Reeder Reshanne R, Stein Timo, Peelen Marius V
Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, 38068, Rovereto, Italy.
Institute for Psychology, Otto von Guericke University, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):172-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0872-x.
There is much debate about how detection, categorization, and within-category identification relate to one another during object recognition. Whether these tasks rely on partially shared perceptual mechanisms may be determined by testing whether training on one of these tasks facilitates performance on another. In the present study we asked whether expertise in discriminating objects improves the detection of these objects in naturalistic scenes. Self-proclaimed car experts (N = 34) performed a car discrimination task to establish their level of expertise, followed by a visual search task where they were asked to detect cars and people in hundreds of photographs of natural scenes. Results revealed that expertise in discriminating cars was strongly correlated with car detection accuracy. This effect was specific to objects of expertise, as there was no influence of car expertise on person detection. These results indicate a close link between object discrimination and object detection performance, which we interpret as reflecting partially shared perceptual mechanisms and neural representations underlying these tasks: the increased sensitivity of the visual system for objects of expertise - as a result of extensive discrimination training - may benefit both the discrimination and the detection of these objects. Alternative interpretations are also discussed.
关于在物体识别过程中,检测、分类以及类别内识别之间如何相互关联,存在诸多争论。这些任务是否依赖部分共享的感知机制,或许可通过测试对其中一项任务的训练是否有助于另一项任务的表现来确定。在本研究中,我们探讨了辨别物体的专业技能是否能提高在自然场景中对这些物体的检测能力。自称汽车专家的人(N = 34)执行了一项汽车辨别任务以确定其专业水平,随后进行了一项视觉搜索任务,要求他们在数百张自然场景照片中检测汽车和人物。结果显示,辨别汽车的专业技能与汽车检测准确率密切相关。这种效应特定于专业领域的物体,因为汽车专业技能对人物检测没有影响。这些结果表明物体辨别与物体检测表现之间存在紧密联系,我们将其解释为反映了这些任务背后部分共享的感知机制和神经表征:由于广泛的辨别训练,视觉系统对专业领域物体的敏感度增加,这可能对这些物体的辨别和检测都有益处。我们也讨论了其他解释。