Department of Internal Medicine, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway Department of Cardiology, Trondheim University Hospital, 7006 Trondheim, Norway
Department of Internal Medicine, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Dec;16(12):1323-30. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev158. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
Our aim was to determine the feasibility and accuracy of diagnosing significant coronary artery stenoses using peak stenotic to prestenotic velocity ratio (pSPVR) measurements when compared with results from quantitative coronary angiography and coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).
One hundred and eight patients scheduled for coronary angiography were studied using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Stenoses were identified by local colour aliasing by colour flow Doppler, and further evaluated by pSPVR, using a pSPVR of ≥2.0 as a cut-off for significant stenosis. When pSPVR could not be measured, local mosaic coronary flow pattern at Nyquist limit ≥0.48 m/s was used. Sixty-five lesions suggestive of stenosis were found by TTE. Combining findings of pSPVR ≥2.0 and local mosaic flow at Nyquist limit ≥0.48 m/s, the sensitivity and specificity of demonstrating significant stenoses (diameter stenosis, 50-99%) in the left main coronary artery (LM), left anterior descending coronary (LAD), left circumflex coronary (Cx), and right coronary artery (RCA) were 75 and 98%, 74 and 95%, 40 and 87%, and 34 and 98%, respectively. The pSPVR did not differ significantly between arteries with reduced and normal CFVR, with a cut-off of CFVR <2.0.
Findings of pSPVR ≥2.0 or localized colour flow aliasing are useful in the non-invasive diagnosis of significant coronary disease in the three main coronary arteries, with high specificity for detecting significant stenoses. These findings showed high sensitivity for identifying significant stenoses in the LM and LAD, but showed lower ability to detect those lesions in the Cx and RCA.
本研究旨在通过经胸超声心动图(TTE)测量峰值狭窄前速度比(pSPVR),与定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)和冠状动脉血流储备(CFVR)结果进行比较,确定其在诊断主要冠状动脉狭窄中的可行性和准确性。
本研究纳入 108 例行冠状动脉造影术的患者,使用经胸多普勒超声心动图进行研究。通过彩色血流多普勒的局部彩色混叠来识别狭窄,并通过 pSPVR 进一步评估,以 pSPVR≥2.0 作为狭窄的截断值。当无法测量 pSPVR 时,使用奈奎斯特限制处≥0.48m/s 的局部马赛克状冠状动脉血流模式。TTE 发现 65 处疑似狭窄病变。当 pSPVR≥2.0 和奈奎斯特限制处≥0.48m/s 的局部马赛克状血流相结合时,左主干(LM)、左前降支(LAD)、左回旋支(Cx)和右冠状动脉(RCA)狭窄程度为 50%-99%的显著狭窄的敏感性和特异性分别为 75%和 98%、74%和 95%、40%和 87%、34%和 98%。在 CFVR<2.0 时,pSPVR 在具有降低和正常 CFVR 的动脉之间没有显著差异。
pSPVR≥2.0 或局部彩色血流混叠的发现可用于诊断三支主要冠状动脉的显著冠状动脉疾病,具有很高的特异性,可用于检测显著狭窄。这些发现对 LM 和 LAD 中显著狭窄的检出具有较高的敏感性,但对 Cx 和 RCA 中病变的检出能力较低。