这些技术通过蒙特卡罗模拟进行求解,并使用虚拟样本混合物中已知和评估源归属之间的均方根误差(RMSE)进行比较。结果发现,使用基于 Kruskal Wallis H 检验和主成分分析选择的综合指纹的校正均值源特征对源归属的准确性最高。基于 RMSE 结果,高拟合优度(GOF)值并不总是表明准确的源分配结果,因此在使用 GOF 评估混合模型性能时应谨慎。使用虚拟样本混合物测试不同示踪技术的建议方法为选择能够提供最佳源鉴别和分配的程序提供了更有力的基础。