Houston Samuel K, Rayess Nadim, Cohen Michael N, Ho Allen C, Regillo Carl D
Mid Atlantic Retina and Wills Eye Hospital Retina Service, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Retina. 2015 Sep;35(9):1757-64. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000663.
To determine the influence of vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) on treatment outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who were treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents using a treat and extend treatment regimen.
A retrospective consecutive case series of 204 eyes from 181 patients with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up at Wills Eye Hospital Retina Service. Vitreomacular interface characteristics were determined by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. One hundred and fifty-three eyes (75%) had no signs of VMA (non-VMA), and 51 (25%) had VMA.
Baseline mean visual acuity was 20/133 with a mean central retinal thickness of 350.5 μm in the non-VMA group and was 20/145 with 371.8 μm in the VMA group. Mean visual acuity in the non-VMA group was 20/83 and 20/64 at Years 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.01 to baseline). Mean visual acuity in the VMA group was 20/81 and 20/85 at Years 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.01 to baseline). The central retinal thickness was 289.71 μm and 267 μm at Years 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.01 to baseline) in the non-VMA group and was 305.3 μm and 289.24 μm (P < 0.01 to baseline) in the VMA group. The mean total number of injections at Year 1 for non-VMA was 7.4 compared with 8.4 in VMA (P = 0.001) and 5.5 versus 6.7 for the 2 groups in Year 2 (P = 0.027). The mean longest extension at Year 1 was 11.8 weeks compared with 10.1 week (P = 0.005) and for Year 2 was 14.1 weeks compared with 12 weeks (P = 0.041).
The vitreomacular interface seems to have a significant influence on anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment intervals but not visual acuity or exudative control outcomes. Eyes with VMA on spectral domain optical coherence tomography at baseline may require more intensive treatment with decreased ability to extend treatment intervals.
确定玻璃体黄斑粘连(VMA)对采用按需治疗并延长治疗方案接受抗血管内皮生长因子药物治疗的新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者治疗效果的影响。
对威尔斯眼科医院视网膜科181例患者的204只眼进行回顾性连续病例系列研究,随访时间至少1年。通过频域光学相干断层扫描确定玻璃体黄斑界面特征。153只眼(75%)无VMA体征(非VMA组),51只眼(25%)有VMA。
非VMA组基线平均视力为20/133,平均中心视网膜厚度为350.5μm;VMA组基线平均视力为20/145,平均中心视网膜厚度为371.8μm。非VMA组第1年和第2年的平均视力分别为20/83和20/64(与基线相比,P<0.01)。VMA组第1年和第2年的平均视力分别为20/81和20/85(与基线相比,P<0.01)。非VMA组第1年和第2年的中心视网膜厚度分别为289.71μm和267μm(与基线相比,P<0.01),VMA组分别为305.3μm和289.24μm(与基线相比,P<0.01)。非VMA组第1年的平均注射总次数为7.4次,VMA组为8.4次(P=0.001);两组在第2年分别为5.5次和6.7次(P=0.027)。第1年非VMA组的平均最长延长时间为11.8周,VMA组为10.1周(P=0.005);第2年分别为14.1周和12周(P=0.041)。
玻璃体黄斑界面似乎对抗血管内皮生长因子的治疗间隔有显著影响,但对视力或渗出控制效果无影响。基线时频域光学相干断层扫描显示有VMA的眼可能需要更强化的治疗,且延长治疗间隔的能力降低。