McCormick Matthews L H, Noble F, Tod J, Jaynes E, Harris S, Primrose J N, Ottensmeier C, Thomas G J, Underwood T J
Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Somers Cancer Research Building, MP824, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
1] Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Somers Cancer Research Building, MP824, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK [2] Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Br J Cancer. 2015 Jun 30;113(1):107-18. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.179. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
Oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) is one of the fastest rising malignancies with continued poor prognosis. Many studies have proposed novel biomarkers but, to date, no immunohistochemical markers of survival after oesophageal resection have entered clinical practice. Here, we systematically review and meta-analyse the published literature, to identify potential biomarkers.
Relevant articles were identified via Ovid medline 1946-2013. For inclusion, studies had to conform to REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer (REMARK) prognostic study criteria. The primary end-point was a pooled hazard ratio (HR) and variance, summarising the effect of marker expression on prognosis.
A total of 3059 articles were identified. After exclusion of irrelevant titles and abstracts, 214 articles were reviewed in full. Nine molecules had been examined in more than one study (CD3, CD8, COX-2, EGFR, HER2, Ki67, LgR5, p53 and VEGF) and were meta-analysed. Markers with largest survival effects were COX-2 (HR=2.47, confidence interval (CI)=1.15-3.79), CD3 (HR=0.51, 95% CI=0.32-0.70), CD8 (HR=0.55, CI=0.31-0.80) and EGFR (HR=1.65, 95% CI=1.14-2.16).
Current methods have not delivered clinically useful molecular prognostic biomarkers in OAC. We have highlighted the paucity of good-quality robust studies in this field. A genome-to-protein approach would be better suited for the development and subsequent validation of biomarkers. Large collaborative projects with standardised methodology will be required to generate clinically useful biomarkers.
食管腺癌(OAC)是发病率上升最快的恶性肿瘤之一,预后一直很差。许多研究提出了新的生物标志物,但迄今为止,尚无用于食管切除术后生存情况的免疫组化标志物进入临床应用。在此,我们系统回顾并荟萃分析已发表的文献,以确定潜在的生物标志物。
通过Ovid医学数据库检索1946年至2013年的相关文章。纳入的研究必须符合肿瘤标志物报告(REMARK)预后研究标准。主要终点是汇总风险比(HR)和方差,以总结标志物表达对预后的影响。
共识别出3059篇文章。排除无关标题和摘要后,对214篇文章进行了全文审查。有9种分子在不止一项研究中被检测(CD3、CD8、COX-2、表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)、Ki67、LgR5、p53和血管内皮生长因子(VEGF))并进行了荟萃分析。对生存影响最大的标志物是COX-2(HR = 2.47,置信区间(CI)= 1.15 - 3.79)、CD3(HR = 0.51,95%CI = 0.32 - 0.70)、CD8(HR = 0.55,CI = 0.31 - 0.80)和EGFR(HR = 1.65,95%CI = 1.14 - 2.16)。
目前的方法尚未在OAC中产生临床上有用的分子预后生物标志物。我们强调了该领域高质量可靠研究的匮乏。从基因组到蛋白质的方法将更适合生物标志物的开发及后续验证。需要开展采用标准化方法的大型合作项目,以生成临床上有用的生物标志物。