Gehrke Sergio Alexandre
Biotecnos Research Center, Department of Research, Santa Maria, Brazil; and the Catholic University of Uruguay, Professor of the Post-Graduate Program in Dental Implants, Montevideo, Uruguay.
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jul;26(5):1482-6. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001788.
This study was designed to compare the cortical bone reaction following traditional osteotomy or the use of a single-use final drill in the osseointegration of implants in the tibia of rabbits.
For this study, 48 conical implants, of standard surface type and design and manufactured by the same company, were inserted into the tibiae of 12 rabbits and removed after 30 or 60 days for histologic analysis. Two test groups were prepared according to the drill sequence used for the osteotomy at the preparation sites: in the control group was used a conventional drill sequence with several uses, whereas the test group (tesG) used a single-use final drill. The bone-to-implant contact and qualitative factors of the resulting cortical bone were assessed.
Both techniques produced good implant integration. Differences in the linear bone-to-implant contact were observed between the drilling procedures as time elapsed in vivo, with the tesG appearing to have clinical advantages. Both groups exhibited new bone in quantity and in quality; however, the tesG exhibited a higher level of new bone deposition than the control group.
Within the limitations of this study, the findings suggest that the use of a single-use final drill leads to better and faster organization of the cortical bone area during the evaluated period and may avoid the possible problems that can be caused by worn drills.
本研究旨在比较传统截骨术或使用一次性终末钻在兔胫骨种植体骨整合过程中皮质骨的反应。
在本研究中,将48枚由同一公司生产的标准表面类型和设计的锥形种植体植入12只兔的胫骨中,并在30天或60天后取出进行组织学分析。根据种植体植入部位截骨时使用的钻孔顺序准备两个试验组:对照组使用多次使用的传统钻孔顺序,而试验组(tesG)使用一次性终末钻。评估骨与种植体的接触情况以及由此产生的皮质骨的定性因素。
两种技术均产生了良好的种植体整合。随着体内时间的推移,在钻孔程序之间观察到线性骨与种植体接触的差异,试验组似乎具有临床优势。两组在新骨的数量和质量方面均表现良好;然而,试验组的新骨沉积水平高于对照组。
在本研究的局限性内,研究结果表明,在评估期间,使用一次性终末钻可使皮质骨区域组织化更好、更快,并可避免磨损钻头可能引起的问题。