Falkenstein Iryna A, Cochran Denine E, Azen Stanley P, Dustin Laurie, Tammewar Ajay M, Kozak Igor, Freeman William R
Joan and Irwin Jacobs Retina Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Center, University of California, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Ophthalmology. 2008 Feb;115(2):319-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.05.028. Epub 2007 Aug 13.
To compare the measurements of visual acuity (VA) results measured with Snellen and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts in eyes with and without age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
Cross-sectional study.
One hundred four participants (190 eyes) selected from a university retina practice; 80 participants (142 eyes) had some degree of AMD.
Visual acuity was measured in each patient using standard procedure with both Snellen and ETDRS charts in random order. Statistical analysis of the results was performed.
Difference in VA measured by both charts in logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) notations.
Overall, the mean Snellen VA was 0.78 logMAR (= 20/120), and the mean ETDRS VA in the same eye was 0.54 logMAR (= 20/70; P<0.001). In the low vision group (<20/200), represented by patients with AMD, the average difference in number of lines was considerably larger than in the good vision range (>20/30). On average, 20/200 on Snellen was 20/95 on ETDRS (>3 lines difference), and 20/30 on Snellen was 20/25 on ETDRS (<1 line difference).
Our results show poor agreement between the Snellen and ETDRS charts, and it was more pronounced in the group with poor vision. The ETDRS measurements yielded better VA, particularly in participants with vision <20/200 (representing more advanced AMD patients). We suggest taking these findings into consideration when comparing outcomes in clinical practices (which typically measure VA using standard Snellen charts) with outcomes from clinical trials (which typically measure VA using ETDRS charts).
比较使用斯内伦视力表和糖尿病视网膜病变早期治疗研究(ETDRS)视力表测量有或无年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)眼睛的视力(VA)结果。
横断面研究。
从一所大学视网膜诊所选取104名参与者(190只眼睛);80名参与者(142只眼睛)有一定程度的AMD。
对每位患者使用标准程序,随机顺序用斯内伦视力表和ETDRS视力表测量视力。对结果进行统计分析。
用两种视力表测量的视力在最小分辨角对数(logMAR)表示法上的差异。
总体而言,平均斯内伦视力为0.78 logMAR(=20/120),同一只眼睛的平均ETDRS视力为0.54 logMAR(=20/70;P<0.001)。在以AMD患者为代表的低视力组(<20/200)中,行数的平均差异比在良好视力范围(>20/30)中要大得多。平均而言,斯内伦视力表上的20/200相当于ETDRS视力表上的20/95(相差超过3行),斯内伦视力表上的20/30相当于ETDRS视力表上的20/25(相差不到1行)。
我们的结果显示斯内伦视力表和ETDRS视力表之间一致性较差,在视力差的组中更为明显。ETDRS测量得出的视力更好,尤其是在视力<20/200的参与者中(代表更晚期的AMD患者)。我们建议在比较临床实践(通常使用标准斯内伦视力表测量视力)的结果与临床试验(通常使用ETDRS视力表测量视力)的结果时考虑这些发现。