Jiang Yuhong V, Sha Li Z, Remington Roger W
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Oct;77(7):2189-206. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0952-z.
This study documented the relative strength of task goals, visual statistical learning, and monetary reward in guiding spatial attention. Using a difficult T-among-L search task, we cued spatial attention to one visual quadrant by (i) instructing people to prioritize it (goal-driven attention), (ii) placing the target frequently there (location probability learning), or (iii) associating that quadrant with greater monetary gain (reward-based attention). Results showed that successful goal-driven attention exerted the strongest influence on search RT. Incidental location probability learning yielded a smaller though still robust effect. Incidental reward learning produced negligible guidance for spatial attention. The 95 % confidence intervals of the three effects were largely nonoverlapping. To understand these results, we simulated the role of location repetition priming in probability cuing and reward learning. Repetition priming underestimated the strength of location probability cuing, suggesting that probability cuing involved long-term statistical learning of how to shift attention. Repetition priming provided a reasonable account for the negligible effect of reward on spatial attention. We propose a multiple-systems view of spatial attention that includes task goals, search habit, and priming as primary drivers of top-down attention.
本研究记录了任务目标、视觉统计学习和金钱奖励在引导空间注意力方面的相对强度。使用一项困难的“L 中找 T”搜索任务,我们通过以下方式将空间注意力引导至一个视觉象限:(i) 指示人们优先关注该象限(目标驱动的注意力);(ii) 频繁地将目标置于该象限(位置概率学习);或 (iii) 将该象限与更高的金钱收益相关联(基于奖励的注意力)。结果表明,成功的目标驱动注意力对搜索反应时间的影响最大。偶然的位置概率学习产生的影响较小,但仍然显著。偶然的奖励学习对空间注意力的引导作用微不足道。这三种效应的 95% 置信区间在很大程度上不重叠。为了理解这些结果,我们模拟了位置重复启动在概率提示和奖励学习中的作用。重复启动低估了位置概率提示的强度,这表明概率提示涉及如何转移注意力的长期统计学习。重复启动合理地解释了奖励对空间注意力的微不足道的影响。我们提出了一种空间注意力的多系统观点,其中包括任务目标、搜索习惯和启动作为自上而下注意力的主要驱动因素。