School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor Gwynedd, United Kingdom LL57 1UT.
J Neurosci. 2013 Apr 17;33(16):7003-10. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2853-12.2013.
People are extremely efficient at detecting relevant objects in complex natural scenes. In three experiments, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate the role of the extrastriate body area (EBA) in the detection of people in scenes. In Experiment 1, participants reported, in different blocks, whether people or cars were present in a briefly presented scene. Detection (d-prime) of people, but not of cars, was impaired after TMS over right EBA (rEBA; five pulses at -200, -100, 0, 100, 200 ms) compared with sham stimulation. In Experiment 2, we applied TMS either before (-200, -100 ms) or after (+100, +200) the scene onset. Poststimulus EBA stimulation impaired people detection relative to prestimulus EBA stimulation, while timing had no effect during sham stimulation. In Experiment 3, we examined anatomical specificity by comparing TMS over EBA with TMS over scene-selective transverse occipital sulcus (TOS). Two scenes were presented side by side, and response times to detect which scene contained people (or cars) were measured. For people detection, but not for car detection, response times during EBA stimulation were significantly slower than during TOS stimulation. Furthermore, rEBA stimulation led to an equivalent slowing of response times to left and right lateralized targets. These findings are the first to demonstrate the causal involvement of a category-selective human brain region in detecting its preferred stimulus category in natural scenes. They shed light on the nature of such regions, and help us understand how we efficiently extract socially relevant information from a complex input.
人们在复杂的自然场景中非常有效地检测到相关的物体。在三个实验中,我们使用功能磁共振成像引导的经颅磁刺激(TMS)来研究外纹状体身体区域(EBA)在场景中检测人物的作用。在实验 1 中,参与者在不同的块中报告,在短暂呈现的场景中是否有人或汽车。与假刺激相比,在右 EBA(rEBA;5 个脉冲在-200、-100、0、100、200ms)进行 TMS 后,人们(但不是汽车)的检测(d-prime)受损。在实验 2 中,我们在场景呈现之前(-200、-100ms)或之后(+100、+200ms)施加 TMS。刺激后 EBA 刺激相对于刺激前 EBA 刺激损害了人们的检测,而在假刺激期间,时间没有影响。在实验 3 中,我们通过比较 EBA 上的 TMS 和场景选择性横向枕沟(TOS)上的 TMS 来检查解剖学特异性。并排呈现两个场景,并测量检测哪个场景包含人物(或汽车)的反应时间。对于人物检测,但不是汽车检测,EBA 刺激期间的反应时间明显慢于 TOS 刺激期间。此外,rEBA 刺激导致对左右侧化目标的反应时间等效减慢。这些发现是首次证明类别选择性人脑区域在自然场景中检测其首选刺激类别的因果关系。它们揭示了这些区域的本质,并帮助我们理解我们如何从复杂的输入中有效地提取与社会相关的信息。