• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短疗程复方新诺明、诺氟沙星和左氧氟沙星在门诊单纯性尿路感染细菌学治愈中的有效性和耐受性。一项开放标签、平行组、随机对照试验。

Effectiveness and tolerability of short course co-trimoxazole, norfloxacin and levofloxacin in bacteriological cure of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in outpatient setting. An open label, parallel group, randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Vachhani Arpit Vallabhbhai, Barvaliya Manish, Naik Viren, Jha Pramod, Tripathi Chandrabhanu

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology; Department of Medicine, Government Medical College, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

Infez Med. 2015 Jun;23(2):155-60.

PMID:26110296
Abstract

To compare the bacteriological cure rate of short-course (3-day) treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) using co-trimoxazole, norfloxacin and levofloxacin, patients with uncomplicated UTI were randomized to receive either co-trimoxazole (960 mg) twice a day or norfloxacin (400 mg) twice a day or levofloxacin (250 mg) once a day for three days. Urine culture was done at the end of treatment and evaluated for bacteriological cure rate in each group. Among a total of 175 patients, Escherichia coli (74.29%) was the most common organism isolated followed by Klebsiella (11.43%), Streptococcus (6.29%), Staphylococcus saphrophyticus (5.14%), and Pseudomonas (2.86%). At the end of three days' treatment, bacteriological cure rates were 86.2%, 87.7% and 83.3% for co-trimoxazole, norfloxacin and levofloxacin, respectively (p>0.05). Therefore short-course treatment with co-trimoxazole 960 mg twice a day, norfloxacin 400 mg twice a day and levofloxacin 250 mg once a day are almost equally effective for treatment of uncomplicated UTI.

摘要

为比较使用复方新诺明、诺氟沙星和左氧氟沙星短程(3天)治疗单纯性尿路感染(UTI)的细菌学治愈率,将单纯性UTI患者随机分组,分别接受复方新诺明(960毫克)每日2次、诺氟沙星(400毫克)每日2次或左氧氟沙星(250毫克)每日1次,疗程均为3天。治疗结束时进行尿培养,并评估每组的细菌学治愈率。在总共175例患者中,分离出的最常见病原体为大肠杆菌(74.29%),其次为克雷伯菌(11.43%)、链球菌(6.29%)、腐生葡萄球菌(5.14%)和假单胞菌(2.86%)。治疗3天后,复方新诺明、诺氟沙星和左氧氟沙星的细菌学治愈率分别为86.2%、87.7%和83.3%(p>0.05)。因此,每日2次服用960毫克复方新诺明、每日2次服用400毫克诺氟沙星以及每日1次服用250毫克左氧氟沙星的短程治疗对单纯性UTI的治疗效果几乎相同。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and tolerability of short course co-trimoxazole, norfloxacin and levofloxacin in bacteriological cure of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in outpatient setting. An open label, parallel group, randomized controlled trial.短疗程复方新诺明、诺氟沙星和左氧氟沙星在门诊单纯性尿路感染细菌学治愈中的有效性和耐受性。一项开放标签、平行组、随机对照试验。
Infez Med. 2015 Jun;23(2):155-60.
2
Norfloxacin versus co-trimoxazole for the treatment of upper urinary tract infections: a double blind trial.诺氟沙星与复方新诺明治疗上尿路感染的双盲试验
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1988;56:28-34.
3
Treatment of urinary tract infections in Hong Kong: a comparative study of norfloxacin and co-trimoxazole.香港地区尿路感染的治疗:诺氟沙星与复方新诺明的对比研究
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1988;56:22-7.
4
Efficacy and safety of norfloxacin 800 mg once-daily versus norfloxacin 400 mg twice-daily in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.每日一次服用800毫克诺氟沙星与每日两次服用400毫克诺氟沙星治疗女性单纯性尿路感染的疗效和安全性:一项双盲随机临床试验。
J Chemother. 1998 Apr;10(2):122-7. doi: 10.1179/joc.1998.10.2.122.
5
A trial comparing low-dose, short-course ciprofloxacin and standard 7 day therapy with co-trimoxazole or nitrofurantoin in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection.一项比较低剂量、短疗程环丙沙星与标准7天复方新诺明或呋喃妥因疗法治疗单纯性尿路感染的试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Mar;43 Suppl A:67-75.
6
Comparison of short-term treatment regimen of ciprofloxacin versus long-term treatment regimens of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or norfloxacin for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections: a randomized, multicentre, open-label, prospective study.环丙沙星短期治疗方案与甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑或诺氟沙星长期治疗方案用于单纯性下尿路感染的比较:一项随机、多中心、开放标签的前瞻性研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Oct;54(4):840-3. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh414. Epub 2004 Sep 3.
7
Treatment of recurrent urinary tract infection with norfloxacin versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.诺氟沙星与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗复发性尿路感染的对比
Urology. 1990 Feb;35(2):187-93. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(90)80074-w.
8
Norfloxacin versus co-trimoxazole in the treatment of recurring urinary tract infections in men.诺氟沙星与复方新诺明治疗男性复发性尿路感染的对比研究
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1986;48:48-53.
9
Comparison of cefixime and co-trimoxazole in acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection. A double-blind general practice study.头孢克肟与复方新诺明治疗急性单纯性尿路感染的比较。一项双盲全科医学研究。
S Afr Med J. 1986 Oct 11;70(8):455-60.
10
Norfloxacin versus co-trimoxazole for treatment of urinary tract infections in adults: microbiological results of a coordinated multicentre study.诺氟沙星与复方新诺明治疗成人尿路感染的比较:一项多中心协作研究的微生物学结果
Scand J Infect Dis. 1987;19(5):551-7. doi: 10.3109/00365548709032422.

引用本文的文献

1
Intestinal Microbiota Correction in the Treatment and Prevention of Urinary Tract Infection.肠道微生物群调节在尿路感染治疗与预防中的作用
Turk J Urol. 2022 Nov;48(6):406-414. doi: 10.5152/tud.2022.22119.
2
A systematic review of the outcomes reported in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection clinical trials.对单纯性尿路感染临床试验中所报告结果的系统评价。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Mar 22;4(2):dlac025. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac025. eCollection 2022 Apr.