Suppr超能文献

堕胎服务提供者的类型会影响堕胎后的避孕措施采用情况吗?对加纳64家医疗机构的纵向数据进行的分析。

Does the type of abortion provider influence contraceptive uptake after abortion? An analysis of longitudinal data from 64 health facilities in Ghana.

作者信息

Maxwell Lauren, Voetagbe Gertrude, Paul Mary, Mark Alice

机构信息

Institute for Health and Social Policy, McGill University, 1130 Pine Ave West, Montréal, QC, H3A 1A3, Canada.

Ipas, P.O. Box 9990, Chapel Hill, NC, 27515, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2015 Jun 24;15:586. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1875-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding what factors influence the receipt of postabortion contraception can help improve comprehensive abortion care services. The abortion visit is an ideal time to reach women at the highest risk of unintended pregnancy with the most effective contraceptive methods. The objectives of this study were to estimate the relationship between the type of abortion provider (consultant physician, house officer, or midwife) and two separate outcomes: (1) the likelihood of adopting postabortion contraception; (2) postabortion contraceptors' likelihood of receiving a long-acting and permanent versus a short-acting contraceptive method.

METHODS

We used retrospective cohort data collected from 64 health facilities in three regions of Ghana. The dataset includes information on all abortion procedures conducted between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2010 at each health facility. We used fixed effect Poisson regression to model the associations of interest.

RESULTS

More than half (65 %) of the 29,056 abortion clients received some form of contraception. When midwives performed the abortion, women were more likely to receive postabortion contraception compared to house officers (RR: 1.18; 95 % CI: 1.13, 1.24) or physicians (RR: 1.21; 95 % CI: 1.18, 1.25), after controlling for facility-level variation and client-level factors. Compared to women seen by house officers, abortion clients seen by midwives and physicians were more likely to receive a long-acting and permanent rather than a short-acting contraceptive method (RR: 1.46; 95 % CI: 1.23, 1.73; RR: 1.58; 95 % CI: 1.37, 1.83, respectively). Younger women were less likely to receive contraception than older women irrespective of provider type and indication for the abortion (induced or PAC).

CONCLUSIONS

When comparing consultant physicians, house officers, and midwives, the type of abortion provider is associated with whether women receive postabortion contraception and with whether abortion clients receive a long-acting and permanent or a short-acting method. New strategies are needed to ensure that women seen by physicians and house officers can access postabortion contraception and to ensure that women seen by house officers have access to long-acting and permanent contraceptive methods.

摘要

背景

了解哪些因素会影响流产后避孕措施的采用,有助于改善全面的流产护理服务。流产就诊是向意外怀孕风险最高的女性提供最有效避孕方法的理想时机。本研究的目的是评估流产提供者类型(顾问医师、住院医师或助产士)与两个不同结果之间的关系:(1)采用流产后避孕措施的可能性;(2)流产后采用避孕措施者选择长效和永久性避孕方法而非短效避孕方法的可能性。

方法

我们使用了从加纳三个地区的64个卫生机构收集的回顾性队列数据。该数据集包含了2008年1月1日至2010年12月31日期间每个卫生机构进行的所有流产手术的信息。我们使用固定效应泊松回归模型来分析感兴趣的关联。

结果

在29,056名流产患者中,超过一半(65%)接受了某种形式的避孕措施。在控制了机构层面的差异和患者层面的因素后,与住院医师(相对风险:1.18;95%置信区间:1.13, 1.24)或医师(相对风险:1.21;95%置信区间:1.18, 1.25)相比,当由助产士进行流产手术时,女性更有可能接受流产后避孕措施。与由住院医师诊治的女性相比,由助产士和医师诊治的流产患者更有可能接受长效和永久性避孕方法而非短效避孕方法(相对风险分别为:1.46;95%置信区间:1.23, 1.73;1.58;95%置信区间:1.37, 1.83)。无论提供者类型和流产指征(人工流产或药物流产)如何,年轻女性比年长女性接受避孕措施的可能性更低。

结论

在比较顾问医师、住院医师和助产士时,流产提供者的类型与女性是否接受流产后避孕措施以及流产患者是否接受长效和永久性或短效避孕方法有关。需要新的策略来确保由医师和住院医师诊治的女性能够获得流产后避孕措施,并确保由住院医师诊治的女性能够获得长效和永久性避孕方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9e7/4478624/a4f296170537/12889_2015_1875_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验