Chen Fred K, Agelis Lillian Evangelia, Peh Khaik K, Teong Joanne, Wong Evan Norman Xi Ming
From the *Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Lions Eye Institute), The University of Western Australia, Nedlands; †Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth; and ‡Department of Ophthalmology, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2014 Sep-Oct;3(5):277-85. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000007.
To report factors influencing the relationship between visual acuity (VA) fractions measured on Snellen chart and letter scores on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
This was a retrospective review from a single ophthalmology outpatient clinic.
All patients had routine consecutive VA testing in the right eye using a Snellen chart (1-6 m) and the ETDRS chart (4 m and/or 1 m), by the same optometrist, using a standardized testing protocol for each chart. Both acuity fractions and letter scores were converted to their equivalent logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for comparison. Multiple regression analysis was performed.
A total of 237 patients with a wide range of ocular disease and VAs were enrolled. Mean age was 63 years (range, 18-95 years). Recorded VA (logMAR) was better on Snellen chart by a mean (95% limits of agreement) of -0.07 (-0.33 to +0.18, P < 0.001). There was a trend for subjects with VA worse than 6/36 to read 3 to 6 letters more and those better than 6/36 to read 4 to 5 letters less on the ETDRS chart. Visual acuity level and amblyopia contributed to a small portion (17%-26%) of the total variance in the difference between logMAR equivalents derived from the 2 charts.
The discrepancy in VA derived from Snellen and ETDRS charts was nonuniform across VA range. This has implications on interpretation of published studies converting Snellen fractions to logMAR for analysis and reporting of VA outcomes.
报告影响在斯内伦视力表上测得的视力(VA)分数与早期糖尿病视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)视力表上字母得分之间关系的因素。
这是一项来自单一眼科门诊的回顾性研究。
所有患者均由同一名验光师使用标准化测试方案,在右眼进行常规连续视力测试,分别使用斯内伦视力表(1 - 6米)和ETDRS视力表(4米和/或1米)。视力分数和字母得分均转换为等效的最小分辨角对数(logMAR)进行比较。进行了多元回归分析。
共纳入237例患有各种眼部疾病和不同视力的患者。平均年龄为63岁(范围18 - 95岁)。在斯内伦视力表上记录的视力(logMAR)平均(95%一致性界限)比ETDRS视力表好 -0.07(-0.33至+0.18,P < 0.001)。在ETDRS视力表上,视力低于6/36的受试者有多读3至6个字母的趋势,而视力高于6/36的受试者则少读4至5个字母。视力水平和弱视在两张视力表得出的logMAR等效值差异的总方差中占一小部分(17% - 26%)。
从斯内伦视力表和ETDRS视力表得出的视力差异在不同视力范围内并不均匀。这对已发表研究中将斯内伦分数转换为logMAR以分析和报告视力结果的解释有影响。